China welcomes Russia-US accord on Syria chemical weapons

The deal will help promote a peaceful resolution of the crisis.


Reuters September 15, 2013
A Free Syrian Army fighter moves along a trench with his weapon to avoid forces loyal to Syria's President Bashar al-Assad in eastern al-Ghouta, near Damascus. PHOTO: REUTERS

BEIJING: China on Sunday welcomed a deal reached by the United States and Russia to eliminate Syria's chemical weapons arsenal, saying it would help promote a peaceful resolution of the crisis.

After three days of talks in Geneva, US Secretary of State, John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov on Saturday demanded Syrian President Bashar al-Assad account for his secret stockpile within a week and let international inspectors eliminate all the weapons by the middle of next year.

"We believe that this framework agreement has ameliorated the present explosive and tense situation in Syria and has opened a new perspective on using peaceful methods to resolve the Syrian chemical weapons issue," Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told his visiting French counterpart, Laurent Fabius.

"China upholds the finding of an appropriate resolution to the Syrian issue, including that of the chemical weapons, under the framework of the United Nations," Wang added.

"The UN Security Council should play an important role in this ... Military methods cannot resolve the Syria issue."

France has called the deal to destroy the arsenal an "important step forward" and said that talks on Monday in Paris would focus on implementation.

China has called for a full and impartial investigation by UN chemical weapons inspectors in Syria, and warned against pre-judging the results, though it has also said that whoever uses chemical weapons had to be held accountable.

COMMENTS (1)

Ali Rizvi | 11 years ago | Reply

Putin has proved that he has global leadership qualities. Unlike of course Obama.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