In a candid, mostly off-the-cuff, hour-long speech at a Pakistan embassy event in Washington this October, Mr Sharif mentioned his two-word counter-terrorism strategy: economic growth. Growth — done the grand old-fashioned way, with investments in industry, technology and infrastructure — is Mr Sharif’s magic bullet. I did my doctorate in Economics, so I realise the value of economic growth, but also know its limits. Motorways and metrobuses, bullet trains and investment zones, laptops and tablets are all very well (though some are more useful than others), but they will not make militancy disappear. The prime minister is assuming that poverty is the root cause of terrorism. That is, being poor and destitute makes people resort to terrorism. So, his thinking goes something like this (I presume): our government will focus on growth. Growth will, in turn, reduce poverty (which, by the way, is not always true). Fewer poor people will mean fewer terrorists and less terrorism. Problem solved. Right? Wrong.
It should not be news to you, Mr Prime Minister, that terrorism in Pakistan has very little to do with economic circumstances. In fact, this is true the world over and a wealth of empirical research shows that terrorists are not especially economically deprived and neither are those who support or sympathise with terrorists. The simple-minded thinking for Pakistan’s case is that the poorest of the poor send their kids to madrassas, where they are brainwashed and then these poor, brainwashed kids go on to become terrorists. There is some truth there. But the root of the problem is not these poor children — it is the radical ideas they are taught. Militancy in Pakistan is essentially a war of ideas and narratives, and it is completely naive to think that you can ‘buy’ your way out of it through growth. What needs tackling is the radical narrative.
How is the radical narrative countered? Not by the usual half-hearted, play-it-safe condemnations of attacks which fail to name the perpetrators, nor by proposing peace talks with militants. It is countered with both hard power (yes, some sort of an offensive) and soft power, by offering up a peaceful, powerful counter-narrative that rebuts the radical narrative point-by-point and promotes tolerance. Long-term, the soft power must necessarily include a deep education sector and curriculum reform.
Countering the radical narrative also means that the interior minister does not lament the death of those responsible for killing thousands of innocent Pakistanis. It means that the political leadership spells out that the biggest menace to Pakistan is homegrown terror, and that this is Pakistan’s war — no one else’s. It means that banned organisations are not allowed to hold rallies in the light of day (or night). It means that the government shows true solidarity with religious minorities by joining the human chain with their Christian brothers and sisters at St Anthony’s Church in Lahore one week after the Peshawar church bombing.
So Mr Prime Minister, simply lamenting your problems and wishing them away, with great sincerity and good intentions, will not make them disappear. It is time for you to remove your blindfold, to widen your vision and realise that you run more than Pakistan’s economy, to acknowledge the real root of the terrorism problem and to tackle it head on. I dearly hope that you are up to the task.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 10th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Sabi Civilian leaders are responsible for this mess. Ayub Khan was the best thing that ever happened to Pakistan.
Ungrateful Pakistanis have forgotten who laid down their lives during the 1965 war.
Indians should thank the Bhuttos and the Sharifs for crippling Pakistan to its present condition. Even if we had let Musharaff remain in charge with all his follies, he still ran a better govt then the PPP/PML-N Govt.
@Shahbaz Asif Tahir:
Sane and PTI? Quite the contradiction.
Hey, we are being too harsh on the poor PM. Of course he has a vision. Vision for himself! and no he is not selfish, he also cares about the rest of the Sharifs! If US stops aid, who will fund their palaces and castles, and fancy cars and million dollar wrist watches?
Nice article and nicely spelt out. The common consensus seems to be that Nawaz Sharif just does not have what it takes firstly to understand what is wrong and even if he did, he does not have the clout to correct it.........and the drift continues.
When our govt. see all pakistani in same mirror & thinks pakistan as his own country & have eager to change pakistan from a no go area to a pakistan as a rising nation than they can achieve some thing otherwise plz accept pakistani state as a failed state.
@Shahbaz Asif Tahir: Not Muslims. The majority of sane people in Pakistan (from all communities) support PTI. Indeed one of my favorite and most respected PTi representatives remaiunsn Brigadier Samson Sharaf, Sercretary Defence, PTI.
very well said ! gone are the days when raising voice was nothing but utter frustration. Now social media and a simple hashtag spreads it all. MAking a polite and naive expression face wit hinnocent expressions and sounding like a cute-premier is pre-21st century. Mr Premier , you need to think the problems as they are not going under the carpet since your advicing team includes the same out-dated flaterring faces who never let you complete your term!
@sabi: Story of Pakistan since independence.
A few days back I happened to meet a recently retired brigadier.Short conversation., Me:It is said army is not fighting with Taliban but giving them protection why? Brig: Why not!-India is our enemy and off course Talibans are our assets.should we cut our hands?. Me: But India is not fighting with us why we call her enemy. Brig: India is stealing our water and fighting proxy war in Baluchistan. Me: Isn't it the job of civilians to decide who is enemy and who not. Brig: No civilians can not be trusted. Me: Why? Brig:They are corrupt and incompetent to look after national security matters. Brain washed folk is not ready to hear counter narative,one discribed by civilians.
Nawaz Sharif, won the elections through massive rigging. The majority of sane Muslims, from Pakistan, support Tehreek Insaf.