Dasti’s re-election challenged in SC

Petitioner holds Dasti guilty of impersonation, using forged documents.


Qaiser Zulfiqar September 23, 2010

ISLAMABAD: A petition was filed in the Supreme Court on Wednesday, challenging Jamshed Dasti’s re-election from NA-178 Muzzaffargarh 111.

Petitioner Nawabzada Adnan Ahmed Khan has prayed to the court to grant leave to appeal against the order passed by the Lahore High Court’s (LHC) Rawalpindi Bench on August 9.

In his petition, he submitted that Dasti was elected in the by-election held on May 15 after securing 53,811 votes against 50,102 secured by his opponent Nawabzada Iftikhar Ahmed Khan Babar.

After the election, he said, Babar filed an election petition with the Election Commission of Pakistan, challenging Dasti’s right to contest the polls since the Supreme Court had already disqualified Dasti for having a fake degree. Babar also filed a writ petition before the LHC on the same grounds in the nature of a quo warranto invoked in public interest. However, the LHC dismissed the petition on August 9, saying they could not rule on it as the matter was pending with the election commission.

He stated that the LHC had erred in holding that “admittedly the petitioner has also filed an election petition against Jamshed Dasti which is pending before the learned Election Commission of Pakistan, which has taken cognizance of the matter”.

He recalled that the Supreme Court, in its March 25 judgment, held that Jamshed Dasti had managed to “sneak” into the National Assembly by making a false statement on oath and by using forged documents. The petitioner said that Dasti was guilty of impersonation and of being a party to making false documents and then dishonestly using them for his benefit.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 23rd, 2010.

COMMENTS (2)

Shahzad Khan | 13 years ago | Reply Despite of too much propaganda by media against Jamshed Dasti, he still managed to get relected. I think mandate of people should be respected.
Sultan Ahmed. | 13 years ago | Reply It depend on the court decision should wait, so no comments.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