The advent of the ’70s also saw the induction of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (ZAB) in Pakistan as its new leader. From a rather barren political landscape of the ’60s, he ushered in an era of idealistic politics based on a socialist liberal philosophy. If a democratic turn to Pakistani politics was really made where the common man became the centre of a political process, this was that moment. ZAB helped rewrite the social contract between the state and its people. ZAB was influenced by the anti-imperial fervour of the times which became evident when he modelled his party’s political structure to replicate the Chinese example. That he changed back to a more local flavour of politics by the end in no way takes away from the liberalism that ZAB espoused.
ZAB was not only a liberal political leader, he was a mentor of such strain in political thinking. Any tradition of liberal politics that survives in the popular stream in Pakistan is due to his commitment in developing the tradition that was carried forward through the equally iconic Benazir Bhutto; significantly paling in her later years, though. Benazir herself was the product of the socially tumultuous seventies and the political culture that went with it.
The period after was carried forward by academics of the quality and reputation of Dr Feroz Ahmed and the famous Eqbal Ahmed who were not only academics but thinkers of a separate class. Sadly, with the turn of the seventies began a culture that only saw an exodus of original thinkers from Pakistan’s intellectual landscape. What is now left is at best an impoverished imitation. Social liberals pose as counterculture revolutionaries, and espouse anti-religion and anti-military sentiment as the flagship of their version of liberalism. Beyond that the pail is hopelessly empty.
Within the vernacular domain the progressives were equally vibrant and active. Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi led this tribe. Saadat Hasan Manto, however, remains their perpetual guru and holds the place of pride in liberalist literature. The ’80s saw the dominance of the Rightist strain in literary leaning when Ashfaq Ahmed and Mumtaz Mufti practically dominated the landscape and popularised Sufi thinking that gave eminence to religious leanings.
How did the military fare in this journey of varying colours? It was almost impossible to escape the impact of sociopolitical developments as those evolved. Always the centrists, with predominantly liberal social leanings, there were only two blips that marked deviations: one was under Zia when the military went overtly Right, and the other under Bhutto when it wasn’t uncommon to appear Centre-Left, and behave as such. When Bhutto was hanged, the pain was more widely shared than is usually surmised.
Intellectual development within the military, though sporadic, continued in parallel with the more focused professional development. Habits in reading are a personal matter and the few that it touched developed parallel strains of thought that are intrinsic to such evolution of political and social beliefs. It is but natural then that there were people within the military who shared reasonably mature political sentiment with those on the outside.
The ’70s was also the time of a resurgent Faiz, and Faraz, and Munir Niazi who was a compatriot of Faraz, Faiz being a generation ahead of both. Each was a bohemian, and a master in his own right; Faiz a different class; such was the richness and fertility of the times. It was impossible not to be impacted by their presence. Munir Niazi, the most cold-hearted cynic ever, with bluntness to boot, and a tongue as incisive as a scythe, had this to say of his poetic colleagues: “jitna Faraz ne Faiz ko duhraya hai, utna Faiz ne bhi apnay aap ko nahin duhraya”. There you have it for exclusivity, most blatantly expressed, yet with a touch of class.
These were the masters at play, with one another and with their people, shaping opinions, setting standards and raising the bar of discourse. Here is another: when asked, who was the best poet of his times (asr), Munir Niazi was at his proverbial best — “mein hi hoon”; unabashed and without batting an eyelid. But importantly, assured in himself and his art; and he didn’t look vulgar saying that. The class, matchless. In the vulgarity of the modern times, in a lunar landscape, the Bollywood compatible is “mein hoon na”. Going by the naked animus that has now replaced class, if asked to choose between the two it is easy to imagine which way the pendulum will swing. We live in different times.
