Anti-Americanism is typically considered to stem from two different sources: what America is (its culture, and its internal political and economic structure), and what America does (its foreign policy). This distinction is somewhat artificial in a context in which America is primarily defined internationally by its foreign policy.
A third source of anti-Americanism stems not from US actions or traits, but a strategic operationalisation of anti-American sentiment for political gain in the home country. It brokers internal unity in fractious environments. So we see the Pakistani government publicly condemning drone strikes even as it privately approves (at least some of) them. One of the reasons that the US probably cannot be more open about drone strikes is, ironically, to appease Pakistan’s government, which in turn, condemns drones to drum up anti-Americanism. Talk about a vicious (and confounding) cycle. Adapting a classification system developed by prominent political scientists Peter Katzenstein and Robert Keohane, we can think of four different types of anti-Americanism in Pakistan: radical, socio-religious, sovereign-nationalist and liberal. These categories are broadly decreasing in order of intensity from radical to liberal and increasing in order of malleability of attitudes.
The radical category does not need much elaboration: think of the likes of al Qaeda and its sympathisers. These people want destruction of the US because of what America is, what America does, and to gain global power.
The socio-religious category dislikes America, a powerful non-Muslim country that is also seen as doing harm to the Muslim world. This anti-Americanism has an important ‘us versus them’ dimension: the American superpower pitted against the Muslim world, with Pakistan’s identification and sympathy firmly ingrained on the side of other Muslim countries. This explains the reluctance to blame the terrorists who emerge from ‘us’, while at the same time, jumping to condemn the ‘other’s’ drones; it explains martyred canines and unmartyred soldiers. It also explains the identification with Muslim causes in other contexts (such as the Palestinian cause), while ignoring the atrocities against Christians, Shias, and Ahmadis in our own country. This category is perhaps, represented best by the Jamaat-e-Islami and other religious political parties, and by individuals subscribing to their views.
The sovereign-nationalist category focuses on American policies seen as causing harm towards Pakistan itself. Perhaps, the political party that fits in most neatly into this category is the PTI, with its stance against drone strikes. This category of anti-American sentiment focuses perhaps most clearly on what America does (and not necessarily what it is); Imran Khan argued exactly this in an interview with Express News on November 11, saying: “I am not anti-US … I am against their policies.”
The fourth and final category of anti-Americanism is the liberal type, which focuses on America’s perceived hypocrisy in saying one thing and doing another, and on failing to live up to its own liberal and progressive goals and ideals. Examples are its failure to close down Guantanamo Bay and historically propping up dictators in contexts where it suits its own interests to do so. Most Pakistanis are negatively predisposed to the US, with the predisposition ranging from mistrust to bias against the US and its actions. And these attitudes also have deep historical bases, which make them more difficult to change. With the above four types or categories of anti-Americanism spanning essentially all our social and economic classes, it is little wonder that anti-Americanism is used as a constant political tool for manipulation in Pakistan, especially by our civilian government and political parties and the media. It takes various forms, but unites a divided country.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 14th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (30)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
"Great read. And its great that she’s so smart and pretty. Totally package. I’m off to Maryland"
Pretty?? I don't think that's a fault you can accuse her of - she's as homely as they come.
"Great read. And its great that she’s so smart and pretty. Totally package. I’m off to Maryland."
Pretty??
Compared to what - camels and goats?
I guesss the neo-liberal Miss Afzal means anti.Washington rather than anti-Americanism for which she will have to look over her shoulders in the neighbouring Mexico and cuba and the rest of South American countries. Gringos is the term used for the people most of whom are not able to walk straight with a chewing gum in mouth and a can of coke in hand.. The washington team is presently engaged in a crusade against the majority of muslim Nations and consider those who oppose and resist as terrorists. Their Embassieys are being used for surveillance in the host country
Rex Minor
Great read. And its great that she's so smart and pretty. Totally package. I'm off to Maryland.
@x: you really have no idea how many they publish and how many they block... a lot of mine are blocked even though they have no bad language or anything... would love to know their selection criteria on this. @unbelievable: the list goes on and on? enlighten us... please tell us how much further it goes. list all the times Americans have selflessly jumped into a war? while you're at it... compare with all the times it has started or jumped into a war to profit of the outcome. And muslims in the US have higher income than average americans... where are you getting these stats? and are you controlling for education (e.g. all the doctors and engineers flooding in from Pakistan...obviously they would have higher incomes)... and other factors... or did you just find a stat and run with it? And the US does back Israel... you're joking, right?
