But first, a bit of background. In 1988, the per capita income of the average Indian was 32 per cent lower than that of the average Pakistani. By 2012, the figures had reversed: the average Indian was 33 per cent richer than the average Pakistani, purchasing power parity terms, according to data from the World Bank. Even more depressing than that reversal? The crossover took place in 2005, a year that was supposed to be one of the best in Pakistani history for economic growth. Simply put: even our best was not good enough to keep pace with the rise of the Indian economy.
The steady, relentless rise of India’s economy started in the early 1990s, when the country was forced to admit the failure and unsustainability of a command-and-control, subsidy-dominated economic agenda and initiate market reforms. That unleashed a tsunami of Indian economic dynamism that propelled their economy forward into the ranks of the world’s largest, leaving Pakistan behind. It was not always so, and indeed, it does not necessarily need to be so.
While Pakistanis should forever banish the idea that our country will ever be as large or as important as India in economic terms, we can and should strive to compete on a per capita basis, especially when considering the fact that the average Pakistani was richer than the average Indian for most of our respective histories. While some of this is due to external support from the United States, much of the difference in the economic performance of Pakistan and India can be attributed to the fact that Pakistan has always had a slightly more open and liberal economy than India. As difficult as it is to be an entrepreneur here, it has historically been even more difficult on the other side of the Wagah.
Indeed, Modi was elected in a wave of popular support precisely because the Indian economy has not opened up nearly enough. The stalled pace of reforms led to a sharp slowdown in the pace of growth from the Indian economy (from eight per cent to just under five per cent, which is still impressive by Pakistani standards) and led to a demand from voters for change. To quote Sadanand Dhume from The Wall Street Journal, they responded to his “Thatcherite mantra of ‘maximum governance, minimum government.’”
As a Pakistani, my concern is not that Modi will be nasty to India’s Muslims. My concern is that he will continue to dismantle the sclerotic legacy of Nehruvian socialism and in turn vault the Indian economy to an even bigger lead ahead of Pakistan than it has now. I am, of course, happy for the prosperity that my Indian neighbours will enjoy if Modi succeeds. I am just afraid of my own country being left behind. We are not exactly good at dealing with economic resentment.
To their credit, the Nawaz leadership has avoided the kind of populist rhetoric that has been all too evident in the media. The prime minister himself appears dedicated to improving ties with India, in particular economic ties.
As the two countries move the dialogue forward, it will be important for Pakistani negotiators to focus on our core economic strengths. That means acknowledging that as trade opens up with India, some industries will benefit while others may suffer or even perish. As Modi takes office, Pakistanis should focus on the economic opportunity his inauguration represents, not any potential impact on civil liberties in India it may have. We do not exactly stand on the moral high ground when it comes to the treatment of minorities.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 21st, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (61)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
ET: in continuance to my comment to Rex Minor I'd like to add that you guys are no less fanatical as your Pakistani brothers commenting on this forum. How could you allow such a statement / comment infringing someone's belief or for that matter a revered figure in Hinduism? Its proven that the mindset is the same across the country - including the sahafi's!
@Rex Minor: Couldn't come up with a rebuttal therefore you insult someone on the basis of their faith? Hardly surprising; when your (your ilk on blogs and other public forums) backs are against the wall you resort to such words. True colors indeed!
Wait post swearing-in on the 26th. You will see for yourself the congratulatory messages pouring from your distant cousins.
Good article. The author seems to know Modi's mind. Most Pakistanis unncecessarily get riled at the thought of Modi as PM since they still carry the baggage of Gujarat riots in their minds. Modi has gone beyond that long ago. Even the muslims of Gujarat have put that incident behind them. A very large section of Gujarti muslims have voted for Modi in assembly and recent general elections. Modi's agenda is economic. That is also his mandate. If he is to pursue some other agenda, voters will not be forgiving. He will lost not only his popularity but also support of his sympathizers in BJP
@BRUISED INDIAN:
You are bruised with YESTERDAY, now you have a paymaster who is the high priest of RAM, no muslim country will risk any dieals with Ram. Too hot potato!
