Aesthetically speaking, too, ignoring Urdu is nothing short of murder. This is the language that gave us some great poets such as Ghalib, Faiz, Jalib and Faraz. Of course, Ghalib was before the creation of Pakistan; he is buried in India, so you may ask why try owning his ghost. The answer won’t come to you unless you visit his grave in the Nizamuddin area of Delhi. The greatest poet of the Urdu language lies there ignored like a stranded refugee in a Bangladeshi Bihari camp. Victim of a partition that left no future for his beloved language in his own beloved land. The experience of visiting his tomb brought such a crippling feeling of helplessness that I have never come so close to a nervous breakdown seeing a grave, and trust me, I have seen quite a few graves. Such a great legacy lost in such petty identity issues. We cannot have his tomb, but we sure can do some justice to his legacy.
And that’s not all. Great fiction and non-fiction writers. Lost. Now when you go to book stalls, you do not find great books of Urdu literature but cheap translations of Western books and a few how-to-do guides. Of course, there is an Academy of Letters (Akadmy Adabiyat) in this country and a National Language Authority. And yes, a National Book Foundation too. But for all practical purposes, they are missing in action and have become a dumping ground for political appointees. Then, there is the Federal Urdu University and there is no crueller joke than that its graduates find a hard time adapting to a market so dominated by the English language.
When you abandon a language and its literature, it is natural that only reactionary elements will benefit from the resulting vacuum. If you try finding Urdu books on the internet in order to download them, you will come across mostly religious titles. In the local markets too, it is easier to find jihadi and sectarian literature rather than works of Manto, Mushtaq Yousufi or Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi.
This jilting of an entire tradition is beyond comprehension for there is a big market out there. Pakistan’s population is growing, our diaspora has strong roots and a desire to connect with its motherland. And in this country, where no English news channel has ever survived for long, how is it possible that there is no space for Urdu literature.
Hollywood movies dubbed in Hindi are shown on our television channels as Urdu versions. Try looking for Urdu subtitles for movies on the internet and you will fail to find any in the huge databases that even cater to the needs of tiny African countries. Try putting one Urdu book in any ebook reader; our fonts are not recognised and only scanned copies can be read with great difficulty. Urdu word processors are perhaps, the most difficult interfaces to type in and computers usually do not come with Urdu-friendly keyboards. For a country with a youth bulge, how difficult it is to translate and create new interfaces.
The failure of Urdu in India is understandable but after decades of state investment in the language, our ignoring it in Pakistan is downright criminal.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 19th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (59)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@ahmed41: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindi%E2%80%93Urdu_controversy
@ahmed41: The point is not how many people actually appear, but that the Indian institutions still allow the freedom to opt for Urdu if one wishes to. Its like being secular, you may be only person who's lawfully different from the million others and you still have the rights to practice and celebrate your differences.
@JSM: @Author Thanks a lot! If the tomb of Ghalib is so well kept, I wonder whether the improvements in its upkeep shown in these videos are recent developments due to recent upgradation or whether the author is trying to mislead his countrymen, something Indians are constantly complaining? Will the author care to explain?
@shayar,
"With all due respect.Urdu is/was born indian natural language. It was a departing gift of 47 including land,water,money,heritage,history,etc. Unfortunate is that as of today 2013 ,you have lost everything.you have lost land,money, history,heritage,water and language plus sanity."
We have lost "everything" including "sanity"? How should we regain them? By singing vande Mataram to the Bharat Mata?
amanmehra,
"We love our ancestors and you love the invaders that’s the difference."
Are you sure about this? If you love your ancestors, sati and caste system will be celebrated. Instead, you love the "invaders" so much that you want to change your ancestral's cultur, speak English and called yourself a democracy, all taught to you by your invaders.
Hindi films are the best for promoting Urdu as many of script writers and actors have Urdu background.Urdu came into existence as Hindustani and was used by the army in their barracks during the Mughal time.before that it was Farsi or local languages,no Urdu at all.
