Our people saw in it the promise of long-cherished freedom, democracy and prosperity. What an irony that a country, which on its birth was considered a ‘20th-century miracle’, and which was created entirely through a democratic and constitutional struggle, should still be struggling for genuine democracy, social justice and equal rights for all. We are seeing things repeatedly being done in the name of democracy that are no more than a mockery of the very ideals that inspired the vision of the Quaid’s Pakistan. Alas! The Quaid did not live long to personally steer Pakistan to be what he thought would be “one of the greatest nations of the world”.
Less than a month before his death, the Quaid addressed his last message to the nation on August 14, 1948, in which he reminded his people: “The foundations of your state have been laid and it is now for you to build, and build as quickly and as well as you can.” On his own part, to quote Richard Symons, “in accomplishing the task he had taken upon on the morrow of Pakistan’s birth, Jinnah had worked himself to death, but had contributed more than any other man to Pakistan’s survival.” His successors neither had the will nor capacity to build the state of Pakistan. The real Pakistan disappeared within less than a quarter of a century. Within the first year of our independence, the Quaid had presciently foreseen the coming events. Political ineptitude was writ large on the country’s horizon. He was disillusioned with the scarcity of calibre and character in the country’s political hierarchy. His worries were not unwarranted. After his early demise, we have had had a long miscellany of opportunistic and corrupt rulers, who never inspired hope for a democratic state that could guarantee socio-economic justice and fair administration to all Pakistani citizens. They just could not cope with the challenges of freedom inherent in our geopolitical and structural fault lines.
During the last year of his life, the Quaid addressed almost every segment of society, including legislators, the armed forces, civil servants, educationists, students, the business community, workers, lawyers and the public, providing guidelines on every aspect of national life for “building up Pakistan into a modern and democratic state based on the Islamic concept of equality, fraternity and social justice”. Had the Quaid lived longer, he would have only been embarrassed to see how miserably we, as a nation, have failed to live up to his vision of Pakistan. On our part, we are not even ashamed of what we have done to his Pakistan.
On this independence anniversary, instead of fighting among ourselves, we should have been doing some soul-searching, howsoever agonising it may have been. We have a full generation’s lifetime behind us to look upon ourselves and see what we have done to our country. It is a hazy and tainted picture. We see a mutilated and disjointed nation. We see a mastless country, looted and plundered by its own people, debilitated spiritually and left with no dignity and national pride. Its rulers have kept the people hostage to their personal whims while exploiting them through deceitful promises.
Our problem is that the overbearing feudal, tribal and elitist power structure in Pakistan has been too deeply entrenched to let any systemic change take place as this doesn’t suit the elite. They make amendments to the Constitution for self-serving reasons only. The country is still without a political system that responds to the needs of an ethnically and linguistically diverse population. Instead of removing our systemic weaknesses and reinforcing the unifying elements of our nationhood, they have always succumbed to narrowly-based, self-serving temptations.
The elite rejected the popular will freely expressed in the December 1970 elections, and instead of exploring political remedies to the resultant crisis, went along with a military solution. We are currently going through another self-made crisis. In every respect, it is a deja vu scenario. Our independent statehood is a woeful tale of traumatic experiences that perhaps, no other country in the world has experienced. Frequent political breakdowns, followed by long spells of military rule disabled our institutional framework unleashing a culture of political instability, societal chaos and disintegration, violence and extremism, endemic corruption, and general aversion to the rule of law.
No doubt, we have survived these crises but at what cost? We learnt no lessons from our history and are repeating the same mistakes. It is time, we as a nation, realised that our survival as an independent state is predicated on our ability, not only to preserve and safeguard the country’s independence and territorial integrity, but also to get rid of the present anachronistic system based on power and privilege, outmoded social and political structures and an elitist-led status quo. This change is long overdue.
To avert the vicious cycle of known tragedies, we need a serious and purposeful national effort, involving a holistic review of our governmental system and a parallel discourse among major political stakeholders and key civil society segments, including the media and lawyer community to explore and evolve a national remedial and recovery plan before it is too late.
