'Penniless' man is worth $65 million, court rules - and must give wife half

High Court judge brands well-connected millionaire a liar and his ex-wife a conspiracy theorist.

Reuters November 24, 2013
Michelle Young arrives at The Royal Courts of Justice in London April 13, 2011. PHOTO: REUTERS

LONDON: One of Britain's longest and most bitter divorce battles culminated on Friday with a High Court judge branding a well-connected millionaire a liar and his ex-wife a conspiracy theorist.

Far from being "penniless and hopelessly bankrupt", as he had claimed, Scot Young, 51, was worth $65 million and his estranged wife Michelle Young, 49, should get half of it, judge Philip Moor ruled.

"This case has been quite extraordinary even by the standards of the most bitter of matrimonial breakdowns," Moor wrote in his ruling, noting that it had taken over six years and 65 court hearings to come to trial.

The case has made headlines in Britain because of the size of the claims and the fact that Scot Young has enjoyed financial help from high-profile friends including Philip Green, the billionaire owner of the Topshop retail chain.

Michelle Young has run up legal bills of 6.5 million pounds, while Scot Young has served six months in jail for failing to provide full and frank disclosure of his assets.

The pair were married for 17 years until 2006 and enjoyed a lavish lifestyle of mansions, jet-setting holidays and gifts of diamond jewelry funded by Scot Young's investments in property, technology and start-up companies.

It all fell apart when the marriage breakdown coincided with what the husband described as a total meltdown of his business empire that left him "penniless and hopelessly bankrupt" with unpaid debts of 28 million pounds.

The judge said it was impossible to know the full truth of his financial position due to "the significant number of lies told by the husband to so many people over such a long period".

He ordered Young to pay his ex-wife a lump sum of 20 million pounds within 28 days.

Michelle Young maintains that the meltdown was a fiction specifically designed to hide her ex-husband's wealth and deprive her and the couple's two daughters of their rightful share - a version of events also rejected by the judge.

"She sees conspiracy everywhere," he wrote.

A furious Michelle Young branded the ruling "disgraceful".

"I stand by what I said. He's worth billions," she told reporters outside the court, according to reports in several British national media. She also issued a written statement in which she called her ex-husband a "maniac".


Crazy | 8 years ago | Reply

@abd: That the wife gave up her career to look after their kids,, that in the interests of fairness there was an equal contribution to marriage so division of assets has to be equal. But this is really abused in england. Women (and men) end up making false allegations in order to win money, it is an adversarial system so knowingly or inadvertently promotes conflict for the sake of money....ultimately kids suffer...as their parents instead of looking after them when they are most vulnerable, are attacking each other. That is why england is now known as divorce capital of he world...Huge legal fees, high payouts to women...in practice no consequences for awful behaviour

abd | 8 years ago | Reply

What is the justification for requiring the husband to give half his wealth to his divorced wife?

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read