Author,
You were lamenting about the state of Ghalib's grave. Kindly see the following link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOdVC5rZ0Fo
@x I know urdu script. See I told a reference. Those words are not mine. I myself know zer zabar and paish. At the other hand, Indians scripts are much more rich. Can be pronounced exactly, and do have more consonants and vowels. It is sure that urdu script is inferior than arabic ( even if you dont compare Indic scripts) . And, as Urdu is mostly Hindi, one cant write all sounds in urdu. My other intentions were that Urdu is harder and no use for Muslim of India (and may be Pakistani too). If old text are written in Indic script, it can help muslims as well as other admirerrs of shayars. Sticking to subset of arabic script is not good for Urdu itself, and also teaching it in madarsa (it is also tought in govt schools) will give more burden to lower level muslims who already have lesser resources and learning resources. (people who have resources, goes to pvt schools, even govt schools are free and have free meals too !!!! ) thank you for pointing !
I am no linguist, but I think most of the verbs of Urdu are Hindi (or Sanskrit) like karana, dena, khana, sona etc.
Urdu had a great future in East Bengal in pre/post-partitioned days (before and immediately after the creation of Pakistan) -- most Bengali educated people understood and loved Urdu, and some Bengali dialects (like Dacca city, North Bengal) had clear Urdu influence. However Urdu was used as a language of conspiracy, exploitation and arrogance. The fate of Urdu and Pakistan were sealed in 21 February 1952. Now Urdu is a dead and hated language in Bangladesh.
1/3rd of South Asian muslim hated Urdu. 1/3rd migrated to Pakistan after 1947 and these refugee (generations) now looked down upon by ethnic people of Pakistan, In India, the situation is bleak (some causes are written in this article). Beside, the 'economic strength' of Urdu is zero.
I think, future of Urdu is not so rosy in South Asia. However in distant future 'Urdu' may survive as dialects of some other languages in western part of South Asia..
The information that the author has is out of date. Ghalib's tomb has been recently renovated, one can check this out online.
Please note that in India, Urdu is thought of as a language of poetry and romance, typically associated with the city of Lucknow. Also note that there are federally funded Urdu universities in India, and a large number of universities offer Urdu degrees. In my home city of Mumbai, Mumbai University offers night time Urdu classes. In fact, there are Urdu departments as far south as the University of Madras.
Whats really illustrative (and disturbing) here is the comment by amanmehra and its overwhelming approval by my countrymen (Indians). For India's confused right-wing, everything negative that India does (or is mistakenly alleged to have done), is justified something by something negative that Pakistan did. Thankfully, we have other, more enlightened points of view in India, and they wrote our Constitution.
@Sudhanshu Swami: 'Mirch' is NOT written as 'Murch'. We have 'zer', 'zabar' 'paish' to denote sounds like aa eh ih ee oh. Thus 'mrch' is written in urdu with a 'zer' beneath the 'm' to denote the 'ih' sound which means that 'mrch' becomes 'mirch'. Please understand the language's script first before commenting.
Urdu is a national language of Pakistan and I have seen people from a different province meeting some of another person of a different province that when they cannot communicate in one or another language, they communicate with each other in Urdu language.
Just few days back I was reading a news item on ET that Pronvincial Minister of Sindh Mr. Nisar Khoro has asked all the private schools of Sindh that Sindhi language should be made compulsory, otherwise the private schools will be heavily fined.
Unfortunately or fortunately, Urdu is a very easy language to learn, speak, read and write, but the problem is that people who speak or write Urdu is not the same Urdu which should be called as proper Urdu.
One day I asked one peon in my office who is a Memon to go and ask the nearby bank if it is open tomorrow?
He came back to me and said: "Sahab, kal bank khuli huwi hai".
I tried to convince him that his Urdu sentence is wrong but he was sure that whatever he spoke was correct.
Then I asked him to accompany with me and took him to the bank again from where one lady who was working in the bank came out after finishing her job.
I told the lady that please tell to the Memon pron as what is the correct sentence? Whether "kal bank khuli wi hai, ya kal bank khula huwa hai?
The lady said the correct sentence in Urdu is "kal bank khula huwa hai".
From that day, the Memon peon has started differentiating between the masculine and feminine i.e. Muzzakar aur Mauonnas.
Anyways, I have noted down that even the anchor persons of Urdu TV channels (other than the regional language TV channels) do not 100% speak correct Urdu as well as the Urdu newspapers that are printed and published in Urdu language commits a lot faults in Urdu language.
As every one knows that Urdu is a mixture of Arabic and Persian language, and the only means of communication among the Urdu and non-Urdu speaking people is to communicate in Urdu and no other language.
I am of the opinion that the young generation must learn proper Urdu and Urdu should be made as a compulsory sujrft in all the schools, colleges and universities, so that people should know that Urdu is a national language of Pakistan before its complete demise.