Rex Minor
@Naresh:
India has received 55 billion dollars aid from UK/US. (ref. NYtimes, Nov 15 2012). But still more poverty in India than Pk, why??
@Flint: @1984:India has less per capita doctors than pakistan. (world bank data) India has more poverty than Pakistan when compared at 2 Dollar international standard. (world bank data) . Also India's Begging Bowl is non-existent compared to the size and usage of Pakistan's Begging Bowl! . Cheers
@PRat: 20 years ago?
Well, while it is a shame that anyone who talks about progress should be talking about 6 months instead of 20 years ago...I will give you the benefit of the doubt and let me give you a clear picture...
go back 30 years ago, if you were old enough to understand the world by then and see what has changed for Dalits and Muslims...nothing.
@Flint: I agree with the first one but show me the proof for the second one just as I showed you proof from the world bank
@Gp65
"Hate-mongering and distorted facts". This coming from you is the joke of the century. That is all you and your supporters do here. Just read G Din's comment above for an example.
@1984: India has less per capita doctors than pakistan. (world bank data)
India has more poverty than Pakistan when compared at 2 Dollar international standard. (world bank data)
The author may not know this, few in India do as well, but a lot of the initial impetus of the original economic reforms in India were inspired by the work of Moeen Qureshi, who was a caretaker PM for some time.
Moeen Qureshi was not a politician, I don't even remember how or why he was made PM, but he liberalized capital inflows, dismantled a number of regulatory hurdles, and Pakistan saw a temporary surge in investment. However, there was no true political backing to these reforms, and once Moeen Qureshi was out, so were the reforms.
This is why Narasimha Rao's support for Reforms 1 were so crucial, and Sonia's lack of support in UPA2 meant that reforms stagnated.
Congratulations Mr Tirmizi! You have written what exactly is relevant and I like the way you have summed up the article: "We do not exactly stand on the moral high ground when it comes to the treatment of minorities." Unfortunately it is the treatment of minorities that is harked upon by many.
Your brain is much smaller than ur beard for sure....
@water bottle: you must visit indian villages then. I don't think you are old enough to have seen them 20 years back. otherwise difference in situation of dalits etc would have been by you till now.
@Flint: The same reason why there are more doctors,engineers,billionaires,diabetic patients in India than Pakistan.....
We have 6 times more people than you....Its simple math....
By the way,if we consider the percentage,then India's poverty in lesser than Pakistan if you consider the World Bank data......Also
http://data.worldbank.org/country/india
http://data.worldbank.org/country/pakistan
@bodie: Looks like you are afraid of hearing the truth.
@water bottle: We really don't care for gems of hate coming from Indian trolls. Keep your phony statistics in your Bombay call center. Same for all the other trolls working there. Every shift.
"While some of this is due to external support from the United States, much of the difference in the economic performance of Pakistan and India can be attributed to the fact that Pakistan has always had a slightly more open and liberal economy than India."
I disagree. One of the reasons why India's economy was less 'liberal' before 1990 was because Nehru et al. were big on 'self-reliance' - not allowing imports, while in Pakistan one could get anything from anywhere - brought by foreign money, of course.
The most damning thing in Pakistan's politics and economy is feudalism and a feudalistic mindset. It was also one of the major reasons for Partition - the big landlords were big donors to the Muslim league (because they didn't want to be a part of Gandhi's socialist India), and even now all the Bhuttos, Sharifs and anyone that matters politically in Pakistan belong to big landowning families.
Politics and economy go hand in hand. Unless a disadvantaged son of a tea seller can become a PM of Pakistan, the country will go from crisis to crisis, and will forever hold its begging bowl to the world. Unless a commoner is empowered, rather than the Army holding a third of the economy hostage, how can you expect economic progress?
@faraz: MFN is not the same as free trade which was given o Cina.It is non discriminatory market access. In reality, Pakistan is required to give MFN status to India in order to comply with terms of WTO membership. The fact that India has chosen o not complain to WTO about Pakistan's non-compliance and instead has tried to offer more goodies is simpy because India feels that if trade prospers, the focus on militance may reduce. Somehow this has given Pakistan the idea that India is desperate for MFN and it can be used as the perpetual carrot to get more and more things from India. You will find that the particular strategy is past the sell-by date. Unless and until Pakistan imolements what it has already agreed to, i doubt there is oing to be much interest in India to neotiate further.
this article is the most sensible and too perfect. We on the other side of the border would be interested to deal with some one like the author for trade and peace related issues.
