UN's Pillay says Israel may be committing war crimes

Pakistan calls for an immediate ceasefire and revival of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

APP/reuters July 23, 2014

GENEVA/JERUSALEM: Israel may have committed war crimes by killing civilians and shelling houses and hospitals during its two-week-old offensive in the Gaza Strip, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay said on Wednesday.

Pillay, opening an emergency debate at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, also condemned the indiscriminate firing of rockets and mortars by Palestinian militants into Israel.

Citing cases Israeli air strikes and shelling hitting houses and hospitals in the coastal enclave, she said, "These are just a few examples where there seems to be a strong possibility that international humanitarian law has been violated, in a manner that could amount to war crimes.”

"Every one of these incidents must be properly and independently investigated," Pillay said in some of her strongest comments on the conflict.

The Geneva rights forum convened the special one-day session at the request of the Palestinians, Egypt and Pakistan. Israel, which accuses the Council of bias, boycotted the Geneva forum for 20 months, resuming cooperation in October. Its main ally the United States, a member state, has also said Israel is unfairly singled out.

Pakistan's stance

During the session at the UN Human Rights Council, Pakistan called for the intensification of international diplomatic efforts for an immediate ceasefire and revival of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks aimed at addressing the root cause of the Middle East conflict.

"The relentless bloodshed must be stopped and peace talks initiated," Ambassador Masood Khan, Pakistan's permanent representative to the UN, told the Security Council on Tuesday while condemning Israeli aggression in Gaza.

Expressing solidarity with the Palestinian people, he said that a political solution must be achieved.

"International diplomacy initiated by Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, (US) Secretary of State John Kerry and Egyptian leadership must be intensified," he said.

Khan added that a ceasefire proposal should not be spurned and the two-state solution should be pursued.

"An independent, viable and geographically contiguous Palestinian State, on the basis of the pre-1967 borders, with Al Quds Al Sharif as its capital, living side by side with Israel, is the only way to guarantee peace and stability in the region," Khan suggested.

Furthermore, he demanded the immediate cessation of Israeli attacks, end to the blockade of Gaza, opening of its border and release of Palestinian prisoners.

Gaza truce efforts

US Secretary of State John Kerry said on Wednesday some progress had been made in efforts to bring an end to 16 days of fighting between Israel and Hamas.

"We have certainly made some steps forward. There is still work to be done," Kerry said shortly after arriving in Jerusalem for a meeting with UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

He declined to give any details.

Our Publications


Someone | 6 years ago | Reply

@p r sharma: What do you expect from Israel when rockets are fired from Hamas into Israel targeting the civilians.? should she sit tight. ? The response received by Palestinians was obvious and right.

What do you expect when India commits atrocities and human rights abuses in Kashmir. Should the oppressed sit tight? The response recieved by India is obvious and right. Attacks against Indian occupying soldiers in Kashmir are obvious and right. The Mumbai attacks were also obvious and right. There.

David | 6 years ago | Reply More fuzzy misdirected discussion. The Law of Land Warfare is clear that the occupying power is responsible for the safety of non-combatants (some civilians give up this status by their actions and some military are covered). The occupying power can declare an "open City" and cede the ground to the invading power if they cannot protect the non-combatants. In some circumstances it is necessary to warn noncombatants. In others it is not. All non-combatant casualties in Gaza are the legal responsibility of Hamas, until Israeli forces physically occupy the terrain. There is already international law in the Geneva Conventions that applies---vague humanitarian commentary and heartfelt sympathy for the trauma of warfare aside.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