Nobody and nothing is exempt from the rises in the prices of electricity, petrol and diesel fuels. PHOTO: FILE
The announcement of increases in the power tariff by between 40 to 80 per cent for domestic consumers may be a shock to the general public, but for the national money managers, it is just the next step in a painful process. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is a hard taskmaster, and for Pakistan to receive its latest bailout funding, strict conditionalities were put in place. The removal of subsidies in the power sector was one such condition and compliance is now moving ahead apace. Nobody and nothing is exempt from the rises in the prices of electricity, petrol and diesel fuels — a consequence of a rise in the latter being an inevitable increase in the cost of basic items as transporters will pass the rise to wholesalers and wholesalers to the retailers and the retailers to the consumer.
The rise in the cost of electricity has hit the poorest hardest, with only those who consume 200 units or less a month seeing no adjustment to their tariff. Domestic consumers of 201 to 300 units will see a rise of Rs5.89 a unit to Rs14 a unit; and those using 301 to 700 units a month will have to pay a rise of Rs3.67 taking their per-unit costs to Rs16. Those unlucky enough to use over 700 units will find their per-unit costs rising to Rs18, although this is arguably the wealthier section of the populace better able to absorb the rise. The agriculture sector, which has sustained considerable losses after standing crops were destroyed in the recent floods, is not exempt either. The tubewell tariff is to rise by Rs3.58 per unit to Rs10.35 which is going to hit small farmers very hard indeed.
The IMF is not the only factor in the power equation. Power generation is 68 per cent by diesel-run thermal power houses. Most of the fuel to run them has to be imported, the US dollar has risen and the rupee weakened. Power generation is uneconomic and any revision of the mix of generation sources will take a decade or more. The really bad news is that there is more pain to come. While the IMF may not have been the only factor responsible for this, the government perhaps should still have been more careful when negotiating with it, given the hard times ahead for the people of the country.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 2nd, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that a country which has a shortage of energy shouldn't be subsidizing energy prices. Further - shouldn't take a rocket scientist to determine that a country which for all practical purposes is bankrupt shouldn't be subsidizing anything. Long and short - higher energy prices maybe painful but will help solve the energy crisis - people tend to conserve when prices are high. The caveat is that govt needs to insure that people pay their utility bills.
More careful when negotiating with the IMF?
Such as.................