This ‘Akbari’/’Asghari’ mentality has often crossed my mind during various discussions and debates I’ve had with fellow Pakistanis on politics, social issues, development, sports, etc. We all have our own views and usually aren’t willing to adjust or change them. We talk about Pakistanis being stereotyped by other countries while we have, as a nation, championed the art of stereotyping people within our own country. We are not willing to look at the several shades of grey that actually exist, preferring to describe things as black or white.
This mentality of operating on extremes can be found almost everywhere, resulting in our society becoming more and more polarised. We have the all-righteous religious people who follow religion to the T and categorise anyone who does not wear their shalwar above their ankles as being a non-believer. On the other hand, we have our ‘liberals’, who have discarded religion completely and believe it to be the root cause of all of our problems today.
Another example of our ‘Akbari’ and ‘Asghari’ mentality is how society sees General (retd) Pervez Musharraf. When he first came to power, he was considered to be one of the best things to have happened to the country. When he stood up and shook hands with Vajpayee at the Saarc conference, we whooped for him. His policies on liberating media, opening up Pakistan’s cellular networks, increasing broadband, etc. were widely praised. Fast-forward to 2013 and now he is regarded as one of the worst things that happened to Pakistan. Everything from terrorism to power outages to inflation is because of him. He is referred to as one of the worst rulers Pakistan has had.
Looking at other political organisations, we view Pakistani political parties through the same ‘Akbari’/’Asghari’ lens. On one side, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) supporters view anyone criticising their party as committing blasphemy whereas the PTI’s detractors view it as a naive, right-wing organisation, rather than both viewing it as a dynamic new political entrant with its flaws and limitations.
Likewise, the military is considered by most liberals as the institution responsible for many of the problems of our country. However, hardly anyone recognises the thousands of lives lost trying to defend Pakistan.
What we are forgetting in this battle of colouring everything black or white are the multiple shades of grey that form the middle ground, which is often where reality lies. We have forgotten that there are always multiple perspectives, that people have both good and bad qualities and that moderation is required to move ahead and progress. We talk about education and development and extremism but nothing will change unless we change our ‘Akbari’/’Asghari’ mentality. This problem runs across all classes, religions, races and education levels in the country. If even education does not teach us tolerance and moderation, then let us stop and think where we are going wrong.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 8th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (18)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
A very balanced article. I completely agree with you. And it is not about numbers, it is about influence. So the liberals might be less in numbers, but they have (even more) influence through media. Also, in terms of attitudes, the liberals are no less rigid then the religious extremists. The liberals are always ready, like the religious extremists, to issue a FATWA against anyone trying to disagree with them. Alas, life is too difficult for moderates in this country.
TTP have once again extended a hand of friendship and reasonable negotation with liberal Pakistanis. I hope this opportunity will be taken by others and Pakistan will take its destined path to achieving peace, stability, progress, and justice for all.
The author and other similarly talented analysts have an important role to play in hastening the arrival of such much-needed peace with justice to Pakistan.
Rightly pointed out most acute illness of our society in Pakistan, may be world over.
Righty pointed out acute illness of our society in Pakistan ,may be world over. We see only Friend / Foes, Rehman/ Shatan High/ Low. If not Friend , then Enemy. Only polarised behaviour eating us out. Proud of you my Fulbright scholar. Another dimension
Rightly pointed out most acute illness of our society in Pakistan. May be world over.we see only friends/ foes, Rehman/ Shatan ,high/low. The only polarised attitude is spread all over. Proud of you my Fulbright scholar. This is new dimension of you.
A thoughtful, sensitive, nuanced analysis. If one starts from the premise that Pakistan belongs to all, then all must be respected, and Pakistan's vision ought to be the vision shared by all. Fortunately, Islam provides a comprehensive, practical and progressive moral and material framework for all of mankind's shared living and common improvement.
This is cool. So nothing is right and nothing is wrong everything is grey.