As a country and as a nation, at this critical phase in our history, we cannot just leave ourselves to the vagaries of time or at the mercy of a few elitist privileged families that keep themselves in power through deceit, money and force. We can’t even innocently continue to believe that everything will be all right, magically or providentially. With our dismal record in democratic tradition, we are now on a crucial trial of our history to determine how we restore the Quaid’s legacy in Pakistan. Not by force or violence, and certainly not by usurping fundamental freedoms that our Quaid always fought for.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 16th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (36)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Tariq:
"Had Maulana Azad lived, he would have seen how India’s secularism has died and today majority has elected a Fundamentalist Hindu party, whose MP forced Muslim Indian national to break his fast."
If if is so bad, why aren't any Indian Muslims, especially guy who was "forced to break his fast" not gate-crashing to migrate to Pakistan that was created to be the heaven for Muslims of India? Why is it that the asylum migration is happening in the opposite direction, namely, from Pakistan to India and other countries?
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad knew. He forecast what would happen to Pakistan and every word has come out true so far. I fear the worst is yet to come for Pakistan and it worries me to have such a neighbour.
@Tariq: Which planet do you live on. You need to seriously get your head out of the sand. Modi is more secular than any leader that has ever led Pakistan (including Jinnah). How many muslims and hindus died because of Jinnah? (Hint: Hundreds of thousands). However hes still treated like some so called Messiah in Pakistan. Pakistanis can keep living in denial and making themselves feel better by believing that Modi is a muslim hater and BJP is a fundamentalist hindu party and India is a right wing hindu county. India has its share of problems but India didnt vote for Modi cause he is Hindu or cause he is percieved to be right wing but because he has delivered on development. If he becomes autocratic or doesnt deliver the growth that india deserves then Modi is going to be thrown into the dustbin of history like many sub-continental leaders of the past like Jinnah, Ayub Khan, Zia, Indira Gandhi, Man Mohan Singh etc. The average Indian has a far more mature understanding of what democracy and secularism is than the average Pakistani. Pakistanis expect instantaneous change and thats why the army is hailed as the saviour everytime it takes power but its made Pakistans institutions more week/unstable in the long run. India is going to leave Pakistan far far behind under Modi even if he is a failure.
@AVMPolpot: What about Ministry of Murdering and Raping Indian minorities, where the sole occupied Muslim majority state has been under brutal military occupation for past 60 years, it's men women and children killed because they are Muslims.
@Mukund:
Had Maulana Azad lived, he would have seen how India's secularism has died and today majority has elected a Fundamentalist Hindu party, whose MP forced Muslim Indian national to break his fast. India'seculaism died with Gandhi Jee and Nehru.
Hey there was no 'legacy' at all. and the chaos is a natural result of the historical and monumental mishap. please read. http://rationalinferences.wordpress.com/2013/08/15/independenceofpk/
@AVMPolpot: " Wow now doesnt that apply equally to Pakistan and Bangladesh?" ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ To apply the logic of the author,' The country came into being as a result of a long and relentless struggle of the Muslims of the subcontinent '...in first case against Hindus and in the second case ........marvel against the Muslims!.
" the Quaid had presciently foreseen the coming events." ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Including Pakistan slide into Terror/Militancy, Load shedding , Polio and hosting OBL for a decade.
I think the author has completely missed the truth ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Pakistans raison d'etre is Kashmir and all the negatives listed in this article are what Pakistan has chosen as sacrifices to attain that goal. OK I tried!
After reading this article the Paki PM Contacted Allah for an audience +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The PM was allowed 2 qns: 1. PM asked when will Pakistan be a prosperous country? Allah replied it will be but not in your lifetime. 2. PM asked when will Pakistan become a true democracy? Allah replied: it will but not in my lifetime.
" On our part, we are not even ashamed of what we have done to his Pakistan." +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I knew something was missing in Pakistan's governance...a Ministry of Ashamedness.
