Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Nasirul Mulk has clarified his position regarding PTI president Javed Hashmi’s claim on Monday that the incumbent CJP had an ‘understanding’ with Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan to topple the PML-N government.
The CJP rejected Hashmi’s claim, adding that he had no direct or indirect understanding with PTI chief Imran Khan in this regard. He gave the clarification while hearing a petition filed by Lahore High Court Rawalpindi bench President Shafqat Bhatti on the prevailing political turmoil.
Justice Mulk said he had met Imran Khan only once regarding the introduction of biometric polling systems for the local government elections in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) and petitions pending in election tribunals when he was the acting chief election commissioner, adding that the Election Commission secretary and three other PTI members were part of the meeting.
Justice Jawwad S Khawaja added that individuals do not matter as the whole bench decides the case in the apex court. “It has become a feature of our society to level baseless allegations against institutions to malign them without any concern for consequences,” commented Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali. Justice Jamali also expressed concern over the attack on the PTV headquarters and other state buildings. “We have shown restraint in this matter,” he said.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 3rd, 2014.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Please initiate a defamation suite against the him!
If the judges are sincere then they should make an unequivocal statement that they would protect the parliament and constitution. The history of our SC has been that it always endorsed the overthrow of elected govt and all acts of high treason. There has not been a single military takeover that the SC did not like and did not endorse. With this 100% black history it is natural to get suspicious.