Fake identities, histories, languages, anything don't survive.
Urdu is quintessentially an Indian language. In fact, scientists with no axe to grind are of the opinion that both Hindi and Urdu are registers (technical term for dialects) of a single language called Hindustani, whose parent is Khariboli, whose parent is Prakrit spoken in the Delhi/UP region, whose parent is Classical Sanskrit, whose parent is Vedic Sanskrit.
Before some one starts snorting ignorantly, borrowing lots of words from some other language or writing with a different script don't make a new language. The former could create a new dialect. Each language has many dozens. Hyderbadi Telugu has lots of farsi words, but not a new language. The script makes no difference at all - most languages are written with multiple scripts (think Turkish with roman and arabic scripts, or sanskrit with devanagari, brahmi, grantha, etc).
Urdu really has no historic roots in what is now geographically Pakistan, the misguided attempts of Jinnah et al notwithstanding. Forcing it on people will do no good in search of some false identity.
The cold fact is that subcontinental hindus, muslims, jains, sikhs all pretty much share the same the culture, language, food etc and rudely splitting them by religion (why religion?) for narrow political goals is a historical blunder that will keep on giving.
@MilesToGo: "Urdu is a mix of Arabic, Persian and Hindi. Why use a mix? Just use Arabic…" . According Webster's dictionary, English unashamedly borrows from 92 languages. Why don't they just shut up.
Whatever is said in this piece about Mirza Ghalib is misleading, to say the least. Ghalib is respected and admired by Indians. In fact there was a TV serial on Ghalib's life and times, produced by Gulzar, which crossed all benchmarks of popularity both in India and Pakistan. I feel very sad when writers like Pitafi display their ignorance and biases so openly. I give this link especially for the writer's information:
Naseeruddin Shah talking about Ghalib in Lahore...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgXbHX3_xIA
The whole serial can be still viewed on YouTube.
The human brain's vision system has evolved to interpret visual information by scanning left to right and top down. The right to left writing direction of Urdu/Farsi/Arabic cause spatial disorientation.
Urdu and Hindi are pretty much the same language. That is the reason Pakistan is the biggest market for Hindi films after India.
At best they are different dialects.
I don't understand how Urdu(one dialect) is Muslim and Hindi(another main dialect) is Hindu, I have no idea.
They both are Indian languages. Adding a few Persian words and changing the script, will not make it different languages.
The founders, the supposedly secular Jinnah and his League imposed Urdu ONLY because of this canard that Urdu is a different language and that too its Muslim.
I bet in a couple of generations, the actual languages of Pakistan will take a back seat and will be on its way to become dead languages.
Jinnah in his attempt to make Pakistan un-India, gave Pakistan a language, which ensures Pakistan will always be culturally dependent on India.
@undenialist: Do tell, what exactly are we in denial of? If someone's grave is converted into a urinal, it is regrettable regardless of whether the person wrote in Urdu, English or not at all. As someone rightly indicates in one of the comments above, we have abysmal standards when it comes to taking care of our heritage monuments and places of historical importance, and this too should be seen in that light - but the rest of your comment somehow makes it seem like this incident is part of yet another conspiracy against Urdu language or Islam or Pakistan.
@ahmed41: The IAS rank no. 1 of 2010 MR. Faisal of Kashmir had Urdu as one of his optional subjects.
Indian denialists. Read this on Ghalib's grave. Your paper not ours: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2008-06-30/delhi/277688661tomb-legendary-urdu-poet-chausanth-khamba Also please note that it is not ideology, it is about a language's right to exist. But what would you know. The story above says Ibrahim Zauq's grave was made a public urinal.
Pakistani Punjabis are probably the only species I know who take more pride in Urdu than their own their mother tongue. What is even more perplexing for me (a South Indian proud of my mother-tongue Telugu) is that Urdu has not been imposed on them by outsiders. They have chosen it on their own.
Pakistanis subconsciously give Arabic the highest order, followed by Persian and Turkic in the second tier, and then Urdu in the third stratum and look at the rest of Pakistani languages such as Pashto, Sindhi, Balochi and Hindko with disrespect.
I fail to see how anyone can respect his own culture when he is not ready to accept his mother tongue. Language, not religion, forms bulk of the culture. Hardly any Punjabi is spoken in Punjab Assembly. Punjabis who can't speak chaste Urdu are derided as 'Paindu'.