I am very confident that Ultimate Direct Democracy is the answer. I realize how difficult it is to accept that a Pakistani has come up with a new democratic governance system that he claims will make the planet prosperous and peaceful. Elected Representative Democracy, the present system is now extinct, like the dinosaurs. ET it seems fair to ask your investigative team to hear me out in detail, and if they can, expose the faults in my system. If they can do this, I too will be helped in getting rid of a delusion. If this is not a challenge, I don't know what is. Please publish.
" The country came into being as a result of a long and relentless struggle of the Muslims of the subcontinent for a separate homeland." ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Wow now doesnt that apply equally to Pakistan and Bangladesh?
@JohnUK: I think India is doing just fine. May be Pakistanis would prefer to go back under Britishers. But wait, most of their politicians are already British citizens. Nope sorry, no one wants Britishers back.
@clap clap: So many contradictions, so much intellectual blindness and dishonesty by the author.his assertions have no real value till all the Muslims residing in India earn their reward of struggle and settle down in Pakistan. Both India & Pakistan have duty to see this is accomplished on priority basis so both states can go on building their economic and social future. This will usher in permanent peace era in South Asia. Pakistani Muslims should not anymore deny the right of rest of South Asian Muslims to enjoy and cherish the fruits of Muslim struggle under the able leadership of Pakistan 's founding father.
And how many Prime Ministers the author reckons Pakistan should sacrifise to keep the country as Pakistan. Does Pakistan need the large army and the little boys and the fat men to protect the current boundries from its next door neighbour, while providing zero security for its citizens.
Rex Minor
@JohnUK: Indians certainly do not believe that we would benetter under British colonialism. When British came to India they had 1% of India's GDP and India had 17%. When they left, the numbers were reversed. Indians have no desire to be be enslaved once more. We march confidently forward towards a future that seems better than the recent past (as in past 300 years).
An honest,very patriotic article. It is always a pleasure to read an article, which focuses on Muhammad Ali Jinnah'role and vision for Pakistan. The maverick leader,whose personality has been molded in all sorts of casts, had pressurized the Hindu chauvinists and white masters( at an urgency to exit India), was able to wriggle out an independent state inspired by religious reservations of Muslims. That was his remarkable contribution. Former secretary has effectively dealt with the mishandling of the infant state at the hands of subsequent inept power players.He has denounced the use of force during 1970 election,he has condemned feudal, elite and tribal structure of Pakistani polity, and has stood by the freedom of expression. That means he proposes a need to modernize Pakistan. Indeed, if all his recommendations become a reality, one would cease to be cynical about existence in Pakistan. All expatriates will return to the land of pure to live a life of dignity, will celebrate the independence day with full scale patriotism.
Has this ever occured to you that if Quaid-e-Azam had lived longer it would have been a nightmare and a tragedy for him to see the direction in which the religious bigots were driving Pakistan? All these nostalgic lamentations are but a myth.It is no time to come back all the time on 'what would have happened to Pakistan if jinnah had lived longer'. Looking at how we behave today and how quickly things started getting worse already in 1950's one can reasonably assume that Jinnah would have been humiliated very quickly by the religious bigots who today hold Pakistan as hostage.
@JohnUK: In my opinion, both India and Pakistan would have been better off under British colonialism.
Those were terrible times for India. No Indian ever wants the British to return.
The country came into being as a result of a long and relentless struggle of the Muslims of the subcontinent for a separate homeland.
With the above statement, the author does great disservice to millions of Muslims in India who neither voted for the Muslim League nor sought partition nor moved to Pakistan after partition. These include Muslims in the kingdoms of Travancore, Mysore, etc. who never took part in the Indian provincial elections of 1946.
No political,social and cultural rights given,communitys deliberately deprived from above and languages they spoke.Baloch and Sindhies turned into minority,30 years uninterrupted,unending war in pushtoone areas,all the ways holy wars,beside this what happened with majority "Bangalies",very sad story.All in the name of Islam.