@G. Din: Why there is more poverty and hunger in India, compared to Pakistan?
this article is the most sensible and too perfect. We on the other side of the border would be interested to deal with some one like the author for trade and peace related issues.
Q. 60% Pakistanis are below 2 Dollar poverty line; 80% Indians are below 2 Dollar poverty line. Why? ...... (Is India poorer than Pakistan?). Also the 2013 Global Hunger Index shows that there is more hunger in India than Pakistan !!!!, How come ???
Feels soooo goooood to read sensible stuff from a Pakistani. Thanks a lot dear author.
The latest results have shocked UPA and other parties , while it has surprised NDA for it to win on its own simple majority. This result was acheived single handedly by one man..on tall promises of economic growth, tackling inflation, employment generation, eliminating corruption etc. Hence new govt has a task cut out for itself . Days of sloganeering is over ..now its time for action by the new Govt. They made sensible begining of inviting SAARC leaders including PM of Pakistan (without any pre-condition). Had same thing done by Congress , same NDA leaders would have started howling and shouting on TV channels !! Lets hope for BEST..as Sanity comes in people once they leave Opposition bench and joins Treasury bench.
"... we can and should strive to compete on a per capita basis, ..." First, let me commend you on the overall tone of your piece. It is refreshingly surprising that it comes from a Pakistani. Now, let me invite your attention to your line above. When you say "per capita basis", the rational explanation of "per capita" would be "per productive person". In all Islamic countries, half of the population - women - comprise the pool of those who may in some small measure help but do not contribute to the creation of real wealth. So, if you are comparing two countries, one Islamic and the other non-Islamic, even with equal populations, the Islamic country does not even have a prayer of being able to compete with the non-Islamic country. Add to this scenario the abandon with which all Muslim societies proliferate and you have a recipe for very real disaster because the whole quality of its population will forever be headed south. Moral of the story: No Islamic country can ever dream of challenging a non-Islamic country in economic output, no matter what its size. Failure shall remain inbuilt in all Islamic societies until the Muslim woman is liberated from the bondage of the Muslim male, to be able to breathe free, to stand shoulder to shoulder with him, unintimidated, unbullied. Such a prospect is unthinkable in Islam and therefore Pakistan ever being able to outperform India will forever remain a chimera.
A beautifully written article.The author is right that it is the competitiveness in market that is going to make or break a society. Poverty is the bane of both our countries. Mandate that modi ji has received is get rid of poverty and we expect him to do just that in double quick time. If our two countries wish to take their rightful place in comity of nations, immediate actions are needed now.
I am all for good relations with India, but MFN will destroy our economy. Just look what happened to yarn producing units past few months
Loved your article, Mr Tirmizi. Yes we should work on our economy and economy only and forget about everything else.
Once we are a rich country, we can always buy Siachen, etc etc.
That was a sensible read.
Nice articles,,,, But 90% comments are from our neighbors. Seems ET and Pak Affairs are very popular in India.
The author has correctly predicted based on past performance that under Modi, economic growth will revive and the gap between India and Pakistan will widen. No one will argue with it. Pakistan's prosperity and growth is in its own hand, neither Modi or anyone else can influence it, same goes for India or any other country. Focus of both countries should be on economic issues because that alone can deliver a better tomorrow for citizens.
@Mega:
I don't think you understand lower/backward castes. In India there are lower castes and then there are lower castes.
The first is the lower caste of touchable, who have for centuries remained in small trades, agriculture etc.
The second is the lower caste of untouchables, who have for centuries remained laborers, masons, coolies, sweepers, cleaners etc.
The first group have been benefiting immensely from the government schemes because they are educated enough to understand and utilize these schemes. The second group has not moved from the way they were. Slums of every city are occupied by these people.
