The answer to the first question is, yes. After all, Pakistan has the world’s largest integrated irrigation system in the world, the largest copper deposits and along with it, the second largest gold deposits in the world with considerable but as yet un-quantified coal and gas deposits. At the same time, it has a large and predominantly young population that has great potential talent, occasionally demonstrated by outstanding individuals in the social, political, cultural, intellectual and scientific fields. This is not surprising because the Pakistan area has had flourishing urban centres for 7,000 years. It has also been a crucible of diverse civilisations through immigration from Central Asia, West Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Europe. As a consequence of the associated genetic diversity, the people of this country have not only considerable cerebral capabilities but also have a cultural diversity that if nurtured, can enrich its intellectual, political and economic life.
The question of how to place Pakistan on the path of prosperity can be addressed by rethinking prosperity in terms of providing opportunities to all of the people rather than only a few, to develop their capabilities. In so doing, the vast human resources would be brought into play for the economic, social and cultural development of the country. So, the idea of prosperity must be made inseparable from the idea of equity.
The pursuit of this goal involves understanding development as transformation. This has five dimensions: first, an honest leadership that can articulate a transformative development strategy and pursue it with single-minded determination.
Second, as the experience of the ‘rise of the South’ shows, the state has a key role to play. But this cannot be done by incompetent and grabbing hand kind of state organisations. The bureaucracy has to be reformed to ensure professionalism, efficient performance, carefully aligned incentives, systematic evaluation and clear, time-barred goals.
Third, a change in the institutional structure must be undertaken to enable the middle classes and the poor, rather than just the elite, to engage in investment, high wage employment and innovation. Thus, equity can be built into the growth process. I have indicated the required policy measures for this in some detail in my earlier articles in this newspaper and academic papers elsewhere.
Fourth, the universal provisioning of education, health care and social protection should become a top priority. An educated, healthy and socially secure labour force is the key to productivity increase and economic growth. Universal provisioning of basic services will also give citizens a stake in citizenship and help achieve social cohesion. Recent research shows that a more cohesive society can achieve higher long-term GDP growth than a less cohesive society. The financing of these basic services for the people can be done by saving public resources at present being wasted in three areas: a) financing the losses of public sector entities amounting to about Rs500 billion annually. These need to be privatised on a fast track; b) the funds generated through these asset sales can be used to retire some of the short-term debt, and thereby, save on debt servicing costs every year; c) the government should move out of grain trading, in which another Rs500 billion are locked up.
Finally, the most important prerequisite for prosperity is to control violence and reestablish order in the country. All aspects of state power must be brought to bear for this objective: military, political and ideological. Now is the time to chart a new course so that Pakistan can survive and prosper.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 6th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (31)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@sterry: Sir all I can say is you really don't even know who your dad is and neither does your mom. You may draw your conclusions form there on. I would not mind if you drew Pakistan's blood line to 60 million years so your bloodline joins the end of the cretaceous. In fact Pakistani bloodline was actually discovered along the K2 boundary.
@Sridhar Kaushik "What a joke! And i thought Pakistan came into existence only in 1947. With this kind of indoctrination going on in Pakistan, no wonder Pakistan has a bleak future. They don’t even know their proper history."
What is Pakistan's history then? Did Pakistanis magically appear in 1947? The majority of the countries population did not immigrate from India and hence have links to the ancient civilizations of the area. Those civilizations are Indian and no one is denying that- except all the Indians in the comment section.
@sterry:
Pakistani history dating back to 7000 years? Are you referring to Arabia and North Africa from where your ancestors came from as taught in your history/pakistan studies texts?
@Zalmai He never said Pakistanis are not of Indian origin. Instead he's pointing to the great deal of diversity in South Asia that is both present in India and Pakistan. Many Pakistani ethnic groups overlap with Indian ones (ex. Punjabi people) while others don't (ex. Afghans). Similarly, India has a large Dravidian population which Pakistan does not have. This in turn has led to a similar but different makeup of the population. Why does the diversity of South Asia cause you so much discomfort?
