UN warns 1.3m people in Africa need food aid ahead of sanctioned military action

"In Central African Republic, 1.3 million people are in need of emergency food assistance due to civil unrest": FAO.


Afp December 05, 2013
"In Central African Republic, 1.3 million people are in need of emergency food assistance due to civil unrest," the Rome-based Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) said in a report on world cereal production and needs. PHOTO: REUTERS

ROME: The United Nations on Thursday said that as many as 1.3 million people in the Central African Republic needed food aid, as the UN Security Council backed an African and French military intervention to halt growing deadly unrest.

"In Central African Republic, 1.3 million people are in need of emergency food assistance due to civil unrest," the Rome-based Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) said in a report on world cereal production and needs.

The figure, which represents more than a quarter of the country's total population, was up from an assessment of 1.1 million provided by the UN a month ago.

The report also issued a food warning for five Sahel countries further West - Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Niger and Senegal - saying that crops and pastures had been affected by a delayed and short rainy season.

"The situation could lead to a new surge in food insecurity and malnutrition," it said.

The organisation said that continued civil conflicts had created "severe food insecurity" for six million people in Syria and 4.5 million in Yemen.

The report said world cereal production in 2013 is expected to reach a new high of 2,500 million tonnes - almost 8.4 per cent more than last year and six per cent higher than the previous record in 2011.

It said food prices had remained stable, with the FAO Food Price Index averaging 206.3 points in November compared to 206.6 points in October.

COMMENTS (1)

khjunaid | 10 years ago | Reply

UN gives the new dimensions to the world.........

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