Settlement risks

Without some deterrence, crime will only increase.


Editorial May 17, 2013
Screenshot from video which captured the murder of Sarfraz Shah in 2011. PHOTO: EXPRESS

According to reports, the brother of Sarfraz Shah, the 19-year-old shot dead in Karachi’s Benazir Bhutto Shaheed Park in June 2011 by Rangers personnel, has announced that he has chosen to “forgive” the seven men convicted in the case by an anti-terrorism court. Salik Shah also submitted an application before the Sindh High Court (SHC), seeking a settlement of the matter. He insisted no money had changed hands and his decision had been taken in the “name of God”.

We must hope the application filed is not accepted by the SHC. Murder is a crime against the state in most legal codes, rather than one committed against an individual. The fact that this issue tends to become somewhat confused within our own legal system, with, at times, even “blood money” playing a part under the Qisas and Diyat laws, sometimes leads to miscarriages in justice. The role of the state should loom even larger in this case since the unfortunate Sarfraz was killed by one of its agencies. The Anti-Terrorism Court condemned one of them to death, the other six to life-terms. The extra-judicial killing was captured on video and the clip broadcast over the media. It shocked many at the time, with the Supreme Court taking suo-motu notice of the horrific incident.

It is crucial that offenders in such cases be punished and an example set for the future. The fact that all too often this does not happen can only encourage others to act in an equally brutal fashion. Without some deterrence, crime will only increase. This indeed is one reason why even decades after they were first heard of, extra-judicial killings continue in our country. There have been many victims besides Sarfraz Shah. It is important the courts recognise the need to treat such crimes as one committed against the state. No individual should be able to simply forgive, brushing a terrible act of murder aside, given the implications this has for other citizens who could just as easily fall victim in such a manner.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 18th, 2013.

COMMENTS (2)

ijazmir | 11 years ago | Reply Hi Guys Justice has been done, punishment has been awarded. Forgiveness is part of Islam.
Mirza | 11 years ago | Reply

What a great and exemplary editorial by ET staff, thanks for that. I agree with every word of it. Murder blatant and coldblooded while wearing public funded clothing and using our weapons has no excuse in a civilized society. After high treason this is the worst crime and the state has to prosecute it to the full extent of the law. Those who are paid to keep us safe and protect us from these crimes and unjust killings cannot be allowed to do it themselves and get away with it. They should be made an example out of their bloodletting of innocent teens. If we do not prosecute them the crimes by the law enforcement agencies would continue to gain momentum.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