Hajj corruption case: SC rejects application seeking immunity for Gilani

Yousaf Raza Gilani was accused of 'illegally' appointing Rao Shakeel as D-G Hajj affairs.

Web Desk July 04, 2013
Yousaf Raza Gilani was accused of 'illegally' appointing Rao Shakeel as D-G Hajj affairs. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court rejected an application seeking immunity for former prime minister Yousaf Raza Gilani in the Hajj corruption case on Thursday, reported Express News.

Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said that the Religious Affairs ministry should refrain from looting people, and adjourned the hearing till July 23.

Gilani was accused by former establishment secretary Ismael Qureshi of “illegally” appointing Rao Shakeel as director-general of Hajj affairs. Ismael had claimed that Gilani ignored his advice against Shakeel’s appointment and also appointed Zain Sukhaira as Information Technology advisor.

The Supreme Court later took notice of both appointments, which were subsequently reversed, but directed Gilani to submit his response over his exemption from investigation into the case. The law secretary was also ordered to explain why the investigation officer was asked to drop inquiry against Gilani.


Former Federal Minister for Religious Affairs Syed Hamid Saeed Kazmi, Rao Shakeel and former additional secretary to ministry of religious affairs Raja Aftabul Islam were accused of indulging in widespread corruption during the course of renting residential buildings for Pakistani pilgrims in Saudi Arabia at exorbitant rates and inflicting a loss of a billion rupees to the national exchequer.

Most of the buildings rented by the Hajj administrators were five kilometres away from the Haram Sharif, while according to law the accommodation for Hajjis should not be more than two kilometres away.


ali ahmed | 10 years ago | Reply

Mr.CJ ..when the decision will come

Ali Tanoli | 10 years ago | Reply

These mazarath walay make so much money from donation of blind faith innocent muslims and then there greeds take them to govt I wonder how much is enough to live 60 or 70 years of life.....

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