![pakistan s landscape is littered with too many semi completed projects that serve only as monuments to the fickleness of the nation s development agenda photo mohammad noman file pakistan s landscape is littered with too many semi completed projects that serve only as monuments to the fickleness of the nation s development agenda photo mohammad noman file](https://i.tribune.com.pk/media/images/658170-DevelopmentprojectPHOTOMOHAMMADNOMANEXPRESS-1389551237/658170-DevelopmentprojectPHOTOMOHAMMADNOMANEXPRESS-1389551237.jpg)
Development spending in Pakistan is notoriously short-sighted, with administrations from both major parties seeking to implement projects that they can take credit for and shut down those that their political rivals initiated. The problem with this approach is that half-finished projects benefit nobody but have already sucked up much of the expenditure they were allocated. Effectively, the money spent on them is a complete waste. Given how the development budget is always the first to take a cut, and given the appalling state of the nation’s infrastructure, this fantastic waste of the taxpayers’ money is completely unaffordable. We recognise that elections have consequences and that the PML-N has the right to implement a development agenda of its choosing (and call it whatever it likes). But we also believe that, given the paucity of funds, the Nawaz Administration should continue projects that are being run well, even if they do not mesh with its own agenda. Pakistan’s landscape is littered with too many semi-completed projects that serve only as monuments to the fickleness of the nation’s development agenda. They do not weaken any party’s political opponents, but they do strengthen the cynicism of the Pakistani voter. And that is a loss to all elected officials.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 13th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (1)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Rather than talking in generalities and shooting in the dark it would have been better to give examples of few good projects that are being considered to be dropped.