Tailpiece: Although intended as a reflection of the past, easy on the pate, this piece must still find mention of an impending development in Afghanistan: Ashraf Ghani has been declared the ‘tentative’ new leader of Afghanistan. As expected Abdullah Abdullah has trashed the declaration on the basis of ‘industrial-scale fraud’ committed against him. Three persons must find this emerging reality hugely interesting: Hamid Karzai, who may have had a hand in instituting such manipulation of the electoral process — with no credible choice he gets to prolong his tenure at the helm; Mullah Omar, who sees his chance again at wresting the centre stage in Afghanistan, if not an outright control of Kabul; and Abu Bakr alBaghdadi, the newly ordained Islamic State Caliph who sees the first possibility of internationalising his agenda for a transnational Islamic state when a developing vacuum in Afghanistan beckons his indulgence. That makes for a formidable list. Buckle-up world, and Pakistan. The ride of your life is about to begin, unless either Ghani or Abdullah make it easy upon us, and them.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 12th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
I enjoy this author's great writing skills but more than that, I enjoy the crass comments, devoid of any substance, particularly by the imbicile Indians who know nothing better than to spend endless hours on a Pakistani site.
With this author I find it easier to read the comments rather than the article to understand the gist - so thank you fellow respondents.
With due respect, its a flawed article. ZAB proved necessarily started a dynastic kleptocratic rule in Pakistan where the clergy and feudal ruled the country in the name of religion and people power respectively.
Joke of the day, Mullah Omar wresting Afghanistan. This guy is good for comic relief, every once in a while. Perennial mouthpiece of ISPR propaganda.
you don't need poets and thinkers, there is enough empirical evidence from around the world........ the pakistan military/political elite is unready for what humanity demands.......clean safe water....decent health care .....decent education system.......empowerment of women......family planning.....grass root democracy....
Woodstock is Ok Bollywood is not. Uhm!
@sidjeen: Exactly my reaction too. Anyone who can put Faiz & Munir Niazi in the same literary bracket has no business talking about poetry. He is a mouthpiece of the establishment disguising himself as an independent journalist minting money. As for Bhutto’s responsibility for Bangladesh, I have met literally 100s of Bengalis abroad. Not ONE has held Bhutto responsible! They blame Yahya & his gang plus the private armies of Jamaat. What about the Hamoodu-ur-Rehman report? Why has it not been released till today? Times have changed courtesy global media & communication explosion. Deluded narcissists like him should realise times have changed and you can no longer fool all the people all the time.
Beautiful prose as often, and the comparison between Main hi hoon, and, MAIN HOON NA is explicitly justified by the majority comments. More power to pen.
Eqbal Ahmed was considered in the league of Edward Said and Noam Chomsky and perhaps the only thinker who occupied space among the top intellectual and fearless minds of our times
I have always liked this writer. When he takes us through the strange world that he inhabits, it becomes a refreshing vacation from the usual burdens of facts, reality, and sense. His scholarship is not lacking in therapeutic value either, as it unfailingly raises a laugh. And he is a doughty warrior, taking on any topic, and never allowing ignorance to get in the way of strong expression. I may not remember a word of his ramblings the next minute, but I always look forward to the next laugh. May it not be too far away again!
In any society where there is pressure from the family and social milieu to conform, it is almost impossible for great or original thinkers to emerge. It needs a questioning and disruptive mind to liberate an individual from an closed and confined space and challenge dogma, ideology and narrative. That Pakistan has equipped itself with regressive pieces of legislation like the Blasphemy law and lately PPO, is a signal for citizens to stay away from questioning ideology and narrative, even though it promotes hatred and consequent violence. Jinnah's vision of a modern, plural and progressive Pakistan is a long way from fruition.
Why are u worried about sexual content in bollywood, keep your woman folks coveted in black tent on 45 degrees and watch pak tv.
Liberal in terms of drink, party and enjoy life but accompanied by feudal mindset which reeks of self entitlement and autocracy.
nice piece, but would like to add that Bhutto was not at all a liberal he pretended to be one but once he took hold of reigns he was an autocrat to the core.
ZAB: under his leadership, Pakistan adopted a new Constitution in 1974 and discrimination against non-Muslims and Ahmadiyas became codified into law. In addition, he refused to give up his claim to power in the 1970 elections which the Awami League won. Why is is so difficult to tell such "liberals" apart from extremists.
It was ZAB who divided Pakistan. Bad egoistic politician.
if their was an objective to this piece than i missed it completely and the tailpiece resembled more with the wishes of the author and the establishment of which he is the unofficial spokesperson rather than the reality on the ground.