A few had an empty seat next to them. The effort that the staff was putting in to keep these as such suggested that they were facilitating travelling colleagues. And, why not! Judging by the large number of staff at Heathrow handling just one flight, there must be a lot of staff travel. With far fewer passengers, other airlines handle multiple flights. At the gates, one noticed a special deployment of the British security system. A lack of trust is apparent here. Safety seemed the least of the staff’s concern. Some two dozen passengers, women and children among them, had been allowed in the plane at the last minute. While the plane was taking off, with seat belt signs on, these people kept on opening and closing the overhead lockers to find suitable space for cabin baggage. In the process, they were running around the aisles. There was no attempt by the staff to stop them. A passenger trying to tell them to wait till after the takeoff was rudely told to shut up. His attempt to remind the staff about their duty only earned a rebuke to calm down. Throughout the flight, these passengers kept on moving here and there, with noise levels that kept other passengers awake for the better part of the night. Some staff was enthusiastically participating in this gup shup. The intermittent announcements to return to your seats and fasten your seat belts due to bad weather had no effect.

Does this strengthen the case for the privatisation of PIA? Not quite. All these are issues of managerial inefficiency. Ownership and management are two different things. Pan Am and TWA died despite being in the private sector because of managerial inefficiency. Singapore Airlines runs efficiently in spite of public ownership. Even Ethiopia has an efficiently running public sector airline. Managements are appointed by the governments or the owners. If the government appoints cronies whose knowledge of operational and financial efficiency is next to nothing, the resulting bleeding of the exchequer has to be blamed on the government. An independent board and management, operating on commercial principles in plane selection, route servicing, seat allocation and staff recruitment is the answer. Of course, the government has to clear the financial mess it created before handing it over to a new board.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 18th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