There are certain elements in both countries that are supporting terrorism and causing instability. The governments of both countries should jointly take steps to tackle them instead of getting entangled in another war of words or retaliatory practices. The two sides should agree to work together to fight terrorism in letter and inspirit.
It is important that both neighbours should maintain good relations for peace to prosper in the region. The central issue here is what will happen in Afghanistan and the region in the lead-up to the Nato pullout? The need of the hour is for all stakeholders to show statesmanship and start engaging at a productive level. Moreover, the “strategic depth” policy should be scrapped once and for all. It is important that only the Afghan people decide their own form of government and destiny. Relations will only improve once this is ensured.
Both Pakistan and Afghanistan have faced misery, pain, trials and tribulations that have affected us over the past 30 years; one way or the other, both nations have been scarred and wounded by three decades of conflict and violence in this region. The most agonising aspect of these years has been the way this prolonged conflict has brutalised our societies and has all but dismantled and destroyed time-honoured traditions, codes of conduct and human values that sustained our societies. Clashes between Afghan and Pakistani forces will only help our common enemy — i.e., the militant forces bent on creating havoc in the region. We should recognise this fact and fight militancy together, instead of wasting our time fighting each other.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 4th, 2013.
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Feroz: "...its cause is ideological and does not respect anything else like borders." What ideological causes? Both are Islamic republics. They are brothers in Islam. This is a statement of contradictions. Either you are Muslim and don't believe in borders; or, if you believe in a border, then you shouldn't call yourselves Islamic republics. ""...does not respect anything else like borders."? The whole problem is of the Durand Line - a border by definition - which Pakistan believes is its border and which Afghanistan contests. Can you explain what are the bases of your statement?
The militant forces threatening both countries is very powerful and has the backing high up. It has the capacity to destroy both countries because its cause is ideological and does not respect anything else like borders.
Statement from Pakistan: "There are certain elements in BOTH COUNTRIES that are supporting terrorism and causing instability. The governments of both countries should JOINTLY TAKE STEPS to tackle them instead of getting entangled in another war of words or retaliatory practices. The TWO SIDES should AGREE TO WORK TOGETHER to fight terrorism in letter and inspirit."
Shown in bold and upper-case are the words that are frequently used by Pakistan in many such occasions. Only time Pakistan refused to use words like both sides, jointly, work together, etc., was during the Salala incidence when Pakistan refused US offer for a "Joint Investigation". Another occasion where Pakistan would have definitely refused would be if US had called for a joint investigation on the presence of OBL in Abottabad.
Draw your own conclusions.