Pitafi, who is normally rational, seems to miss this point. He should worried about decline of Punjabi, not Urdu.
@SKChadha:
'-----Indian citizen can appear even in ICS exams with Urdu as medium---"
Good ! I am impressed . Can you, please, look up the official records to let us know how many Indian Citizens actually opt for answering the ICS examination papers using URDU.
It is so sad to see so many insecure Indians. News flash to all my North Indian friends, your ancestors were invaders too. Hindi is an Indo-Aryan language. You should apologize to your South Indian compatriots for stealing their land and suppresing their language.
@Tanu, Issue here is that Inodnesians are Indonesians, Bangladeshis are Bengali, Malasians are Malay. They all have their own clear cut identity. Pakistanis dont want themselves to identify themselves as Indians. So whatever that is related to India or Hinduism, they will try to detach themselves with that. They are Indian, or Afghani or Iraninans. But They want to relate themselves with Arabs. Urdu was mix of languages, for and of the people who were not knowing Hindi (khari boli etc) but had to communicate. Why Indian (Indian muslims) people wanted to relate themselves with Urdu is due to religion. They made their mind that we should write our language in Arabic script ! If you write urdu in Devnagri (Hindi) script then you fear that there will be no difference left. All mater is of 'being different', false feeling of being different. Politicians unnecessarily imposed foreign words and script on Indians (Indian Muslims) for a false pride. Fact is that Urdu script (a sub set of arabic) lacks Indian letters and pronunciations. Indians scripts have more sounds. and some of sounds which are missing can be written by using nukta etc. One cant write what he actually want to speak. For example, I seen lessons on Pakistan TV (almost 20 years back) that green chilly, Mirch is written as marach. He was saying , boli mirch jaati hai par likhten marach hai ! Why this all ? Just for having different identity ? And pushing Muslims into an area which is mostly of no use. Muslims who are already poor and less literate, they impose not useful script and words on them ? Two days back I had to go to other city, I hired taxi. Driver was muslim. Just while talks he said that learning Urdu is good, because one can get job in Govt run masjid and madarsa. Thats it ??? Pakistanis should know that Indians speak their regional language mainly. and more of regional words are mixed in Hindi when they speak hindi. Common Muslim dont understand urdu (arabian and persian words). If one want to save urdu, he should write it with Indian script.(In India) Urdu is used for political reasons. I remember that recently Indian govt developed and released Urdu Fonts. and their statement was that this will help 18 crore Indian Muslims. They want to make ALL muslims happy with statement. While no body will ask them that 18 crore muslims mein se padhna kitno ko aata hai. Aur kya jinko padhna aata hai unke paas PC hai ? I want to say that how words are exaggerated.
@Editor, my intentions are not against Urdu, I myself am admirer.
@Gul:
Gul , one can NOT really agree with you that HINDI and URDU are the same.
What's your definition of the term * language* ? I am sorry to ask for "definitions" since that sound like mathematics !!
One aspect of LANGUAGE is how the appeal of that language is in emotional terms to its users.
HINDI , the type written in deep text-books and the variety propagated by the Banarasi Hindi-wallas , is not my cup of tea.
Even the Government of India has quietly gone into HINDUSTANI which is in common usage , as opposed to the highly saskritized HINDI hindi .
As compared to PERSIAN, it is more difficult to learn URDU. For example, every noun has to be remembered by way of its gender. Why should a * kitab * be feminine gender ?
A person who knows real Hindi-type Hindi can not understand the poetry in URDU of Alama IQBAL ? How are the two languages the same ,in this respect ?
Way back in the 1942s , it was Mahatma Gandhi who wanted the national language of INDIA ( undivided) to be HINDUSTANI in both the Urdu_Farsi script and in the Devnagiri script.
I do remember , that my sisters learnt tis sort of HINDUSTANI in SCHOOL days till the early post-partition years. After that real HINDI-Nationalism took over.
I have rarely seen so many thoughtful comments on an issue on ET. Well done all. @wafa, Beautifully said.
@Farah.S:
Exactly stated !!! by Farah . That's called realism.
@BlackJack: Isn't it also true that many other monuments are also neglected in India as Ghalib's is? However what is more important is that we remember and admire his poetry.
