All societies now do recognise that free speech or expression cannot be limitless. Like any other freedom, there are also risks of media-related freedoms being abused at times, resulting in misrepresentation, blackmail, defamation or vilification. No wonder, there is now universally a strong case for the media itself realising the limits within which it should use its new-found freedom. It has immutable legal, moral, cultural and ethical obligations towards respecting the freedom of the public as individuals or even as groups or society as a whole and concomitantly towards the state and its institutions.
With more and more corporate conglomerates buying up independent news outlets, broadcasters are becoming less and less accountable to the public and as a consequence, fewer independent voices and perspectives are to be heard. An increasingly concentrated media ownership system in our country has had a negative impact on the quality of news and information that we receive about the nation and the world. There are instances, globally as well as in our own country, of growing abuse of media power to influence the political and cultural scenes. Foreign-funded NGOs and some media houses are the convenient buccaneers in our vast open field.
Those of us who remember the classic fairy tale movie, The Wizard of Oz, might see in it some allegorical resemblances with our times today. Its main character, Dorothy Gale, is a young, helpless, good natured adopted orphan girl snatched up by a Kansas tornado and deposited in a ‘fantasy land of witches’. When she and her companions finally reach the palace of the Wizard, and in the main hall, a huge head faces them, talking, breathing fire and smoke and holding the appalled but rapt attention of those who look upon his face.
That is until a curtain is moved and we find that the Wizard is actually a little wimpy old man who just works levers from behind the scene and pushes buttons to make the huge head talk and move. “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain” the Wizard yells into a microphone, hoping the huge talking head will make Dorothy and her companions ignore the reality and instead, concentrate on the illusion. As in the Wizard of Oz, our people today are also transfixed on the talking heads in our own Wizard boxes day and night, in countless talk shows and regular news bulletins.
And Pakistan’s news media, especially the electronic media, understands completely how much power they now have over the minds of the masses, even those who say ‘they just don’t trust the media’. By using graphic images, focusing on everything they want you to see and hear, shaping events by reporting only on those that they choose, they control an empire that is often projected as a ‘fourth pillar’ of the state. And, a part of this ‘empire’ has been conducting itself like a state within the state. It already meddles in politics, distorts history and culture and lays down its own double standards of freedom to determine what it will or will not print.
No doubt, the reach of the media and its impact on the general public is increasing and in an ill-governed country, domestically as unstable and unpredictable as ours where there is no rule of law, too much of freedom has its own hazards. With increasing media influence and authority over public minds, vested foreign and local interests are using money and muscle power to gain control over the media, which is fast becoming a commercial enterprise rather than being driven by public good. The recent developments in the country are an eye opener. Too much of commercialism is unhealthy and must be reined in.
If the media is to function responsibly as the ‘fourth pillar’ of the state and continue its commitment to transparent governance, informed democracy and national responsibility, there is urgent need for media houses to set up mechanisms for monitoring and accountability that discourage irresponsible reporting while taking note of public incitements to violence or hate speech. They must have a clear enforceable code of ethics with appropriate restrictions imposed by law in the interest of the country’s raison d’etre, independence, integrity, security and defence.
Surely, freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right guaranteed by our Constitution. But Article 19 clearly lays down the limits to the exercise of this freedom which remains subject to “reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of the glory of Islam or the integrity, security or defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, commission of or incitement to an offence.” It is time our media owned its national responsibility by adhering to the constitutional provisos.
Unfortunately, in recent years, there have been instances with some parts of the media even questioning the very raison d’être of Pakistan and also seeking to vilify the armed forces of the country in total breach of Article 19 of the Constitution as well as the Press Council of Pakistan’s Code of Ethics. Last year, a case in point was the prominent op-ed space given by an English daily claiming ‘guardianship’ of our ideology to an Indian maverick’s viewpoint questioning the very raison d’être of Pakistan and boasting that in 15-20 years, it will again be part of India. We seem to have become totally insensitive to our own existence.
It is time we rose above personal and commercial interests and valued the intrinsic strength of our national interests to safeguard our freedom and dignity. The armed forces must be kept above personal reproach. The government has a responsibility to build, on a priority basis, a public and legislative consensus on the red lines for print as well as electronic media in exercising its freedom. This will save us many a known crisis.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 26th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (9)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Media on its own will never come up with necessary measures,it want unbridled freedom.There are many examples of media going overboard even in developed societies.Nowhere media corporations can be allowed to become complainant,prosecutor and judge or a 'government dictating policies to be followed'.The media is allowed to express its opinion freely and without fear but in the process should not consider itself the people or assume the role of people. A reader has commented that it is an industry, ok, but monoply or cartel is not allowed in an industry and needs to be regulated and stopped. The government must step in and enforce measures to bring sanity.Otherwise, the state will be a big loser and chaos will reign.Already,the rule of law is extremely weak in the country.
Can you imagine the US military trying to shut down a news outlet because it was being criticized? Criticism of state institutions hasn't hurt the USA or any of the Western countries and they have stronger military's and democratic institutions - ample evidence that free speech doesn't harm the military or the State. It's one thing to be afraid of the ISI - it's another to be pimping their agenda.
@Feroz:
Freedom of speech does not mean free speech!
Rex Minor
Dear writer, went through your opinion. It is interesting to read your views but you are not taking me to the point of agreement. Yes, when I was a journalism student I still remember how our teacher focused the "ethics" of journalism and "media law". That had a specific circle for journalist to work in. Where defense of the country, military, independence and heroes were taken as noblest.
One thing push me ask Mr. writer, our constitution is supreme and it states that "parliament" is supreme and rest of the institutions must be sub-servant to parliament. Has our army and spy agencies followed the country's constitution? Hasn't our military violated the constitution for several times [Gen: Ayub, Gen: Yehya, Gen: Zia, Gen: Musharaf]? Has individual or institution asked them?.... Aren't we [the guys with in the army] busy to give a safe passage to violator of law ex president Gen: Pervez Musharaf?...
Yes, I am agree with you that media should follow code of conduct and the law of "freedom of speech" provided by the constitution of Pakistan. Dear sir, can you write your next article on the second issue I have reminded you?... Thank you I will be waiting.
If you can't, it means one institution is violating the constitution then why should the other follow?... let the anarchy be our fate and terror our practice.
P.S: explaining the role of foreign aid and NGO's linkage with our media houses. Isn't our army having secret military and strategic relations with world armies?.... If our media houses are having fund from abroad aren't we begging around the world to have military aid?....
That amounts to censorship. Everything should be open to debate, including religion. Once you start drawing lines, it is very easy to start manipulating these as well,
2nd attempt-revised;
Fata Morgana comes to mind when one looks at Pakistan constituion, its democracy and its institutions, and its civilian and military joint hold over the people, with target killing of Pakistan journalist.
The Government which uses military force against its citizens is a Junta, said Putin this weak. Pakistan needs an Alpha Prime Minister who directs and leads the country and not simply a business CEO and Economic Minister!
Rex Minor
Sir, free speech means free speech, not speech which suits us. The only free speech not allowed is of hate and inciting violence, which the Government has wantonly turned a blind eye to. Sugar coating a call for Media oversight can fool nobody, there should be no holy cows to protect in the name of free speech.
Sir , I totally agree with you as nothing is limitless .No one should make this country ideology debatable.
I hope I understood you correctly that you wish the government to step in. The perception is that whenever the government ' steps-in ' things go from bad to worse. The press / media is an industry that comprises of learned people.......at best the government should insist that they put their heads together and come up with a solution. What ever they come up with would be better that something produced by government bureaucrats.