There are no Muslim/Dalit majority constituency in Gujrat. There are constituencies where Dalits/Muslims are in higher percentage than the national average. But they are not in majority.
Please stop misleading. Indian Dalits and Muslims are down in the dirt. They have not benefited anything from 20 years of development.
@Actualeconomist: I don't think this article intended to open a forum for deep policy-action discussion. I too am an "actual economist". The point of this article was to refocus the Modi v. Muslim discussion to a Modi v. Regional Economics discussion - concluding that the latter trumps the former. But... comment if you must.
@rex minor india's literacy rate 74percent. Pakistan's 54%. @watter bottle if growth hadn't reached Muslims and Dalits how come in Gujarat all Muslim Dalit constituencies of all bjp state government went to modi specially gujarat since 12years and not cong? Remember the fact modi himself is from lower caste he has best interest at heart for his own people.
http://www.theindianrepublic.com/tbp/interview-sufi-m-k-chisty-national-secretary-bjps-national-minority-wing-100036558.html?utmsource=taboola&utmmedium=referral
@Rex Minor: The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) found an anncient temple beneath the Babri ruins. Why then did the waqf not resolve this amicably?
About India imploding, you certainly have no idea of how it is in India right now. Modi has united Indians of all hues. I am a South Indian and a Christian and here in the south generally there is a palpable feeling that we Indians are one.
@Rex Minor: People of India voted Modi to power fully knowing his credentials. The world knows India is a democracy where elections are held free and fair. All leaders of the world including yours did the sane thing by reaching out to him. We all hope India and Pakistan under the new leadership will find ways to lay foundation for a long lasting friendly relationship.
@Rex Minor: Are you a spokesperson of Saudi?If so what is your official status??If not your problem is nothing but delusion of grandiosity and persecution which will lead to schizophrenia.Good treatment can improve your condition.tc,a well wisher
@Gp65: let this Minor enjoy his juvenile dreams or delusions must i say...
Dear Author,
The Indians Voted NaMo exactly for this reason. All the 3 sectors - Agriculture, Industry & Service Sectors are consistantly growing at 10+ rate in NaMo's Gujrat..
Indians are unfortunately blinded by the figures of 9% and 10% growth.
This 9% is going to the pockets of Ambanis and Adanis and a small drops is trickling down to the middle class.
To the Dalits and Muslims, nothing is reaching. They are as poor today as they were 50 years ago.
The trickle down economy is a sham. Just because it came from the world bank doesn't mean we have to believe in the hogwash.
There have been about 20 OpEds in RT alone after Modi led NDA swept Indian elections. Barring the one from from Yaqoob Bangash most were focused on hate mongering and deliberately distorted facts. This is onky the 2nd OpEd on this subject which shows an understanding of the dynamic that played out in India.
Look out for Indian trolls stampede.
If pakistan had that much sense it wouldn't be in condition it is today in. While in india we are looking ahead to a person who may solve our economy woos that have come down from 9 to 5% . Pakistan is busy interfering in other countries religion/peoples matter while conveniently blinking over its own.
The author has written a very pleasant essay, put together in a nice package with bits of statistics and should,get good notes from the Professor. Now to the real world mr Modi was elected by the millions who have not the work or not paid enough for the liveihood of the families. People wanted a change and he had the experience good management in his province. Besides, he had a well organised campaign by media experts and including the social media. He has promised to built more toilets but can he feed the largest number of unnourished children on this planet and find jobs for the largest illetrate population on this planet(UNO reports)? India is on the verge of implosion, the corruption at every beaurocratic step in chronic state, the India billionaires opting to invest in Europe and beyond but not in domestic market. Unless the house of Saud do not consent, the USA administration will not allow him the entry. Mr Modi must announce in clear language to disassociate from those who perpatrated the carnage on muslim citizens, destroying their mosques including the Babri Mosque. Failing which, Indian industry will be denied oil deliveries from the Saudi or Iranian fields. The Prme Minister of pakistan better show prudence and care not to appease.
Rex Minor
I agree with you author on all assessment. However, one point I would like to defer. Without American financial aid, we would be nowhere where we are compared to india. Yet we lead on the list of countries hating America. Our much touted ally China has given us peanuts.
