Also, there are fears that given the enormity of the size and cost of the projects and knowing our system, we may not be able to avert situations of ‘force majeure’ or inevitable delays, with hidden cost-escalation as experienced in some earlier projects, notably the controversial Nandipur plant. Whatever the reality, the government owes it to the people to bring transparency into all aspects of the Chinese ‘investment’ package. Our relationship with China is too important to be dragged into domestic controversies.
The Chinese, on their part, were indeed quick to dispel any speculations. In a media briefing in Islamabad, a senior Chinese official confirmed the signing of 19 agreements during the prime minister’s visit to Beijing earlier this month. Though he did not give the exact value of the agreed projects, he made it clear that China wants to ensure their early and transparent completion. “For us, their execution is a challenge as we have signed these documents with firm commitment,” he said. According to him, out of the 19 projects, 13 were energy related, which will be functional by 2018.
China’s projects, he said, were all for the people of Pakistan. Specifically citing the Pakistan-China Economic Corridor, the Gwadar Port and the newly launched Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank as the major “engagements” between the two neighbours, the Chinese official made it clear that Pakistan-China economic cooperation was without any political preconditions. Reiterating China’s known position, he said: “We will not let our friends suffer in testing times. We are strong friends — ‘The Iron Brothers’ — and we will continue to discuss issues of mutual benefit and cooperation.”
This indeed is a factual reflection of the China-Pakistan friendship, which is not based on transient interests or expediencies and is above such events like change of governments or personalities in both countries. The unmatched special feature of this relationship is the mutual trust and confidence based on convergence of strategic interests that the two countries have built over the decades as an asset of their friendship. Both countries have been supporting each other in their just causes, which for Pakistan include a peaceful settlement of the Kashmir issue and preservation of its independence and territorial integrity, and for China, the issues of Taiwan, human rights in Tibet and Xinjiang.
There is a strong strategic mutuality in this approach, making economic and security cooperation the bedrock of this multi-dimensional relationship as a factor of peace and stability in this region. From the Karakoram Highway to the newly completed Gwadar Port, a string of industrial plants, factories, electrical and mechanical complexes, power-producing units, including hydro and nuclear power plants, stand testimony to China’s vital contribution to our country’s economic development. Their new plans encompass a whole range of connectivity, construction, and economic and technical cooperation, including the Pakistan-China Economic Corridor linking Pakistan’s coastal areas with northwest China.
This indeed is a huge agenda with mutual interests rooted in their common vision for a better future for their own peoples and for peace and prosperity of the region itself. For China, it is the ‘national rejuvenation’ through accelerated development of its backward western regions, whereas for Pakistan, it is the imperative of converting its geopolitical location into an asset rather than a liability. The real challenge for both now remains how vigorously and faithfully they can translate this common vision into reality.
On their part, the Chinese have always delivered on their commitment. Their help has always been selflessly unconditioned involving even sacrifices in terms of many Chinese lives. Even today, thousands of Chinese engineers and workers are engaged under most difficult conditions in building roads, bridges, tunnels, dams, schools and hospitals for the people of Pakistan. The problem is on our side. Economic activity’s basic ingredients comprise consistent policies, a stable law and order situation and supporting infrastructure, including requisite energy. These are missing in our country.
The history of two vital aspects of our cooperation with China — trade potential and the Gwadar Port — totally neglected by us for almost a decade, should be an eye-opener as far as our capacity or ability to ensure time-barred and cost-effective completion of new projects is concerned. The problem is that we do not even have a policy or priority framework nor an integrated approach in handling development projects and funds, which often lapse due to non-utilisation. A number of projects are lost or abandoned only because there is no coordination among the relevant agencies of our government.
The perilous security situation, the continuing energy crisis and our corrupt politico-bureaucratic machinery are the biggest bottlenecks and warrant immediate attention if we are serious about honouring our own commitment to realise the common goals envisioned as part of the new China-Pakistan plans. Our industrial wheel is mostly non-operational constricting our export productivity. No wonder, our trade with China remains one-sided. It’s also a pity that a country of 200 million people and tremendous engineering skills and a talent reservoir today can’t even run its own ports, railways or airlines.
We are still waiting for the Chinese to come and start operating the Gwadar Port. A nation that leaves itself completely at the mercy of others and continues to look for disinterested favours from them is not worthy of independence. We must not embarrass our Chinese friends by overstretching our demands that might one day amount to ransoming the country. The situation needs a change in our mindset and a paradigm shift in our governance patterns, which require hard decisions.
