Misplaced priorities: $23 million Kerry-Lugar funds going to waste

Differences over resource allocation likely to deny Pakistan long-term benefits


Shahbaz Rana August 16, 2014

ISLAMABAD:


Alleged misplaced priorities of Pakistani policymakers are leading to the wastage of $23 million in funds provided by the US under the Kerry-Lugar-Berman Act. Differences over the allocation of resources for research to promote pro-poor economic growth are likely to deny the country any long-term sustainable benefits.


An audit report of the four-year Pakistan Strategy Support Programme, carried out by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the US, and background discussions with policymakers involved in designing the programme revealed how the foreign funds are being wasted.

The audit findings, in this case at least, contradict the belief that the US was forcing its will on Pakistan when it comes to using resources allocated under the five-year $7.5 billion Kerry-Lugar-Berman civilian assistance package.

In 2011, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) awarded a $22.7 million contract to the US-based International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). USAID has already committed $16.2 million and disbursed $12.4 million till the end of April.

The programme was aimed at improving agriculture production, water management and irrigation, macroeconomics, markets, trade and poverty reduction with the core goal of contributing to pro-poor economic growth and enhanced food security in the country.  The project was initiated at request of the then Planning Commission (PC) deputy chairman, Dr Nadeemul Haque, the OIG report said.



However, Dr Haque, who is currently in Abuja, Nigeria, says that he never sought funds for the agriculture sector.

“I had requested funds for supporting the Framework of Economic Growth (FEG),” Dr Haque said, adding that while IFPRI and USAID had asked him to sign the agreement for agriculture purposes, the funds were supposed to be given to support the FEG.”

“IFPRI and USAID deceived me as they did not provide funds to support the FEG,” he told The Express Tribune. Dr Haque said he had no role in this and the money was used according to the wish of the Americans. He added that he was against any further research in the agriculture sector.

What Dr Haque said is not supported by the project agreement, however. The former PC deputy chairman, as head of the project’s National Advisory Committee (NAC), did not approve the formulation of provincial subcommittees in the panel, the OIG report said.

Due to differences over the use of resources, funds were provided for agriculture without the involvement of the provinces, which had the ownership of the sector under the 18th constitutional amendment.

The OIG audit did find that the programme was making progress. Through two competitive rounds of applications, USAID awarded 37 research grants to Pakistani researchers – amounting to $808,091 – which helped improve their skills. The programme also financed 33 studies with $3.3 million, which will help formulate educated policies in the agriculture sector, according to the OIG report. As many as 32 workshops, conferences and seminars were held for discussions on policy research.

But insiders say the original idea was to set up a state of the art agriculture research institute. The idea was overturned by former NAC deputy chairman Haque, who supported giving grants to the youth for research.

The programme is still suffering, this time in the hands of Dr Haque’s successor, PC Deputy Chairman and Federal Minister for Planning, Development and Reforms Ahsan Iqbal.

Auditors found out that Iqbal was not giving due time to the NAC meetings. He was not providing the programme the required time as well. As of April 2014, he has not approved the NAC’s work plan. According to the OIG report, although the programme was making progress, implementation weaknesses may threaten its sustainability.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 16th, 2014.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (3)

win | 6 years ago | Reply

@Saleem: Did you even read the article? The donors sent the money right back home to a US org.

AAfromUSA | 6 years ago | Reply

"The audit findings, in this case at least, contradict the belief that the US was forcing its will on Pakistan when it comes to using resources allocated under the five-year $7.5 billion Kerry-Lugar-Berman civilian assistance package."

" “IFPRI and USAID deceived me as they did not provide funds to support the FEG,” he told The Express Tribune. Dr Haque said he had no role in this and the money was used according to the wish of the Americans."

Seems like the Audit finds what they wanted, just like for the money, they do not want to listen to the recipient.

If a donor gives what recipient does not want, they better take it back. The problem with all the aid is, it is often delusional. Most of the money comes is taken back by the donor through most expensive technical assistance and capital purchases required to be made through their approved suppliers. Most often less than 15 percent is spent locally.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