@Anjaan:
While adding fuel to the fire it certainly didn't start with America's India policy. I might add that when USA was policy neutral to both India and Pakistan you both hated the American's as they opposed your acquisition of nuclear weapons - a policy which in hindsight was spot on as they are expensive and never going to be used.
@unbelievable: Read my comment.
@dr jitendra bargaje: Don't invent your own definition for our religion. Our Ummah is simply the worldwide community of Muslims. Its rather simple, this idea is not against anyone, but achieving global Muslim solidarity and unification.
@Anon: No et rarely blocks comments. Comment shows your anti-Pak, anti Muslim stance though.
@Truth-and nothing but:
Muslim myth which conveniently ignores readily available facts. UN Security council (supported by USA) has condemned Israel on a regular basis including the Settlements, claiming Jerusalem as capital, bombing Lebanon, Sharon's visit to Temple Mount, violence against Palestinians etc - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ListoftheUNresolutionsconcerningIsraelandPalestine#UnitedNationsSecurityCouncilresolutions . Anti USA blather is popular in Pakistan - seldom based on facts and often going to great lengths to ignore facts. The USA is suppose to be anti Muslim but it gives Muslims in America the same rights at is other citizens and Muslims in America tend have a better income/life style that average American's. America was the country that risked it's sons and daughters to save Muslims from ethnic cleansing by the Serbs - no oil involved, no trade involved, just saving Muslims from slaughter when no one else would step up to the plate (including Pakistan BTW). Did the Ummah acknowledge - nope. List goes on and on.
@Parvez: Yes you have managed to perfectly convey that though seem to have read history... how little of it you actually understand! American govts... like all empires, do not go around interfering the in the rest of the world to "make it a better place". They do so to enhance their power and influence. Ask the south americans... they have been bearing the brunt of American generosity for a while now and have only recently started to overcome it. According to the Ecuadorian President theres a joke in South America..."The US is the only country in the Americas where a coup doesnt take place.... because there's no US embassy!" Also look at the example of Guatemala, where the CIA now admits they falsely presented the threat of a communist takeover so as to aid a coup against a populist govt that was harmful to US business interests there. If the US is so concerned about spreading democracy in the world, ever wonder why they push for it in the Gulf states or Saudi Arabia? Why are these countries exempt from the bounties of US generosity even though they have such good relations? Further influence/intereference will be seen from the fact that the ET will block the posting of this comment!
We are equal opportunity prostitutes. We will sell ourselves to the Americans, Saudis or Chinese. Who ever is the highest bidder.
Some issues I think America has and not only with Pakistan : - America is extremely generous and gives a lot........problem is that it just does not know HOW to give. - America has financially supported the government of Pakistan over the years........while the people were left out in the cold. Yes this is the fault of the GOP but the money eventually comes out of the peoples pockets, resulting in falling standards of living. This was known to the Americans long ago and yet they persist, so anti-Americanism was obvious. - On American foreign policy the people feel that democracy, liberty, equality etc are traits designed for America.......lesser countries are subjected to what America considers is good for them. Let me quote Henry Kissinger on the regime change in Chile some 40 years ago :
' I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much more important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves ' - unquote.....and not much has changed since.
I feel that history has much to do with this subject, because America itself was a colony with British and European interests involved. What it possibly has to realise is that to ' do empire ' requires much, much more than just sheer military might.
I hope I have managed to convey my thoughts in an objective manner.
@@unbelievable - "Erm.. since when has Russia and China invaded and bombed out other countries? Which other western country uses drones? "
That's because a. the Saudis or any Muslim country did not invite China or Russia to counter Iran, but called on America to do something? b. The Pakistanis sucked up secretly with U.S. and not Russia and China to drone the bad Taliban c. The Saudis and Bahrainis invited U.S. and not Russia or China to counter Saddam Hussain. d. The Egyptians reached out to U.S. but not Russia and China to crash the Muslim Brotherhood.
@MadihaAfzal Pakistanis like my self have love-hate relationship with America as a 12 year old after reading brief biography of Abraham Lincoln and later on articles on founding fathers established a love relationship it gained strength in 1980 when I spent 3 months in USA for my first bypass surgery it was a melting pot and I believed it was future of mankind ,brother hood sans colou religion ,ethnicity but the double standards especially with Muslim countries and Palestine breed amtiamericanism ,I visit Maryland almost every year.
