EU urges Pakistan to push for repeal of blasphemy laws

The Parliament expressed particular concern about the case of Aasia Bibi

Afp November 27, 2014

STRASBOURG, FRANCE: The European Parliament called Thursday on Pakistan to overhaul its blasphemy laws with a view to repealing them, saying they were "increasingly used to target" Christians and other minorities.

The Parliament expressed particular concern about the case of Aasia Bibi, a Christian woman sentenced to death four years ago for insulting the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) during an argument with a Muslim woman over a bowl of water.

Her sentence was upheld last month by the Lahore High Court, dashing hopes the conviction might be overturned or commuted to a jail term.

In a non-binding resolution, members of the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France expressed their concern that blasphemy laws "are increasingly used to target vulnerable minority groups, including Ahmedis and Christians, in Pakistan."

The resolution "calls on the government of Pakistan to carry out a thorough review of the blasphemy laws and their current application ... with a review to repealing the laws."

It also "calls on the government of Pakistan to abolish the death penalty, including for blasphemy or apostasy."

Around 50 MEP's meanwhile wrote to EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini urging her to ask Pakistan to show clemency toward Aasia Bibi.

In a final recourse in her case, Bibi filed an appeal in the Supreme Court on Monday.

Blasphemy is a hugely sensitive issue in Pakistan, with even unproven allegations often prompting mob violence.


Dr.A.K.Tewari | 6 years ago | Reply

There is two visible impacts of Islamic holy book on the Ummat . One is visible in Turkish muslims and other is visible in Pak society . Blashphemy law is the product of them .

vaqas | 6 years ago | Reply

No review needed, it is quite plain that blasphemy laws need to be abolished with immediate effect.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