Let us be clear on what Syed Munawwar Hassan wants. He wants our soldiers to lose their grit in the face of a lethal enemy; he wants the funerals of our martyrs to be deserted; he wants confusion and surrender. However, above all and make no mistake about this, he wants us to lose. His remarks are possibly treasonous and certainly treacherous and malicious. For starters, he deserves no deference or a mainstream public voice, at least till he apologises. For once, the ISPR statement has gotten it exactly right. However, it would have been nicer if the reaction came from the Federal Government and other political forces.
Our soldiers fighting for our existence do not need any lofty endorsements or certificates by the JI. There is the issue of the integrity and meaning of the word ‘martyr’/‘shaheed’. While precise definition of such terms is hard, yet, the core is easily and intuitively knowable. Martyr is a term of honour and of willingness to fight for a worthy cause.
Messers Maulana and Munawwar Hassan are deliberately cheapening the term martyr. It has already come to the point where it means very little in Pakistan, and now the attempt is to completely hollow it, so that it can be used indiscriminately. It now only reflects and highlights the leaning of the person using it and not for whom it is being employed. A state of affairs where martyrdom has no meaningful significance is designed to go in favour of Mr Mehsud and his biggest fan, Syed Munawwar Hassan. It is a state of affairs without any higher principles, or any at all. The cliche “one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist” is silly and overrated at best, and in any event, not applicable here. Wanton criminality is no cause, much less a defensible one. The world has seen enough mass murderers and serial killers to understand that not all homicidal fanatics can be subjected to some pseudo subjective criteria.
On the flip side, a persuasive critique of imperialism and the discourse on war on terror is how the terms ‘terrorism’ and ‘terrorist’ were first emptied of a meaningful definition and then redefined to mean something ‘evil’ which needs to be ‘contained’ and ‘dealt with’, etc. Terrorism is now a concept with a religion and most times, ethnicity. This is a critique that Syed Munawwar Hassan and those of his ilk are incapable and ill-suited to make.
There is also a historical context to it. The shameful attempt and the debate to make commonplace the title of valour and honour is being conducted as we approach the tenth of Muharram, an occasion which defines and is defined by the concept of martyr and martyrdom. Our soldiers fighting the fanatic murderers are flag bearer of this elevated tradition. And Maulana and Syed Munawwar Hassan’s consistent dangerous spin doctoring of Muslims killing Muslims etc. continues. Let me end with “Ajab khel hua Islam ki taqdeer ke sath; Qatl-e-Shabbir hua nara-e-takbeer ke sath”.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 13th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (23)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
we are a confused State and MH / JI statement has made it more......
@unbelievable Totally agree. You said it. ET did not publish my earlier comment written in a lighter vein. The term 'Shaheed' has roots in religion and hence it is used more frequently in Muslim countries than others but in Pakistan there is no established criteria for bestowing this title.
A great narrative from the author, which has more or less splashed in the media. But the one question he has not brought out from his analysis. Who are the leaders of the clergy who approved calling soldiers as martyrs fighting Indian soldiers and then continued the title of martyrs even when they went on the spree killing Bengalis, Pashtuns and the Baluchs, all muslim believers with their beards and civilian clothing saying their prayers reciting the name of Allah five times a day. where is this clergy now; let them come forward and call their names to be recognised! They have defamed the religion of Islam.
Rex Minor
I go through JI Chief statement, if chief did mistake of insulting Shaheed then ISPR should not release press statement as they did first I would like to say Chief is totally right because who is the follower of America Policy and its agenda then how it could be say they are Shaheed and second if Chief did mistake to take wrong words against soldiers then ISPR have shown his real face they are interested in Politics not for peace if they are then tell me how it can be possible Killing of Usama Bin Ladin??????
A. Let us be clear on what Syed Munawwar Hassan wants. He wants our soldiers to lose their grit in the face of a lethal enemy; he wants the funerals of our martyrs to be deserted; he wants confusion and surrender.
B. Martyr is a term of honour and of willingness to fight for a worthy cause.
Sir, the time for skirting the issue is over. Munawwar Hassan has drawn a line in the sand. The Mujahid of Allah on one side and the rest on the other. And make no mistakes he is not alone. Just consider the fate of Musharaff in the Lal Masjid episode.Was Musharraf a soldier or not? And did he face a 'lethal enemy'? And who is standing by him?
Coming to the 'funerals of our martyrs',who 'fight for a worthy cause'. Is Taseer a 'Shaheed', who 'fought for a worthy cause' and also faced the same 'lethal enemy'? Was his funeral not 'deserted'?
In my opinion, as long as you still couch the debate about the nature of Pakistani State, its Purpose and its relationship with its Citizens in terms defined by religion, 'confusion' and 'surrender' will continue to stare you in the face.
Revisit the motto of Pakistan Army. Make it an Army of ALL citizens, whether they believe in Jihad and Shahadat or not, the 'confusion' will resolve itself.
Dear Brother and Sister Forget JI, JUI, MH and MFR Pakistan Army is committed to fight terrorism Today and forever Such statements cant lower our spirits This life is for Pakistan without any ifs and buts
@Mu: Can you pl explain it's meaning? Venkat
Excellent and I fully agree with your views. My take on this is that Munawar Hasan and Fazal-u-Rehman's utterances are absolutely politically motivated and highly mischievous. They possibly feel and may be they are correct, that with an inept government and an establishment that is seen as straddling the fence, their anti-state agenda ( I can not see it as anything else ) can be pushed along and the repercussion would be ' a bit of media noise ' at best because the state lacks the resolve to do what should be done.
“Ajab khel hua Islam ki taqdeer ke sath; Qatl-e-Shabbir hua nara-e-takbeer ke sath”. Says it all!
Saroop you have left me speechless after reading your article (for a change)
This confusion is because the ideology behind both are the same.
Thankfully this disgusting, rude and unpopular person has shown his true colours. Our army will get back its image and respect, which was lost due to its B Team.
You are giving way too much publicity to MH. Secondly you only ask for an apology from someone you respect. Thirdly, just deny the guy any forum, no interviews, no pictures, just totally ignore him and his followers. Banning, asking for apologies and or his head has proven to work counterproductive. Anyone making an alliance with MH or his party should get the same treatment. No forum no publicity!
Wrong and Useless debate.
@jilal: Sorry to sound like an Indian hater but I think most of these 20% would be trolling indians.
In the poll of this newspaper(in the last few days)-upward of 20% support JI's stance..now if this much support for a twisted argument is present among ET readers,what is happening in rest of the society?? How to even try to correct this hysteria/confusion/ignorance...need to absolutely censor all unhealthy arguments in madrassahs/mosques/party platforms/media-so that the 'so called learned' people don't get to teach to the impressionable nation.
It is amusing to see how Pakistanis are constantly getting caught up in semantics.
Who is a martyr? (Anyway the person is dead) Who is a true muslim? What contitutes blasphemy? Who is a terrorist or non state actor? Who is a criminal and who is a Ghazi? Are non uniform wearing soldiers, mujahid or regular army? Who ia a foreign agent or patriot? Good taliban or bad taliban? Jinnah's Pakistan or Zia's Pakistan?
These so called 'ulema' have shown,how much 'ilm' they have!!
I think instead of just lambasting Jamaat e Islami chief, one must first deal with his and his followers chief complaint: Pakistan is fighting the Taliban to please the US.
Please come up with facts and figures to counter this statement. Go back to the history of the Afghan conflict and then try to prove who is fighting who and for what.
This will help clear cobwebs in the minds of those people who are sitting on the fence.