Most of the pakistanis are obsessed with ummah rather than true nationalism. Ummah
itself is transnational ideology like communism which at times can become antinational if it's goasl are not met. The concept of ummah outrightly rejects not only christians or hindus but also shias, ahmadias, sunni liberals and even sufi philanthropist. Funadamentals of pakistan as a nation were weakened by zia ul haque and it is now difficult to repair. Once america withdraws it's military from afgan, pakistan will be a nation of chaos with drug traffickers, jihadis, baloch nationals, muhagirs, talibans, mafias, hajzars, kashiri separtist all will try to promote therir religios and finacial interest. Conflict of these inerests will lead to a state of anarchy.
We will Export dairy milk to good and bad American. Lets do it for money. America sells arms why not we sell our good dairy milk to them. Milk is Bigger business than selling arms. America like milk the equation will be equal, we will begin to like too. Everybody, milk export to America. Lets make milk export to America a National Goal, Call it a Simple Strategic Milk Policy.
Pakistan is not Anti-American. You can say that main stream political parties are Anti American but the majority of Pakistani population isn't against America and it becomes clear when analyzed deeply. Otherwise, why would there be so many lines outside the American embassy to get the US visa ? ;)
A case of Pakistan vs Pakistanis. Pakistan itself has a long history of ties with the US, since the times of US vs USSR. There has been both good and bad.
As for anti-American sentiments, I'm sure even Germans have those now too. Probably very few places in the world that don't harbor anti-American sentiment. The key is how people act on that sentiment.
@@unbelievable: Hmmm, could those be the drones that Pakistan wanted to buy and use against the "Bad Taliban"????
Erm.. since when has Russia and China invaded and bombed out other countries? Which other western country uses drones? Which country vetoes resolutions against Israel?
Anjaans comment takes the cake . I would call it comment of the day .
The intensity of preoccupation with the US is because there is glamor in that target? Just a thought. And for variety, there is always India ...... again, just speculating. One thing is evident: Pakistan is not considered worth a thought.
@unbelievable: USA's commitment to Israel is total and this is what prevents Security Council from passing any resolution that is even mildly critical of Israel. This is also the fear of US veto which forced the Palestinians to seek a reduced status at the UN instead of full membership, and even for whatever Palestinians got, the US demonstrated its annoyance by withholding its contributions to UNESCO, which has forced the UN to cancel US's voting rights at the UNESCO, along with Israel, which has also stopped its contribution.
This is the threat of US veto which prevents Russia and China, even other countries, from doing whatever they waned to do for the Palestinians and to giving them a state which is their legitimate right.
Unity built through hating others and spewing venom on others, can never have a positive effect in any country that practices it. Today, Pakistan is sinking through its own duplicity and contradictions, it does not need enemies but more friends. To call those extending a hand and leg up enemies is a recipe for isolationism. The need of the hour is for the Government to look the people frankly in the eye and tell them where the country really stands and the need for sacrifices to put it back on the rails. Continuing past policies can only accelerate the process of disintegration.
“I am not anti-US … I am against their policies.” . One of my favorite lines - of course when you look closely at their policies they are pretty much the same as all Western Countries and when it comes to Israel most Muslims tend to ignore that the USA policy isn't any different than the UN Security Council which includes both Russia and China.
Such categorization seems like a useless academic exercise, akin to the nuttery of labelling the Taliban as a 'Pashtun nationalist movement created specifically against colonial imperialism!', while ignoring all the global religo-political current.
While there are differences in intensity and radicalism, they are all inter-twined and the lines are blurred, where one can amp up the derangement and move up the ladder.
Al Qaeda operatives have been found amongst the JI activists. JI has a strong alliance with PTI. It is just their level of intensity and rationalizing of how they oppose the US, and add a dimension of how much they may sympathize with dubious extremist groups opposed to the US as well. They all generally have shared religo-political Wahhabi/Salafi/Deoband/Sunni Islamist leanings as well, though greatly diverge on some issues, such as seen on Syria. Minority Pakistanis with heavy nationalist, religious, liberal or likewise conservative leanings sometimes do share the same anti-US sentiments, though will more likely differ from things such as drones.
Guess what ... anti-Americanism amongst Pakistani population started with the change in US-India relations...there would be no anti-American feeling amongst the Pakistani population, if there was no US-India nuclear deal and subsequent normalization of relations between the two nations ...
The truth is somewhere in the middle. US has been a source of a lot of good(medicine,science and technology)but it's record in trying to control other countries is open before everyone.