@author,
"The question of how to place Pakistan on the path of prosperity can be addressed by rethinking prosperity in terms of providing opportunities to all of the people rather than only a few, to develop their capabilities"
With due respect, those are rather empty words without first addressing the real fundamental problem. Don't you think that Pakistan needs to change its security state paradigm and expansionist geopolitical goals first before it can turn its attention to social and economic justice?
Pakistan's foremost national priorities still remain to "eat grass to get Islamic nuclear bombs and inflict 1000 cuts on India in a 1000 year war"? Then there is the expansionist goal of annexing Kashmir and Afghanistan. Unless and until this thinking and priority changes, how can you adopt a social welfare priority?
What I am saying is that you are proposing the "cart" without the "horse".
I think that the author has touched upon a real truth- the future of Pakistan hinges on the inherent abilities of the Pakistani people to achieve what few Muslim nations have managed to do - namely build a functioning democracy with a vibrant civil society. Despite external pressures, Pakistan continues to forge ahead with innovation and development; be it in military self sufficiency with jet fighters, missiles and tanks, industry such as textiles and sports goods or fashion. The fact that so many Indians are here to decry and belittle Pakistan only shows that they remain threatened by Pakistan and is reason itself to believe that the author's words carry truth. To paraphrase the Quaid of critics, " Let them do their worst, we should do our best" Take a look at the Pakistani diaspora in North America who are highly educated and contribute to society in many ways. The people in Pakistan can definitely do the same.
Genetic diversity among population where marriage among first cousins is a norm?
" ... the people of this country have not only considerable cerebral capabilities but also have a cultural diversity ... " I thought it was to preserve cultural unity that Pakistan was created. Now, lets take another look at that cerebral part ........
@sterry: "...Perhaps a little history lesson is in order for you then. You forget that the civilizations of Pakistan are well over 7000 years old..." From 1947 to 2013 is an interval of ...... ? 7000 Years? Civilizations of Pakistan? Your history lesson is very little, in every which way. Keep us entertained!
@ Sterry
Your feeble attempt at distinguishing yourself from all things Indian is your version of his story not history. I never met a Pakistani who did not look like an Indian. You can spin it any which way you can but your appearance betrays your attachment to India
@ Gardezi
Your handle speaks volumes, you are connecting yourself to Gardez, Paktia in Afghanistan. You should try Lahori or some other name from Punjab.
(You forget that the civilizations of Pakistan are well over 7 000 years old and predate Hinduism) Ha, ha, ha. What a joke! And i thought Pakistan came into existence only in 1947. With this kind of indoctrination going on in Pakistan, no wonder Pakistan has a bleak future. They don't even know their proper history.
Exactly the spirit needed to advance. No country ever became strong by not believing in itself. One wonders at the mentality of Pakistanis who don't believe in Pakistan, instead of making an effort to improve things.
Everyone of us talks of problems the Country is faced with. What is the solution? Dignity of work (labor). More stress on quality, in basic education, that is where the foundation is laid. Our universities are churning out post graduates. Most are out of jobs or overqualified for the jobs they are engaged in. Moreover the standard of education has gone down. Educatiional institutes are operating in houses, where classes are conducted in refurbished kitchens and wash rooms, with no space for games and other activities. In the institutions where there are play grounds and auditoriums, there are no activities.
Pakistan is developing country, accordingly our socio-economic policies should be based on that basis. 60 t0 70% of the population lives are work in the rural areas. More people should be engaged in agriculture, with latest technology. More educational institutions should be opened to teach agriculture. Presently the situation is that the cultivated land is being sold to real estate developers. Real estate is a dead and unproductive investment. People are moving to cities for jobs. The cities are getting choaked for lack of facilities. USA is an industrialised Country, their involment in agriculture is arount 5%. Saudi Arabia economy is on oil, yet they are cultivating wheat and exporting Our economic policies should be more towards agriculture development, just as other fields
Pakistan should learn from the history of renaissance and how Europe came out of dark ages by keeping religion a strictly private affair. Partition based on religion has harmed Pakistan economically. Just imagine how much difference the combined resources of Pakistan and India and money spent by them on defense would have made. Once Pakistan realise its folly and bottle the genie of religion, it will have a fair chance to prosper. Otherwise it is doomed.
