
A single bench, headed by Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, granted the temporary permission till November 12 by modifying its previous order through which the builder was specifically asked to stop construction. A DHA resident, Zahidullah Khan, had taken the DHA, Creek Developers, BF Property and Construction, and AKD Capital to court.
"The original master plan, issued by DHA, shows amenity plots allocated for a park, schools, sewerage treatment plant and a graveyard," the petitioner argued. The plaintiff's lawyer, Barrister Salahuddin Ahmed, argued that the amenity plot cannot be converted into residential or commercial property.
DHA's stance
DHA lawyer Abid S. Zuberi informed the court that the area was not meant for amenity purposes. The authority reiterated that the projects were part of the Creek City project, which spreads over 90 acres.
Builder's view
Creek Developers said that it had launched the project on July 12, 2003, while the construction work was initiated in 2009. It requested the court modify its previous restraining order and allow it to raise constructions at its own risk and cost, assuring that no third party interest would be created till the disposal of the case.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 10th, 2013.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