Urdu is just another name of Hindi. The Hindi language got a different name of Urdu due to political, communal, sectarian and wasted interests of certain groups. Those wasted interests are in regression so the name Urdu is also in regression. Urdu has remained a tool of division. It caused communal, sectarian, ethnic and regional divisions. It divided subcontinent in 1947 then divided Pakistan in 1971. By nature it has historically been divisive. Now it's role as a divisive language is diminishing, so it's sinking to its rightly deserved position i.e. it's just another name of Hindi with another script. Hindi has more than 20 scripts in use.
Is it not surprising that our National Language, Urdu is the mother tongue of none of Pakistanis other than those who came here from India, whom we still like to call Muhajirs after 66 years? That cannot but be one of the reasons for Urdu to be where it is.
If this op ed is about state of urdu in pakistan, why focus on what happens to it in India? It is not because of India or state of urdu therein, it is healthy and thriving without problems there, that majority of populace rejected the language. Bengalis left you because you imposed you urdu on them. Sindhi hates the urdu speaker mojahir, and the the less said about the punjabi aversion to urdu language, culture, etc the better. As for Galib and his grave, it is obvious you have not read Galib. He wanted a grave in wilderness, unadorned, without a roof! Galib is revered as the most precious heritage and poet in India.
Problem with pakistan is its inability to accept the culture of the subcontinent. It rejects everything that it is contrary to its contrived narrative. An indonesian, or a malaysian or a burmese, or a bangladeshi muslim is proud of his heritage and do not desire to project themselves as muslims of Arab ancestory. Ask an arab if he accepts a pakistani as one of his own or equal. In this confusion you have let go of your rich heritage, culture, and now lament the demise and decay of your language, which is a beautiful and rich language.
By the way, in your own programmes as an anchor, have you ever reflected on the urdu, which is generouly mixed with everything including english, that you yourself speak?
Very disappointing writeup!!
We lost one part of country becuase of language issue, and now, we are on verge of loosing other parts. Urdu as a national language never been given due respect although its mode of communication in Pakistan. I rarely find any speech of Jinnah in Urdu who made Urdu language as our national language. I love to read Urdu literature than English or of my mother tounge.
Funny most comments posted are by Indians on Pakistani newspapers..Just goes to say journalism print or electronic, Pakistan has matured much faster. Even usually full of themselves Indians prefer to read and comment on Pakistani Op-eds as oppose to their own hyper-nationalist newspapers. Enjoy it to the fullest when one sees Indians attempt to go above and beyond trying to prove everything wrong in Pakistan. Thanks neighbors for the series of comedy you all write here :)
@zaman ali:
What you say is 100% true; however the challange is to keep alive,a national lannguage and a cultural language such as URDU.
Does all this depend only on the elite ?
Everywhere, the language spoken by the common man on the streets, is a more powerful index of its usage, than the saloons of the elite.
Persuade the common man to value his cultural languages.
Why has PERSIAN been discarded in Pakistan ? Is it for political reasons and a false hangup about being ARAB ?
I bet within few years all pakistanis will be more fluent in chinese and will claim chinese history as their own if arab abandons them....
In the dying days of Mughal rule, that is 1850's, Urdu was in its golden days. It was said the best gift a Delhi wallah can give to a guest or take from Shahjenhabad, a poem of Mir or Ghalib's scribbled on a sheet of paper. Mushairas and Ghazals in the Mughal court as well as in what is now Old Delhi were recited (and still to date in Old Delhi) till 3AM. Ghalib's house still survives in Old Delhi, not too far from Nizamudin. Urdu got orphaned with partition as not many people speak Urdu in Pakistan other than Muhajirs. Punjabi is spoken by a majority of Pakistanis - what did you expect!. Pakistan leaders now encourage their children to learn Arabic than Urdu or Farsi so that they are better
Muslims
.Mr Faruhk, Few facts for you: 1 Urdu was responsible for Division of Pakistan. 2 we forced minority language(language of UtterPardesh) on majority population ie Bengalis. Urdu is spoken language of only 7percent Pakistanis. It's 3 Urdu originated in India, propagated by British Imperialists. Remember Fort William College!! 4 Urdu has been imposed on Pakistanis T expanse of regional languages. Punjabis and Sindhis speak Urdu and we ought to be grateful to them.