If you see the world history, you will know any country to make any progress, they have to first get rid of religious mindset. Europe could come out of dark ages only after there was Renaissance and Pope was cut to his size. When you get rid of religion based superstitions and follow the path of rationality and scientific temper then only you make progress. The only solution for Pakistan problem of poverty is to keep religion a strictly private affair. Partition based on religion was the biggest blunder of Pakistan. Just imagine the strength of combined resources and productive use of money spent on Defense by Pakistan and India and how much difference it would have made only if people had treated religion as a private matter.
I disagree with the writer saying that Pakistan has “predominantly young population that has great potential talent”. Yes it is true, but we have un-educated ‘Young’ population and on a national scale, we have no ‘talent’. The educated class cannot be considered as ‘talent’ as they all are looking for ‘shortcuts’, even the ones who have attended world's leading educational institutues. What we need is ‘strong governance’ at all levels, high tolerance and real hard working people. And combination all these with an honest and steady leadership can set a future course, perhaps in ten years time to grow. Unless we change our selves, we can never make strides of a successful nation.
@author, I think pakistan had all the above natural resources since 1947 right, still in 2013 it is what it is now. may be 65yrs is not enough to develop i think
@Zalmai:
It used to be Indian culture. What is now cannot be called Indian culture. Pakistan did not become overnight on Aug 14 1947, but was a gradual process over many decades and the results for all to see.
@polpot: And of course change the brake fluid gear oil coolant and the engine oil. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
@piddler With work force of about 70 million , you want all of them to truck drivers and traders. It is all so easy.:
SIr, I liked your article and it gave me some new information about Pakistan, I wish Pakistan to prosper as a nation that is progressive and tolerant with good relationship with its neighbors. I think Pakistan has to first shed its colonial baggage and move forward with what is present now. Pakistani leaders should not feed their general public with myopic views of the world. Pakistan has to tackle fundamentalism and go back to its founding father's vision of a progressive nation that is tolerant, was it not the feeling of not belonging lead Mr.Jinnah to demand a separate nation for Muslim from India..
@Zalmai: What Afghan culture? It's not even Afghanistan has Afghan culture. It's Pashtoon, Tajik, Uzbek, Hazarra etc., etc.
If Pakistan was a car ...... ++++++++++++++++++ it xould be made new by changing its engine transmission wheels shock absorbers vrakes gear train headlights carburettor......the list goes on. After a coat of paint it would prosper by running on water.
@sterry: "You forget that the civilizations of Pakistan are well over 7 000 years old and predate Hinduism – ..." You mean 5000 years perhaps ! I mean recorded history doesn't go beyond 5000 years does it?. Rest agreed 100%. Regards.
While looking at Pakistan's people and resources, one wonders why Pakistan can not prosper? but when you look at its blundering and brooding leaders, you get the answer.
@Zalmai: Perhaps a little history lesson is in order for you then. You forget that the civilizations of Pakistan are well over 7 000 years old and predate Hinduism - both in present Afghanistan when Hindu Rajas ruled at Kabul and present India after the British. The land of Pakistan was part of Persian Khorasan as well as a satrapy in Alexander of Macedon's Greek Empire. Greek civilization and culture fused with local culture and existed for several centuries in the lands of Pakistan. The Arabs may have invaded Sind and brought Islam to South Asia in the 7 th century but they also brought soldiers and slaves who settled in parts of Sind and the Makran Coast of Baluchistan. The great movement of people in from Central Asia came with Turkic races of the that region who fused with local civilization to create the Mughal Empire. India has a great deal of diversity too and you should know that even in Afghanistan there is great diversity from oriental looking Hazaras and Turkmens to darker skinned Kandaharis. So there is no one Indian race nor one Afghan race any more than there is one Pakistani race. The fact that the history of diversity of Pakistan causes you so much discomfiture points to some deeper problem.
What genetic diversity are you talking about? Pakistan is made up of Indians and Afghans, the rest is fictional and delusional. Two cultures exist in Pakistan and they are Indian and Afghan.
You sir, are the King of wishful thinking.
Pakistan will prosper when the NATO supply routes are reopened