Arab Shaikh’s camp attacked in Balochistan

The attackers torched the camp and took off with weapons and two land cruisers.


Shezad Baloch October 22, 2013
Qatar’s Petroleum Minister Shaikh Ali Bin Abdullah. PHOTO: APP

QUETTA: A group of armed men stormed a makeshift camp set up by Qatar’s Petroleum Minister Shaikh Ali Bin Abdullah and killed a member of the Balochistan Levies force, identified as Ayub Shah Dost, on Tuesday.

Shaikh Ali was on a hunting trip in the Zamuran area of Buleda, Kech district at the time of the attack.

Speaking to The Express Tribune, Deputy Commissioner Kech Abdul Hameed Abro confirmed that the “Arab Shaikh was not present inside the camp when incident took place”.

According to a constable of Balochistan Levies in Buleda, armed men took off with two Kalashnikovs, a private weapon and two land cruisers.

“They torched the camp and a private vehicle before fleeing,” he said.

Members of royal families seek a no objection certificate (NOC) from the government before coming to different parts of Balochistan for hunting trips. There are several camps set up by the royal families of Qatar, Saudi Arabia as well as Kech, Chagai, Naushki and Jhal Magsi areas.

The attackers have not been identified but the local administration launched a search in the area.

In February, 2012, a group of armed men had also robbed Ali Bin Abdullah in the same area.

Balochistan, the most deprived province of the country, is a flashpoint for a separatist insurgency and sectarian violence since 2004. The insurgency, however, became deadlier following the killing of Jamhoori Watan Party leader Nawab Akbar Bugti in a military operation in 2006.

COMMENTS (59)

Bakhtiyar Ghazi Khan | 11 years ago | Reply

Furthermore, since ancient times, Pakistan has been a land which has absorbed and mixed with various nations including the Parthians, Scythians, Macedonians, Persians, Mongols, Turks, and Arabs. Your claimed percentages are absolute nonsense. The Pakistani people are the descendants of the land, and no one has more claim to this land than us. As a cultured people and successors to a long Persian-Turkish Islamic heritage, our views on race are much more tolerant than Hindus. Turks, Persians, Arabs, Macedonians, had no problem in marrying with their coreligionists regardless of race. Pakistan has a unique and diverse culture which is its strength and resilience. This is what makes Pakistan one of the most racially tolerant and unified nations on Earth.

Bakhtiyar Ghazi Khan | 11 years ago | Reply

@Citizen Kane: Nonsense. Pakistani people are the descendants of the Indus River Valley civilization, whilst the vast majority of Indians, Bengalis, and Tamils hail from the Ganges River basins. The differences are pronounced as far as cultural traits like language, diet, social customs, and physical traits like skin color, hair color, skull/bone structure, etc. There is absolutely no commonality between the two. We look absolutely nothing alike.

You hold on to your propaganda that Pakistan is a part of India, but it is simply false. 1,400 years ago, even before Islam entered the subcontinent, Pakistan was referred to as Sindh by the Arabs, based on the cradle of our civilization the Septa Sindh valley (Harrapa, Mohenjo-daro, Taxila, etc). India was always referred to as Hind, Hindustan, or as you call it Bharat. Pakistan, along with Afghanistan, was only a part of the same territory as modern-day India during the Mughal empire under Islamic rule, and subsequent British occupation. No time prior to that were the lands of modern-day Pakistan and India ever regarded as one nation.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