Nuclear power: ‘K-2, K-3 nuclear reactors more safe than Fukushima’

All seismic fault lines near the plants are inactive, says expert.

Our Correspondent January 24, 2014
All seismic fault lines near the plants are inactive, says expert. PHOTO: FILE

KARACHI: Reactors of the Karachi nuclear power project - K-2 and K-3 - are more safe and sophisticated than those of Fukushima, said its project director Azfar Minhaj.

Minhaj and his colleagues from Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC), including Scientific Information and Public Relations director Shahid Riaz Khan, were briefing the media at the PAEC Office on Thursday.

 photo AzfarMinhaj_zpsef2f2a48.jpg

They were answering the queries of writers, civil society members and NGOs on the safety of the 2200-megawatt plants, which the government is building along the Karachi coast near the Karachi Nuclear Power Plant.

In his presentation, Minhaj said that they have conducted many studies of the site to ensure that the plants could survive the largest earthquake and tsunami that can be expected in the region. “The highest tsunami height expected in Karachi is about 2.8 metres above sea level, while the K-2 and K-3 ground level is 12 metre above the mean sea level,” he said, adding that they have collected all the instrumental, historical data of earthquakes in the history of Karachi.

They have also examined the ground but there is no history of major earthquakes in Karachi. He said that all seismic fault lines near the plants are inactive. “We have hypothetically assumed a 602-kilometre fault line near the city. If it gets ruptured, it will not affect the plant,” he said.

“Our plant is at 12-metre height and our electricity generation sources are at elevated levels. We have the mobile diesel electric generator ready and the plants have the passive emergency power supply and cooling water systems for 72 hours. In case of water storages, we can use fire water tanks for cooling.”

According to Minhaj, the ‘ACP1000’ system proposed for the K-2 and K-3 plants, which is a third generation reactor with enhanced security measures and capabilities, is safer and more sophisticated than the Fukushima. The ACP1000 is a ‘Pressurised Water Reactor’ and has been used in the nuclear industry for the past five decades. He said that China is constructing 29 nuclear power plants in its country and the plant at Chashma is imported from China and has been working efficiently for the past 14 years.

 photo Theplants_zpsea9a77bc.jpg

China has also provided loans for Chashma plants. For the K-2 and K-3, it is providing $6.5 billion loan on soft terms.

Minhaj refuted the claim that the whole city would have to be evacuated in case of an accident or a complete meltdown of the plants. According to him, in the case of an accident, the population within the five-kilometre radius will be evacuated and they have prepared plans for it.

“We will extend the evacuation plan till 15-kilometre radius which covers the area till Gulbai and population up to 100,000.” He also said that they have sufficient stalk potassium iodide tablets for the population in case of an emergency. “Pakistan Army, provincial and national disasters management authorities and local administration and traffic police are in loop in case of emergency evacuation. We have made our plans according to our own census and survey in the area.” He added that locality near the plant is thinly populated and the PAEC has acquired a land within 1.5 kilometre radius to halt any construction there.

The plants are resistant to terrorist attacks and designed to take a commercial plane crash without letting it to penetrate through. “The plant has double-shell containment. Its outer shell is strong enough to stop attacks like 9/11,” he said, adding that they have strong physical security system more secure than that of the General Headquarters and guarded by 920 officials.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 25th, 2014.


UKPak | 7 years ago | Reply

what about when you want to decommission the reactor in the future... It might actually be unfeasible. You Know how much sellafield is costing us in the UK to decommission? 70 Billion pounds!!!

luvdat! | 7 years ago | Reply

@Abdul Hameed: Ha ha ha ha! That was good but... A mad man could not be an expert on statistics & probability... He must be the captain himself or his accountant or the canon projectile expert.

The aftermath of nuclear accident in a poor third world country would be more horrific than a lab waste bag ripped open in a crowded bus. Or worst... The bus fall into a pool of that.

Responsible citizen would do a study of Both Russian & Japanese nuclear plant disasters for precaution and safety preparation.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read