Urdu always has been language of communication ONLY and will stay that way. For practical purposes, it has never been an official language. Sentimentality and skewed patriotism won't save this stagnant and rather incomplete language,
Urdu is a beautiful language as SRK sang ''Voh yaar hai jo khushboo ki tarah Voh jiski zubaan urdu ki tarah'' . The language is as beautiful and sweet as my beloved but in today's world it does not bring bread on the table that is the reality . Enjoy the beauty of the language but to earn bread and butter learn English and computers these are the tools of communication in the world today. Do not get confused enjoy the beauty of Urdu but earn your bucks in English it may help you buy some more CDs of your favourite gazals.
Ghalib: “Victim of a partition that left no future for his beloved language in his own beloved land.” “Hollywood movies dubbed in Hindi are shown on our television channels as Urdu versions.” “The failure of Urdu in India is understandable but after decades of state investment in the language, our ignoring it in Pakistan is downright criminal.”
Sir, I am pained to read your above narratives about Urdu. To understand position of Urdu in India please visit at: http://www.urducouncil.nic.in/ . For your information Urdu occupies the sixth position among the Scheduled Languages after Hindi, Bengali, Telugu, Marathi and Tamil but is far above Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Oriya, Punjabi and Assamese speakers. Only 13 languages out of 22 in India have more than 10 million speakers and Urdu is one of them.
Urdu is pure Indian language having its origin in Awadh. It was basically Hindi (Khadiboli) spoken by Muslim rulers of Awadh (Central India)? It has little vocabulary from Arabic, Persian and Turkish. Even the dialect is not Arabic. Urdu is only a SCRIPT (Nastaliq style with Persian alphabet and a bit of Arabic literary vocabulary). Pakistan has just adopted it and distorted it by adding Pashto, Punjabi, Sindhi and Balti words to it. Urdu is and was always a royal language and spoken in ‘Lakhnavi Andaz’. There is no denying of fact that our Muslim citizenry patronize it. We owe a lot to them for keeping this language alive in India.
Unlike Pakistan, in India we have 26 scheduled languages and Urdu is one of them. It is offcial language of many Indian States including West Bengal, UP, Delhi, J&K, Andhra Pradesh etc.. Indian citizen can appear even in ICS exams with Urdu as medium for examination. The total population of the areas where Urdu is official language exceeds total population of Pakistan.
"The failure of Urdu in India is understandable" why? We love our Urdu no less and it may be hard for a Pakistani to understand this, but the Indian Urdu is not defined or looked through the prism of any religion. We love our Urdu and we have kept it live in our day today lives.
I wonder if Pakistanis or Pakistan can ever grow out of India's shadow. You, tell me.
Urdu is a mix of Arabic, Persian and Hindi.
Why use a mix? Just use Arabic...
it is english that is causing the decline of all languages in south asia. the elite and the middle classes read,write,and even think in english, this phenomena is by no means unique to south asia in malasia nearly every one is fluent in english.
Criminals are those who fooled us to abandon our mother tongues and forced upon us a backward, useless language which lacks modern knowledge about science, technology and business. They kept English for themselves and taught common people a language which had no future.
Being part of a nation formed on the basis of disowning one's own legacy, all that one can do is cry in crippling helplessness, as the author describes. Having given up a legacy of a 700+ years Muslim rule over the sub-continent, losing a language is just a part of the same process. Shed no tears for Urdu in India. It is a part of India as is the Taj Mahal, Red Fort, Fathepur Sikri, Jama Masjid, Gol Gumbaz. Pakistan must now look towards the Middle East and Arabic. Urdu and and the legacy of 700+ years Muslim rule belongs to India and will thrive there.
How proficient was Mr. Jinnah in Urdu, when he wanted Urdu to be the national language of Pakistan, much against the opinion of the majority of Pakistanis (in 1947-48), that finally led to the creation of Bangladesh.
India is largely Hindu and graves are not given much importance. Ghalib is given due respect as a great poet - and I honestly would be happy if those people who wished could visit his grave, but let's not make a big issue of it. Urdu lives on in colloquial Hindi (the language used in cinema is not Sanskritized Hindi), and the script is of little importance to us Indians - we live with 20+ scripts and Urdu is just one of them. The average Indian has just as much exposure to Urdu script as he has to the script of a language that is not of his state - for example, Tamil - one of the few spoken languages that transcends classical, medieval and modern eras, but has little relevance outside the South of India. The problem is that Pakistanis define Urdu as a muslim language, and the need to keep the language alive is more from a political than a linguistic perspective - this is an argument based on a long-standing farce, and is doomed to fail.
What is everyone in Pakistan cribbing about?
