PM's press secretary denies media reports of premier's address today
The PM's press secretary denied the reports without divulging any further details.
Private media channels reported that PM Nawaz was to address Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf chairman Imran Khan's rigging allegations ahead of his 'decisive rally' scheduled for November 30 in the federal capital. Further, it was claimed that he would discuss the prevailing security situation of the country and the energy crisis.
State-run Radio Pakistan also momentarily reported that the PM would address the nation today. However, the link to the story is no longer visible. The last time PM Nawaz addressed the nation was on August 12, before PTI and Pakistan Awami Tehreek marched to the federal capital to stage a sit-in to overthrow the Nawaz-led government.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1732356840-0/Copy-of-Untitled-(1)1732356840-0-270x192.webp "pti islamabad protest mohsin naqvi contacts barrister gohar denies permission for rally or sit in")
1732355030-0/BeFunk_§_]__-(41)1732355030-0.jpg "pti arming youth force activists and afghan nationals punjab information minister alleges")
@pakistani: @Sheikh: @Ch. Allah Daad: the supermarket ran out of tomatoes and eggs and also the PM IS DOING EVERY THING BY himself, ,so something will need to give especially when Minister of Information crash landed with an aeroplane
@Sheikh: how childish. is KPK been made heaven by PTI led regime? Peshwar has become the world 7th most dangerous place. For god sake, ask your leader to go fix KPK first. Its burning.
Come on Mian Sahib, attack like a lion and teach these street kids, anarchists and fake revolutionary thugs a lesson. They have already done a great damage to economy and reputation of the country.
Hahahahah Ironic! This shows the mindset of the PML-N Rigged Government. They cant even make this decision how on earth are they running the country?
oops because of his picture I didn't read "not". I take my comment back.