According to one official privy to developments, Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan was insisting on reviewing cooperation with the US in the aftermath of the drone strike which killed Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan chief Hakimullah Mehsud.
At his news conference immediately after Mehsud’s killing, Nisar termed the move an ‘attack on peace’ and indicated that the country’s top civil and military leadership would meet soon to respond to the situation.
However, a meeting of the Cabinet Committee of the National Security Council was not convened as the prime minister adopted a more ‘pragmatic approach’ in view of the evolving situation, the official told The Express Tribune on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.
He said Premier Nawaz made it clear during the emergency cabinet meeting last week that while his government has taken a principled stance against the CIA-piloted drone campaign, this did not mean that Pakistan’s ‘entire relationship with the US should be held hostage by one incident’.
“That is why he (the prime minister) is careful in making any public statement on the issue,” the official added.
Premier Nawaz made his only noticeable statement on the issue during military exercises in Bahawalpur last week, cautioning the US that the ‘senseless use of force’ would not bring peace. Unlike the interior minister, however, he did not indicate whether his government was considering any drastic steps to review ties with the US.
A senior foreign ministry official endorsed the premier’s view saying it would be unwise if Pakistan sought to redefine cooperation with the US at this stage.
Opposition parties, particularly the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, have been pushing for radical measures, including blocking vital supply lines for US-led Nato forces in Afghanistan.
The government has no intention of accepting such demands, said the official.
The government’s cautious approach is attributed to the importance it attaches to its ties with the US.
One of Prime Minister Nawaz’s close aides said the government had invested heavily in its relationship with Washington and hence, did not believe in ‘rocking the boat.’
“We will continue to raise our concerns with the US over certain issues, including drones, but at the same time both sides will continue to cooperate in areas where there is convergence [between the two],” said the official requesting not to be identified.
Ties between Pakistan and the US have witnessed trouble since 2011 due to a variety of incidents, including secret raid on Osama Bin Laden’s hideout in Abbottabad and the deaths of 24 Pakistani soldiers in US airstrike at the Afghan border.
However, relations have shown improvement following the Premier Nawaz’s visit to Washington last month.
Under the revised strategic dialogue which will kick off in Washington this week, the two countries will hold crucial talks on energy cooperation.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 11th,2013.
COMMENTS (38)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Rex Minor: HAH! No confidence move cannot do any harm :P PMLN has the simple Majority in National assembly & after 18th amendment anyone who votes against the party's decision can be kicked out of assembly if the party head wants :v win-win situation.
Begger are not chooser
Barack Obama was shaking in his boots in suspense of what Sharif might decide! He must be a profoundly relieved President today.
Mr Sharif has decided his own fate! He is unlikely to last his term as previously. The vote of No Confidence awaits him at te next opportunity.
Rex Minor
Does one expect a different approach from those who do the thinking for Nawaz Sharif. The rationale is that its worked well for Zardari for so long, so why not for us ........ and oh ! the people never mattered for so long, so why bother now.
Good thinking Pakistan. One should not bite the hand that feeds:)
@Faltu: Yes I have visited Iran...many more times than you and let me tell you they are self reliant because they have a strong autocratic government...Pakistanis wont like to emulate Iran, for starters can you take the idea of religious police poking their nose in your personal matters???
Cant rock the boat with the murderer of the Peace Process:) +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Smiles.
@Ch. Allah Daad: The problem is that while in opposition, Mian Sahib used to have the same approach as PTI. See their election campaign, they were all over bashing US and PPP's policies towards them.
Pakistan must Tax its citizens to finance its growth needs which alone will help it stand on its feet. Begging for financial support to stay afloat is severely undermining the confidence of citizens and their will. Only when a country knows or learns how to live within a budget will it shape policies that burn no holes in its pocket. The choice is to receive Aid and be a Slave or reject it to be ones own master. A beggar cursing donors is not only unethical but also irresponsible.
Then why to blame Musharraf, when he saved the country in critical time.
IK is as emotional as a 9 year old kid... learn the lesson from Iran, even though they dont take US aid but still they could not afford to bear US sanctions.
So Talibans are right when they say we are the slaves of U.S government. We cannot even condemn them for violating our sovereignty, this is a new level of Slavery.
"Ties with the US: Islamabad unlikely to rock the boat" +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ And Washington unlikely to rock the drones!
US is world power. We should not stand against US hegemony. World power has own way to do the world politics. We should not create hurdles.
Yes..The elite need $$$ to survive. Their business and kids are overseas. They need WB to run the country because they do not pay taxes.Pakistan will continue to be vassal state of uncle sham. The people will now realize their mistakes.
Army chief in the driving seat as he was in policy making of foreign policy
Why would Pakistan derail its relations with the US if the latter has killed one of the biggest enemies of the former? Makes no sense whatsoever (although the media has been projecting it in a totally different light to support JI & PTI)
Then be it the deja vu; Mr shareef is destined for "no confience" motion and will not be alloed to complete his term. People in a emocracy want solutions from their leaders and not explanations for "no action".
Rex Minor
..of course..what else could he have done..??? taken on the US..????
Very wise decision by Mian Sahib. PPP government did not rock the boat, nor future (God forbidden) Army government will do it. There is no other player in horizon who would come close to make such drastic decision. PTI, JI and some fools in cabinet can make such demands because they know that they will remain B teams for ever.
Nothing wrong with taking a practical approach - but one wonders how practical it is to have an interior minister denouncing the USA while the PM is taking a totally different approach. In the end the PM comes off as a weak leader who can't even control his own subordinates.