Also, the two countries need to rise above meaningless cliches that they often use in describing their friendship such as ‘higher than the mountains and deeper than the oceans’. Lately, for whatever reason, the Chinese are using a new title for this relationship — ‘The Iron Brothers’. Perhaps, they don’t understand its connotation in the Pakistani context.
The two countries will be better off without all these titles, remaining good friends, sincere to each other and steadfast in their common interests guided by mutuality — neither too high nor too deep — but strong enough to face the fast-changing regional and global ground realities and common challenges of peace, cooperation and prosperity.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 22nd, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (23)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@bahadur khan: Well said. Education is the only remedy for the countries problems. The author has simply expressed his opinion which may or may not provide aggregate benefits. The Chinese are investing in African countries as well to capitalise on the low cost labour in foreign lands.
Rex Minor
1-First of all, these r not MoUs anymore, 19 binding projects have actually been "SIGNED" under the 'Early Harvest Program' (means they r binding now). 2-Chinese companies are supposed to provide electricity at decided upon rates (7.5-8.5c/Unit).So if they delay or plants breakdown, it will be the company's loss, not Pakistan's.When agreements r of such nature, Companies have to ensure quality for their own sake. 3-If projects r delayed beyond stipulated time, the investing company does not get it's IRR for delayed time (unless delay is caused by Govt of Pakistan's fault). So once again, the risk is on investors' shoulders.
Now the real thing we need to do is provide some degree of stability to the investor and make sure we meet our own part of the commitment (provision of land, coal transport infrastructure, transmission lines, etc). If we can do that, it's a win-win for all, Pakistan needs investments, and Chinese need good rate of return, which they r getting here.
R@Ravi: shamshad Ahmed has enjoyed fruits of power, foreign postings, Seville row suits, property in diplomatic enclaves. Like many theorists is out of touch with common man, and problems. There are many in sub continent. Among them bilawal Bhutto, Rahul Gandhi, pervez elahi family. They may be at best, heard, read, and copy kept in library. Fortunately he looks at least serious, we have one diplomat Sashi tharoor, who is national disgrace. Tweets, five marriages, SMS to pakistani journalists etc.
Dear Author, Please just google to get info about nature of investment by China. It will be fund by Chinese bank to Chinese company only purely base upon commercial funding. No direct loan to Pakistan or Pakistani company. Chinese company will recover their investment in three short year from Pakistani people. Now you do the math & understand where Pakistani will stand after that. Feel sorry for failed leadership of Pakistan who born with tunnel vision since its creation.
We must not embarrass our Chinese friends by overstretching our demands that might one day amount to ransoming the country.
Nothing could be better for Pakistan than becoming a province of the Godless Republic of China.
The Chinese do not seem to be too keen to have another Xinjiang on their hands.
@Fazal Dad: " Pakistan has way more potential than an average Indian can think. " All I can say is that Pakistanis have kept this potential well hidden for he last 67 years except for matters such as the more efficient suicide vests, water cars and energy from djinns.
Iron Brothers...Ironic Brothers....Irony Brothers....
please refer this authors article PRIMACY OF DEMOCRACY -DAWN AUGUST 2006. the thought appears to be same - country is not ready to work on constitution and self reliant. May i ask for 37 years when you were in close connection to military rulers did you suggest or enforce any change. or you were armchair socrates, may i say kahlil gibran
Throughout this process, Machiavelli’s political philosophy based on his infamous “doctrine of necessity” became an integral part of our body politic. In fact, we allowed this doctrine to circumscribe the supremacy of our Constitution, and opted for systemic aberrations with no parallel in political philosophy or contemporary history. The sole beneficiary of this system in our country has been the “wilful ruler” who was either “the child of fortune” or was “born into power” or who “acquired power through deceit and force.”
Another lesson of history that we have not yet learnt is that the basic nature of man requires peace, not war, and a state, in order to survive and prosper, must be organised for peace. In our case, throughout our independent existence, we have been living under a perennial state of “military primacy” in our national priorities and policies. This has been one of the alibis for the frequent and protracted spells of military rule in the country. The Quaid had the ability to see far ahead of his times. Addressing the officers of the Army Staff College, Quetta on June, 14, 1948, he reminded the armed forces of their constitutional responsibilities, urging them “to understand the true constitutional and legal implications of their oath of allegiance” to the country’s Constitution. Indeed, he had foreseen the ominous writing on the wall. The tale of our country’s subsequent political history is a sad reflection on our successive failures to uphold and preserve the sanctity of our Constitution.
