‘Big Three’ close in on cricket’s throne

Gentleman’s game set to return to old ways with BCCI, ECB and CA in full force.

LONDON:

For much of its history, the International Cricket Council (ICC) was unable to do anything without the approval of England and Australia.

So the announcement from the ICC’s headquarters in Dubai on Wednesday that it had agreed in principle to be effectively run by India, England and Australia had a familiar ring to it.

Plans to bolster the position of the ‘Big Three’ within the ICC include the formation of a new executive committee, with three seats reserved for the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) and Cricket Australia (CA).



Given the greater BCCI influence due to its financial clout, the only other major boards to consistently turn a profit CA and ECB were asked to join hands.

Prior to this week’s Board meeting in Dubai, a leaked ‘position paper’ from the ‘Big Three’ suggested they be spared relegation in any new two-division Test set-up.

But in a statement released after the first day of talks on Tuesday, there was no mention of promotion and relegation, with the ICC declaring there would be “participation based on meritocracy; no immunity to any country, and no change to membership status”.

That promotion and relegation was conceded by the ‘Big Three’ suggests it was always something to be given away in return for acceptance of more fundamental points.

That appears to be what has happened with Bangladesh, whose Test status has been repeatedly called into question on the back of a string of defeats.

With major constitutional changes to the running of the ICC requiring a three-fourths majority – that is eight of the 10 leading nations – it now seems the ‘Big Three’ are one vote away from getting support for their revamp plan.

West Indies, who forecast they would receive a hundred percent increase in revenue as a result of the changes, and New Zealand, both appear to be onside.

That leaves the ‘Big Three’ needing to win over just one of South Africa, Pakistan and Sri Lanka – the three most vocal opponents – when the ICC reconvenes for another meeting next month.

Atherton tears into Richardson

On Tuesday, current ICC Chief Executive David Richardson proclaimed, “I am looking forward to bringing to fruition some of the principles that have been proposed and accepted”.

That brought a mocking response from former England captain Michael Atherton who, writing in The Times, declared the former South Africa wicketkeeper a “chief executive without a shred of executive power, and chief executive of a body with no function”.

There is no guarantee the ‘Big Three’ will remain a settled unit, given the political and even racial tensions that have often seen India involved in bitter arguments with England and Australia.

But an alliance based on cold, hard cash may last for a while yet given that the enduring lesson of modern sport is ‘follow the money’.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 31^st,  2014.

Like Sports on Facebook, follow @ETribuneSports on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.