White and balck can be made grey (and even colorful)through reason,negotiation and tolerance;and not going for the gun to make it red.
@faraz: Excellent comment Faraz ! Today most young journalists are really incapable of independent thinking, leave aside having the capability to analyze and deduce. Like parrots repeating what they have heard elsewhere, intention solely being not to ruffle any feathers or challenge an untenable narrative. The issue of terrorism and violence has got nothing to do with liberals anywhere including Pakistan, they are not holding guns and killing those whose views differ. Author is unable to see the difference either due to intellectual poverty or ideological affinity.
So what you are saying is that we need more tolerance. The subject is good but you have approached it in a bit of a simple manner, like the examples you gave were wishy-washy. 180 million strong Pakistani Muslims will stand up and claim ' .......but Islam teaches us tolerance. ' and then turn around and kill the Muslim next to him for not being the right type of Muslim. This sickness has been deliberately injected into us years ago, so that the political end of retaining power / control remains with a few. The fact that this is destroying the country is possibly understood by them but it seems they are incapable of addressing it.
Isn't this because of such immense differences between the education and upbringing of Pakistanis? There is a huge gap in what type of education one gets. The family influences are also very important. These things count in building up perception of things which are so strong that, every one of us, excluding very few open minded people, tend to see things in black and white. But there's more to it. I think its the way you perceive things, it's the glasses u wear(of biased-ness and prejudice ) which controls your judgement. For example, if one recognizes MQM as a mafia, has personal experience proving that, has seen MQM terrorizing karachites, has received extortion receipts (or whatever) from MQM, and so on... he will not give a damn about what they have done to build Karachi and probably this person will have his own arguments regarding what MQM really did to Karachi. This was just a small example. Issues range from religion to culture to politics to whatsoever. People have valid (not necessarily reliable) arguments for what they belief to be true and this is because they care for that particular thing.
In a nation like Pakistan, I would assume that the issue is not just the people see things in terms of Black and White, but they see Black as White as well. Maybe you should focus on those issues instead of trying to find a "Grey" middle ground where everyone can stay confused.
@Anon: @faraz:
No, faraz is right. Sometimes such false neutrality or false equivalence does not apply. When there is something very wrong, it is hard not to be polarized against it. The Salman Taseer assassination by Mumtaz Qadri, and lawyers throwing petals, certainly exposed this polarization. There's really little to no grey area there.
His questions on Malala Yousafzai are legit. We might as well apply the same cop out on the militant TTP, or sectarian extremist groups like LeJ, and claim they're not villains but 'in between' heroes and villains. Its ridiculous. That is not being objective, but lacking positive principled ethical values and intelligence.
I can certainly try to understand some moderation in regards to someone's support for a political party, even a questionable leader or individuals, because of so many different factors, but there are instances and situations which are clear cut, not complicated by the environment and a line must be drawn. Some-things are not a matter of opinion, and can be so wrong, highlighting a product of regressive mindset and attitudes.
There is no substance in the article. For the color blind everything will be black and white, however they form a microscopic minority of any society, Pakistan being no exception.
A good article. Agree that most Pakistanis tend to take an extreme view in a situation which makes it hard to see the other side or even the possibility to discuss it. Clearly we are becoming a very unforgiving nation and will try to enforce our views even if they are wrong.
@faraz: Tada! well done proving her point...
So our problem is liberals who have discarded religion? How much killings and disruption did these 2 dozen atheist liberals cause? Which Pakistan are you taking about? There are no poles; 90% Pakistanis are solidly right wing. Stop drawing false comparisons between extremists and liberals to dilute the issue of extremism that is destroying the country. This technique of creating a false binary and posing as centrist moderate is so passé
So you think Malala is somewhere between a hero and a disgrace? btw, why isn't she a hero
U remind me my school days Urdu book where we used to read this story of akbary/asghari I think the best to say army/politition are Akbaries and peoples of Pakistan Asgharies.