Comment: India’s punitive policy

Pakistan's India policy suffers from incoherence and a failure to recognize the new dynamics of this relationship


Dr Hasan Askari Rizvi October 09, 2014



The troubled India-Pakistan relations have now drifted to a crisis situation. The cancellation of the foreign secretary level talks scheduled for August 25 coincided with escalated tension on the Line of Control (LoC) in Kashmir and the Working Boundary that separates Indian administered Kashmir from Pakistani territory.  The clashes of troops in the latter location became intense in the first week of October.  


The bilateral relations deteriorated to such an extent despite Pakistan’s best efforts to salvage the bilateral dialogue process stalled since the end of 2012.  Pakistan’s Adviser on National Security and Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz’s statement in an interview with an Indian newspaper, reported in Pakistani press on September 29, aimed at reducing India’s irritation on the meeting of Pakistan’s High Commissioner in New Delhi with Kashmiri leaders on August 18-19.  He described this meeting as somewhat ill-timed.

The proposed Foreign Secretary level talks were cancelled by India shortly after Pakistan’s High Commissioner in New Delhi met with a Kashmiri leader, Syed Shabbir Shah on August 18. This meeting was described by India’s Ministry of External Affairs as an effort “to interfere in India’s internal affairs.” On August 19, Pakistan’s High Commissioner met three Kashmiri leaders. India’s reaction to the first meeting was uncalled for because Pakistan’s High Commissioner used to meet the Kashmiri leaders from time to time in the past. Many a time, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister on visit to New Delhi met the Kashmiri leaders. Therefore, the meeting in August was not a new development.

The effort by Sartaj Aziz to dilute the negative diplomatic impact of the meeting was also surprising. Why should he complain about its timings? After all, Pakistan’s High Commissioner in New Delhi must be acting on the direction of the Foreign Office. If this was not the case, who directed him to engage the Kashmiri leaders? If the High Commissioner acted on his own, he should be reprimanded especially because the Secretary-level talks were not focused on Kashmir.

There is nothing wrong in Pakistan’s desire to improve and expand relations with India, including trade and economic ties. However, its India policy suffers from incoherence and a failure to recognize the new dynamics of this relationship.

Since the Mumbai terrorist attack (November 2008) India has reduced the India-Pakistan relations to a single-issue relationship. That is, Pakistan must satisfy India on the terrorism issue before taking up the resolution of other issues.  Whereas India, supported by the United States, blamed Pakistan based militant groups for the Mumbai incident and violence in Kashmir, Pakistan shied away from addressing this question.

India’s notion of “limited war” and “punitive action” short of triggering a full-war is now manifesting itself in the shape of repeated violence on the LoC. The previous and the present Indian army chiefs have talked of adopting a tough line towards Pakistan, reflecting the growing role of the Indian army in shaping India’s Pakistan policy.

Pakistan needs to evolve a definite diplomatic response to India’s punitive strikes against the backdrop of the sharing of ideas between India and the US for coping with the Punjab-based militant groups focusing on Kashmir, the US designation of some Pakistan militant groups as terrorists and the growing confluence of interest between the hardliners inside the ruling BJP and the Indian army.

How can Pakistan convince the international community that its fight against terrorism is inclusive of all militant groups and the Modi government is engaged in violence against Pakistan for domestic reasons in view of India’s state elections, including the forthcoming Kashmir elections?

Published in The Express Tribune, October 10th, 2014.

COMMENTS (14)

Last Word | 9 years ago | Reply

First principle which India and rest of the world had learnt so far is that no one can reason with Pakistan of its using terror as the state policy. India, US and other Western countries have repeatedly asked Pakistan to shun this ill-conceived policy and even warned it of grave consequences but failed to convince the latter. India and Pakistan came very close to fighting a war in 2001 on the same issue which forced Musharraf to stop cross-border terrorism for at least two years but the same has since continued with impunity. After Mumbai attack the relations worsened when Pakistan's complicity came to light and its failing to take any action against the accused and allowing them to openly threaten India publicly, hardened latter's stance towards Pakistan. The new Indian govt led by Modi made it explicitly clear that he would show zero tolerance to any border violation but Pakistan failed to pay heed and continued its business as usual even with more ferocity. This punitive action and massive response against border violations and incursions which Modi promised to the people of India before elections has been implemented to perfection and much to satisfaction of the armed forces who wanted a free hand to deal with Pak forces effectively and decisively. The ball now lies in the Pakistan's court to either stop border violations or face more consequences even graver than the one it faced during the present case. .

harkol | 9 years ago | Reply

India would uses punitive action on border because it doesn't want full scale war with Pakistan, and it can't just keep on tolerating repeated violations of its border by a rogue army that isn't under the control of its own elected executive.

It is entirely up to Pakistani Generals to convert it into a full war by escalating it even further. It has done so 4 times before, so one more won't be a surprise. If Pakistanis believe an army that has undermined democracy in Pakistan, then they only have themselves to blame.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