Geelani, Mirwaiz boycott meeting on Kashmir

Key local leader­s refuse to meet Indian law makers and say New Delhi has no answer­s to the region's crisis.


Afp September 20, 2010

SRINAGAR: An all-party group of Indian lawmakers visited violence-wracked Kashmir on Monday but key local leaders refused to meet them and said New Delhi had no answers to the region's crisis.

Hopes that the visit could break the cycle of violence were undermined by the decision of Kashmiri separatist leaders to reject the offer of face-to-face talks.

Syed Ali Geelani, the veteran separatist who has organised the almost daily demonstrations throughout the summer, rejected any meeting, saying nothing positive could emerge from it.

"It is a farce that they come here, saying they are assessing the situation, when everyone knows that innocents are being killed and the curfews have turned much of Kashmir into a jail," Farooq told AFP.

"We can not support these half-hearted gestures that are just to make the government look as if they are serious."

Separatists Mirwaiz Umar Farooq and Yasin Malik also declined to meet with the all-party delegation, their supporters told reporters on Monday morning.

Mehbooba Mufti, leader of the state government opposition, said she would send party members to the talks at a conference centre in the region's main town of Srinagar, but would not attend herself.

"They know my views, and we have not changed any policy," she said, adding that a strict curfew across Kashmir should be lifted immediately.

The delegation from New Delhi, led by Home Minister P. Chidambaram, also planned to meet representatives of the struggling tourism industry and other businesses, according to officials.

"We have to talk to each other. And those who have grievances against the government have to talk to the administration," Prime Minister Singh said last week.

But solutions to the unrest in Kashmir, home to a 20-year insurgency against Indian rule, appear as distant as ever, with public resentment hardening with each civilian death.

Delegates did not speak to the media early Monday, but Pawan Kumar Bansal of the ruling Congress party said Sunday that they would be getting "direct feedback from the ground".

"I will not raise the expectations. It is part of a long-drawn process which we have to carry out," he said. Among the delegates was Arun Jaitley, a senior figure in the main Hindu nationalist BJP opposition, which opposes making any security or political concessions to separatists.

Indian politicians head to Kashmir as death toll soars past 100

A group of Indian lawmakers on Monday visit violence-wracked Kashmir, where more than 100 civilians have been killed in months of clashes between protestors and security forces.

The government announced the all-party fact-finding mission last week after an emergency meeting in New Delhi following almost daily violent separatist demonstrations in the region throughout the summer.

"We have to talk to each other. And those who have grievances against the government have to talk to the administration," Prime Minister Manmohan Singh told the meeting on Wednesday.

But answers to the unrest in Muslim-majority Kashmir, home to a 20-year insurgency against Indian rule, appear as distant as ever with public resentment hardening with each civilian death.

The delegation, led by Home Minister P Chidambaram, will meet representatives of the struggling tourism industry and other businesses, as well as political groups, according to officials.

It is the first time a minister or mainstream political leader has visited the region since the demonstrations began in June.

"All of us will be getting direct feedback from the ground and we will be there to acquaint ourselves with the situation," one delegate, Pawan Kumar Bansal of the ruling Congress party, told reporters on Sunday before the visit.

"I will not raise the expectations.... To say that tomorrow the Kashmir problem is going to be solved will not be correct."

The Press Trust of India news agency reported that there would be 38 delegates including Arun Jaitley, a senior figure in the main Hindu nationalist BJP opposition, which opposes making any security or political concessions.

Plans to hold talks with all factions in Indian Kashmir appeared to have been dashed by leading Kashmiri separatist Syed Ali Geelani's refusal to participate.

In the wave of rallies that began on June 11, paramilitary troops have regularly opened fire after coming under attack from violent anti-India protestors throwing rocks and stones.

Many of those killed have been young men or teenagers, and news of each death has brought more people on to the streets and led to further deadly clashes with the security forces.

Police said a 22-year-old woman was killed during protests on Sunday evening in the northern town of Sopore, bringing the number of protestors and bystanders to have died to 106.

Curfews and strikes have shut down the region's summer capital Srinagar and many others towns for weeks at a time, with residents complaining of shortages of food and essential medicine.

Kashmir, a beautiful mountainous region in the Himalayan foothills, has been a regular flashpoint between India and Pakistan since the partition of the subcontinent in 1947.

The two rival nations fought wars over control of Kashmir immediately after partition, leaving it divided between Indian and Pakistani sectors, and again in 1965. The prime minister's office said the delegation's trip would "form an important input into the government's evolving response" to the situation in Kashmir.

COMMENTS (17)

an | 13 years ago | Reply Kashmiri leader should understand that they cant get independce as it is a security risk for india. These leaders are destroying the life of ordinary kashmiris and are causing the spilling of innocent kashmiri blood in vain. Negotiate for some autonomy within India. Try to excel in education and bring peace in kashmir.
SKChadha | 13 years ago | Reply Kashmiri Bhai – I think we are entering into un-necessary Tu Tu Main Main forgetting Kashmir? Have I ever said India does not have any problem, sectarianism or violence? Probably, the problems in India are much more than what you can even imagine or quote. However, please realize that with each passing day and year they are diminishing and the country as a whole is on progressive path. In India we cajole, entice, criticize and persuade each other on religious beliefs and enjoy or feel annoyed but do not have feeling of hatred for each other. If you feel it is the same in Pakistan or even better, no problem ….. Congratulations ….!!! You are quoting absence of women lawyers in Indian courts and I can’t dispute this fact. Even if the court you are referring has women lawyers, this facility is not available in many courts in India. However, on the other hand, please realize that people in Balawaristan do not have right to go to High Court or Supreme Court? So, I am not at all interested in such Tu Tu Main Main. Please do not quote stray incidences from past. It will be endless futile exercise for both of us. We are not sitting in Majalis-e Aza to ignite emotions remembering the horrific past. My problem is that I want to read the report which you have quoted in your comments. Can you provide me the link, reference, factual record or any other reliable authentic source? I will be thankful to you.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