The affected route, which runs from Torkham Gate at the Afghanistan-Pakistan border to Karachi, has been crucial for the United States as it winds down its combat mission in landlocked Afghanistan and moves equipment out of the country.
The route accounts for the vast majority of ground traffic of US military cargo through Pakistan and has been targeted by protesters in Pakistan angered by US drone strikes.
"We are aware protests have affected one of the primary commercial transit routes between Pakistan and Afghanistan," Pentagon spokesperson Mark Wright told Reuters.
"We have voluntarily halted US shipments of retrograde cargo ... to ensure the safety of the drivers contracted to move our equipment," he added, referring to shipments going out of Afghanistan.
The US decision to temporary suspend its use of the route is another headache for military planners just as Afghan President Hamid Karzai throws into doubt American plans to keep some forces in Afghanistan after Nato's combat mission ends next year.
Karzai has so far refused to sign a bilateral security pact the United States and Nato say are crucial for some international forces to stay to advise and assist Afghans.
Wright said the US military expected it could resume its retrograde shipments through the Pakistani route in the near future. He also pointed out that the United States has other options to move equipment out of the country.
Still, other options are far more costly, including the shipments via the so-called Northern Distribution Network, a complex web of transit routes through Russia and Central Asia. That route is key in bringing supplies into Afghanistan.
The United States also flies equipment out of Afghanistan in jets, including munitions and weapons.
The US military had to rely on those alternatives, however, when Pakistan closed down the routes to protest a Nato cross-border killing of Pakistani soldiers in 2011.
Although there is another ground supply route through Pakistan, closure of the main route essentially shuts off retrograde shipments, one US official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The United States still has about 46,000 troops in Afghanistan, a figure set to fall to 34,000 by early next year.
As Nato winds down its operations, it is handing responsibility for fighting Taliban insurgents to the Afghans, before most foreign combat forces pull out by the end of 2014.
Nato plans to leave a training mission, expected to number 8,000 to 12,000 soldiers, in Afghanistan after 2014.
US and Nato officials have warned that if Karzai does not sign the security deal with the United States promptly, both Washington and the alliance would have to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014.
Nato officials have also warned that, if all foreign troops left, it could put at risk billions of dollars in foreign aid because donors would be reluctant to contribute to funding Afghan security forces if there were no foreign troops on the ground to see how the money was spent.
COMMENTS (16)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
We urge everyone to keep in mind that we are fighting a common war and share a common stance against terrorism. Our common enemies would love to see us part ways for the sake of gaining advantage. We have a shared responsibility of restoring peace in the region. Therefore, it only makes sense for us to remain unified in regards to our peace objectives in the region. Our leaders continue to meet to address our shared concerns, and we hope to overcome any issues or concerns that are preventing us from working in a healthy partnership.
Ali Khan
Seems like many in Pakistan haven't figured out that for years 3/4 of NATO supplies (including all weapons/ammo etc) have been using alternative route - it's why your last embargo/extortion didn't work. If the USA can bring in supplies using an alternative route they surely can use that same route to remove things. USA decision may cost more but they don't want to place Pakistani drivers in harms way - something that neither Khan or Sharif seem to care about.
@Asif: There is no question of leniency! Mr Obama blinked at the right moment to support the new moderate Iranian government and to be allowed to keep his Nobel Prize award! Besides it is IRAN which is offering concessions!
Rex Minor
First Blow to giant USA-given by a small group of people-an emerging political force in Pakistan under the charismatic Leadership of IK who is condescendingly called as 'Naive and Novice in Politics'. Come on MR. PM wake up! it is time for SOLIDARITY. I am a proud PTI supporter and I want PEACE in Pakistan.
@Mohammad: One cannot have the cake and eat it too. Either you want dignity with sovereignty or slavery with cash compensation? Make up your mind what is more important, to survive with dishonour or risk the survival with dignity. I would choose the latter, dignity since the survival is controlled by te creator and no mortal. Cheers..
Rex Minor
@Bakhtiyar Ghazi Khan: USA/NATO has two land routes through Pakistan. They are still using the one through Baluchistan which is still open. Stop chest thumping.
@IZ: because people keep creating stori.. This is a success story of Pti and kpk people, but these days this news will never make it to the headlines in tribune....,
@Asif: Another conspiracy theory? There is a rumor going around you hear voices,and talk to yourself.
NATO supplies continue but US withdrawl from Afghanistan is now stopped. This is the opposite result of what Pakistani establishment has wanted since 2001.
OK.. that brings awful and miserable life to so many people involved in this business..!
I pointed out weeks ago when PTI began all this blocking routes drama that most traffic through Pakistan consisted of NATO withdrawing from Afghanistan and that by blocking supply routes they were effectively trying to keep NATO in Afghanistan for longer. Looks like that is precisely what they have accomplished. My question then and my question now to Imran Khan and PTI is why do you want NATO to stay in Afghanistan?
A Slap and a drone.
Imran Khan brings the US to its knees. Amazing. The situation does not seem conducive for US presence in the region any longer. I'm sure the actions of Pakistanis and Afghans will force a complete withdrawal from the region. Great news. Good work.
Ever wondered why all of a sudden US has been lenient with Iran and made a deal with them? An alternate southern land route.
Guess, US was wanting to stay in afghanistan longer.IK/PTI gladly obliged them by stopping their exit.Who knows who have secret deals with US?
Karzai warned of US leaving the Afghanistan? How can you threaten a person about being left alone in his own home?