Mr. Shamshad Ahmad is making immense sense. Regrettably, only few understand the depth of his frustration and helplessness. Wake up Pakistan, Chinese are unforgiving.
@American: Get over Pakistan phobia my dear Indian--------American. Pakistan has way more potential than an average Indian can think. Having said this, the right title for this article was "Quest for Regional Hegemony." Also please keep in mind that Pakistani are not pseudo-nationalist, we love our country when we have to and criticise when necessary.
Iron Brothers is very appropriate. That is even better than the "higher than mountains", "sweeter than honey". This means that China is now blood brother of Pak, both irons are welded into one. Soon it will be " Golden Brothers", each raking in gold from the other! This seems the only "Platonic" relationship in the world history, between completely different races!
Looking at the caption I thought the blog was about the "Iron Brothers" from Koth Lakhpat". Was it a Freudian slip by the writer?
@bahadur khan Few Bangladeshi Entrepreneur ordered whole Solvent Extraction Plants & Refineries from Chinese companies, After that Indian Turnkey Plant supplier(An Indian MNC from which i belongs) suddenly got many enquiries & 5 Huge orders from Bangladesh, after Commissioning of 2 plants & 1 refinery i curiously asked my Process Engineer why we are getting such massive orders from Bangladesh, He simply answered Chinese failed to deliver what they have committed, They were unable to meet Production, Quality of Final product was far beyond acceptable norms(FFA was to High) & Their plants definitely looks beautiful but after a little bit time it is just Junk. yesterday i paid almost twice of the price for my Car headlight(Indian make) & refused the Chinese one.
@Rahul: When PM of India signs MoUs with Chinese or Japanese you expect those MoUs to be fructified 100% ? Track record of Gujarat which was ruled by modi for more than 10 years has been dismal . The performance of conversion of MoUs into reality is far from satisfactory for state of Gujarat. Gujarat stands among lowest among Indian states with respect to hit rate for MoU into actual operations. BJP supporters ( NRI mostly) will do yeoman service to India if they keep their preaching and loud high morale grounds to their homes. India will prosper and progress not by Photo Ops or loud Marketing , but by actually working hard on making changes on ground in terms of Law, security, investment climate, maze of rules, transparency , fighting corruption etc.
It may be a good experience/exposure for Pakistanis to visit power plant sites of chinese built in india.project is costing Rs 3.4 crore per megawatt (india). The project is some what built. Then the chinese will put delay on bad coal, bad water, bad water infrastructure, improper colony for staff. These problems are there in every project in sub continent. Then when the 1000MW project is built there is no escape. We cannnot do anything except get it repaired through extra work. thus costing same as highest bidder, I think the motive is to capture Tharparkar coal than develop power in Pakistan.
Its not Iron brothers, its an iron grip .... there is no free lunch in this world. We need to transparently see the details of the deal, and what new items did our leaders sell out to china in backdoor deals? Slowly but surely, chinese are putting a hard grip around us, controlling every sector of the economy, closing local factories and turning us into willing subjects.. i am surprised no one here talks about it..
The article makes it clear that the realization has finally dawned on the Pakistani leadership that there is not enough substance in Pakistan China relationship except some lofty titles ... the anti-India plank that binds the two countries together is being diluted too fast for Pakistan's comfort ... !!
Not bad at all. Now the former Foreign Secretary is talking sense.
The ONLY common interest between Pakistan and China is a desire to keep India down, a goal that has largely failed. That is not a foundation strong enough to build anything worthwhile. That is why there is nothing to show but broken Locomotives and shoddy consumer products and un-proven Nuclean Technologies. Soon Pakistan will become another North Korea.
Dear Author what you have failed to mention is that the reason things dont get completed on time is due to the corrupt and inefficient bureaucracy which is the biggest impediment to anything and everything in the land of the pure. Therefor it would be wise if in your next article you could actually concentrate on the hindrance that is your former brethren. Regards,
Good luck to Pakistan with the projects. It should help improve the economy
None of these MOUs are going to materialize. When the going gets tough, Pakistan always makes a dash for dictatorships like China, UAE or Saudi Arabia. Being dictatorships, they can make any kind of wild promises, sign any MOU's because they are not answerable to the people and don't have a press that can question them. That does not mean they are actually going to invest their hard earned money. China will invest to the extent they can sell more stuff to you. Saudi will invest to indocrinate you, think more madrassas. 2 years down the road all these MOU's will be forgotten. If you want real investment, take a mirror and look at yourself first.