We have been prosperous in the past relative to India simply because Punjab has been our core. Before or after economic reforms, Punjab has been prosperous on either side.
India will take Pakistan along with it. I am absolutely confident in that.
Modi will shed the old paradigm writing by west on split and conquer. India will want to jettisoin old ideas, build strong India with strength and ensure neighbours are hurled together. Not alone.
No family prosper when one alone is rich and rest saddled. Same way, with nations too.
May be little blunt but with tough love.
India needs Pakistan to bring the extended neighbourhood together for long term growth. So does Pakistan need India to have more balanced, top to bottom growth.
It is important that writes write positive though things may not be that rosy. Essential for positive thinking and integration.
Even if you look at things on a per capita basis, remember that Pakistan's birth rate is much higher than that of India. As such, per capita comparison will also become even more challenging with time. Time to have fewer capitas.
Many were skeptical before even if BJP comes to power and Modi is PM,it will be difficult to initiate reforms because of coalition politics. Now that BJP itself has full majority in Parliament and with it's allies combined 335, Modi has a completely free hand. During the golden era of Atal Bihari Vajpayee when he had to handle 20 parties to run the government, Indian economy was booming on many fronts. When they lost in 2004, Congress reaped the benefits of BJP economic policies and claimed the Indian growth story as their own.
Here is one reason why BJP was elected with full majority atleast from perspective of the youth. The Congress party which many Pakistanis are in love with don't give two hoots about economy. All they care is giving out doles after doles to secure their vote bank. BJP on the other hand don't like giving out doles unless it's really necessary. They believe in creating wealth and jobs. FACT : During rule of Vajpayee of 5 years,BJP created 60 million jobs compared to 3 million during 10 years of Congress rule. Modi is surrounded with very bright people and Arvind Panagariya one of the best economists in the world not to have won the noble prize. But the mess created by Congress might take time to clean up. But one thing is for sure, he is going to unleash the potential of Indian economy on all fronts.
@ Pakistanis We Indians are coming not with guns or Tanks,but with talent and Brains. Look out for September, maybe we will script our place in history has one of the countries who successfully sent a mission to Mars.
Good to see that some "learned" people are writing articles where they are concerned about the future of their country rather than fearing of a dystopian Muslim holocaust in India....
Pakistan in 1960s were vibrant because of the investment made by USA and also the fact that they got the fertile Sindh and Brahmaputra valley,while the mills went to Indian side.. However,they were too short sighted to remove the feudalism which India dismantled first when they got independent...
Unless Pakistan root out feudalism and provide protection to their citizens and thereby their investments.I can predict that by 2030,the per capita between India and Pakistan will be similar to South and North Korea...
The work is worth appreciation...Some more info...The currant Government fought election in the plank of development and development only.....There was no muslim prejudice involved...either by Modi or BJP as repeatedly told by many Newspapers...The so called secularists were unable to prove the point to the minorities that BJP or modi was communal .....Surely many of them did not vote.becoz of the fear psychosis and hysteria generated. The modi government has said that equal opportunities will be provided to all indians ..economic opportunities will be given to all including muslims...Development and employment generation will remain foremost and hence the reason india will jump start again .thre will also be good relations with Pakistan..do not worry..
No, no, no!! You are not allowed to make sense and be reasonable. You cannot talk just as a Pakistani, and forget that we have a 'theka' for everyone in our Ummah. Are we Islam ka Qhaas Qila for nothing?
Let me dismantle Mr. Tirmizi's argument, yet again. Several GTAP Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models have explored the impact of liberalizing trade between India and Pakistan. Most show that this would lead to a deterioration of terms of trade for Pakistan. That doesn't mean we would never be able benefit from mutual trade. But our export product mix needs further diversification for that to take place. Mr. Tirmizi's gross oversimplification is disingenuous at best and misleading at worst.
So the real idea behind the ominous title is "jealousy". I do not quite understand why educated Pakistanis should see "threat" in every opportunity. Deep paranoia I suppose.
One of the only two rational op-eds on the election of Modi! Congratulations to the author!