Pakistan was created at the cost of hundreds of millions of Muslims who remained in India It was created where Pakistan already existed that is majority Muslim areas So what was the achievement ? Permanant slavery and deprevassion for Muslim of India and continuation of rule of nawabs waderas and fudeals chaudhries and thugs in Pakistan
You have been a part of the ruling Establishment that has made policies, lied and misled people on the direction in which the country is progressing. Now it is time to place the burden of ones failures somewhere else. Is it not time to shoulder the responsibilities for ones past actions or do you believe the citizens are so dumb they can be fooled for another 67 years ?
Noe brace yourself from the hate filled comments from trolls across the border.
Since the author is an ex-Foreign Secretary, Jinnah's views on foreign policy need to be recalled. Speaking to Richard Hare of the US State Department, Jinnah said the establishment of Pakistan was " essential to prevent 'Hindu imperialism' spreading" to the Middle East! Speaking to the legendary Margaret Bourke-White of Life, Jinnah told her that "America needs Pakistan more than Pakistan needs America.......Pakistan is the pivot of the world, as we are placed....the frontier on which the future position of the world revolves". I could give more examples. Both of these factors - the hatred of India, and Pakistan's delusions about itself - continue to inform Pakistan's foreign policy. The Qaid's legacy has hardly been betrayed, on the contrary, it is alive and well in Pakistan!
"The country came into being as a result of a long and relentless struggle of the Muslims of the subcontinent for a separate homeland."
Dear Author, could you please give me some figures of Muslims of South India who migrated to Pakistan.......As a Muslim myself from Kerala, I have never heard either from my father or from grandparents even talking about the word Pakistan or any struggle to for a separate homeland for Muslims............the fact of the matter is Pakistan was created only for those Muslims of Indian subcontinent who wanted a separate nation........especially those from U.P, Bihar, West Bengal, etc.......Kindly spare us, don't include us in your nation building plan, which we were not......we are very much happy here in my homeland of Kerala.
ET, please allow this.....
@JohnUK: You can have your opinion but one care about it..... BTW soon your Britain will be an Indian or Chinese colony . Walk on the streets of London is another 15-20 years and we Indian will be a majority ! We have arrived in UK and will take over . watch out..
In my opinion, both India and Pakistan would have been better off under British colonialism.
In order to restore Quaid's legacy, we must get rid of the Punjabi establishment.
The country came into being as a result of a long and relentless struggle of the Muslims of the subcontinent for a separate homeland. ... a country, which on its birth was considered a ‘20th-century miracle’, and which was created entirely through a democratic and constitutional struggle, ... Well, who needs facts when you have imagination!
The most fundamental freedom anyone can have is the right to live his life according to his own wishes. This new system is called Ultimate Direct Democracy (UDD) and is being practically introduced. The Qaid delivered the system we can call Elected Representative Democracy (ERD) and it has failed miserably where ever it is practiced. You are wasting your time chasing failure.
Almost every Indian leader saw the wrings on wall as far as creation of Pakistan was concerned. Speeches of Patel and Abbul Kalam Azad are still available on youtube to prove the case. Basics do not support a peaceful Pakistan either internally or externally. Recent happenings are a clear proof that Pakistan is not cut for mature democracy. Pakistan has built too many contradictions in its body politics. Dual nationality, religious state, discrimination against minorities, role of army in foreign policy and hosts of other issues make Pakistan a unstable state.
At least Mr. Jinnah is remembered once a year. Mr. Jinnah was a dominant figure in the Muslim league. There were not many competent individuals at the top level, only opportunistic. On the other Congress had several, Patel, Azad, Dr. Prasad, and so on. As you correctly state, Pakistan missed the guiding hand of the founder (s) in its formative years.
...the foundations of Pakistan were made of lies....you erect a castle on lies....to bolster the original lies you furnish additional lies.....and the castle crumbles.... The claim Pakistan came about after "relentless struggle" is the hugest lie....what is a relentless struggle and against who? Can any one explain why Jinnah never saw the inside of a prison, never knew what suffering was....unlike Maulana Azad, Nehru and Gandhi who spent 10-15 years of their prime of life inside prison...often under brutal conditions... Moderator, you can block my comment. But ask your conscience.....