I learned Sanskrit when I was a teen and I understand Urdu very well. Urdu is an amalgam. It is not a root language, rather it is derived. Unless you know Sanskrit and Farsi, you really don't understand Urdu. I might as well say right now itself that Urdu has nothing to do with Arabic except the script which is the same as Farsi.
It's not like a society sits down and wilfully decides to cast aside a language. A language survives if it has a living vibrant culture, contemporary intellectual discourse responsive to comteporary problems and, in today's world, economic relevance, to keep it thriving. It's our intellectual paralysis and cultural stagnation (or rather regression) that's killing Urdu. We havn't taken it into the modern world in terms of expression and content. It has little passing relation to current scientific or social theory knowledge. I mean how much is translated, let alone produced. The author is worrying about a symptom here; we should be really, really worried about the problem.
Pakistan is a country where a Pakistani English newspaper writes how Urdu is declining in the country in English.. I think that will do?? right? very effective indeed..
Amongst our political leaders who are the most articulate in Urdu? Maulana Fazal ur Rehman and Hafiz Husain Ahmed come to mind. In general politicians who come with genuine madressah education backgrounds speak Urdu much more fluently and CORRECTLY than others. Our previous president refused to swear the new prime minister in Urdu. Despite all the strengths that Urdu brings as a language to connect the people of Pakistan, our ruling elites really do not give a damn about it. Until and unless Urdu is given its due place as specified in the constitution of Pakistan its decay will continue. And of course if Urdu is treated so viciously what can one say of our regional languages? Urdu along with our regional languages make a package; any effort to give Urdu its right place and to spend resources on its progress will automatically advance all of our regional languages. This is particularly the case because all of these use the same basic script, rely on the same sources for their evolution and form a linguistic continuum in the areas that comprise Pakistan and northern India. Enabling Urdu effectively for use on computers and internet will cover our regional languages also at almost no additional cost.
Unfortunately our problems come from our ruling elites who do not represent the people that they rule - they all have a feudal mindset and consider the society to be strictly partitioned in to rulers, themselves, and the rest "untouchables" the remaining who are economically backward, speak languages such as Urdu, Pyshti, Sindhi, Seraiki, Punjabi, Balochi, Brahvi, Kashmiri, etc. Real leaders such as Jinnah Sahib recognized the importance of Urdu - despite his own Gujarati, English background - and did what they could to advance it. Our current rulers are and have been mental slaves of the West and live in perpetual inferiority complexes. Our elites children have been educated in English medium schools for decades now and now we are reaping the crop that we have sown. They can hardly speak Urdu - just listen to the TV talk shows and the anchors who conduct them = and can barely speak a mongrel language. How can authors, poets, writers of Urdu come out of this generation?
Couldn't agree more. I have been given an Urdu assignment of 1600 words by my professor, and as there is no user friendly Urdu word processor, I would have to write and edit it in Roman Urdu on MS Word and then copy it down in proper Urdu by my hand. And for those who are interested in knowing the state of Urdu in Pakistani young urban elite circles, have a look at my blog. http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/18776/is-this-the-death-of-the-urdu-language/
The govt. of India, in association with the National Council for Promotion of Urdu Language has released, for free download, Urdu Unicode fonts and keyboards compatible with Windows and Android platforms including with predictive text features
Really makes me feel sad. I still remember when I was a child, my parents compelled me to speak in English at home. Even today when I see around me people feel pride in speaking English instead of our own language. I totally agree with the writer but one point that I find missing in this piece of writing is the fact that after so many years of independence we are still suffering from inferiority complex. This is one of the major reasons.
With all due respect.Urdu is/was born indian natural language. It was a departing gift of 47 including land,water,money,heritage,history,etc. Unfortunate is that as of today 2013 ,you have lost everything.you have lost land,money, history,heritage,water and language plus sanity.
@pitafi Has Sanskrit remained in the land of panini ? why show hypocrisy ? You guys don't allow hindi and whine daily about urdu in india ! let me tell you majority of indians can choose hindi-urdu in their schools ,its not the government but indian people have rejected urdu as it was just a sham creation by muslim schools to prove muslim superiority in india .
_ Now let me tell you urdu and hindi are no languages ,they are ideological problems .Hindi derives its words from sanskrit and pali mostly while having persian and arabic also as donor on the other hand urdu derives from arabic and persian mostly _
We love our ancestors and you love the invaders that's the difference.