Ceasefire violation: Indian forces fire across LoC for second day

This is the fourth ceasefire violation in the last three weeks.


Web Desk May 12, 2014
Pakistani army lodges a protest with Indian authorities over unprovoked firing at Bhattal Sector of LoC. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE

RAWALPINDI: Indian forces continued firing at the Bhattal Sector of the Line of Control (LoC) for the second day today, Express News reported on Monday.

In the first incident, small arms and mortars were used by the Indian forces but the Pakistani troops responded swiftly to the offense, a military official said.

Despite this, the Indian forces continued firing at the sector after midnight on May 12.

This is the fourth ceasefire violation in the last three weeks. On April 25, after almost three months of calm, the two armies accused each other of breaching the ceasefire agreement following mortar shelling and firing in the Poonch Sector on the LoC. Three days later, the two sides exchanged fire again.

According to Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR), the Pakistan Army had lodged a protest with the Indian authorities on Sunday over what is said to be the third violation of the Pakistan-India 2003 ceasefire agreement in the last three weeks.

Military officials said the army protested after the Indian troops resorted to unprovoked firing after midnight on May 11, at the Bhattal Sector of the LoC.

No casualties or damage to property have been reported so far.

COMMENTS (15)

cheap Nets 2014 jerseys | 9 years ago | Reply The new style of Raiders jerseys cheap in our authentic website online, not only best quality guarantee provided ,but also free shipping for all customers.
Sid | 9 years ago | Reply

Its terrorism export season in Pakistan. Historically Pakistan has send terrorists across border soon after Spring when snow melts. This show is expected and here to stay until winter. So stay tuned for more heat during summer.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