Who is Owais 'Tappi' Muzaffar, SC asks

Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi maintained that Owais Tappi has a stronghold over Karachi because of Shahzar Shamoon.


Web Desk February 28, 2013
Pakistani policemen stand guard in a troubled neighbourhood in Karachi. PHOTO: AFP

KARACHI: The Karachi registry of the Supreme Court issued a notice to Owais 'Tappi' Muzaffar on Thursday to present himself in court at the coming hearings of the Karachi law and order case, Express News reported.

Tappi is considered as one of President Asif Ali Zardari's closest aides and has been widely known as being a key power player in the Lyari gang wars.

Justice Sarmad Usmani was visibly frustrated as he remarked, “who is this Tappi and why has no one filed an FIR against him yet?”

Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi, responsible for filing the petition maintained that Owais Tappi has a stronghold over Karachi because of Shahzar Shahmoon, a senior member of the Federal Board of Revenue.

According to Naqvi, Owais Muzaffar, revenue officer Riaz Mohammed, Hammad Chachar, and others were involved in corrupt activities because of which the National Treasury was incurring losses worth billions of rupees.

These corrupt practices also included the illegal selling of government property.

The case stems from the suo motu proceedings initiated by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry in August 2011 as the city went through one of its bloodiest summers.

COMMENTS (9)

Yours Top | 11 years ago | Reply

I think Chief Justice must use Google search engine and just search "owais tappi" he fine more detail about him ... google Baba Zindabaad :)

Syed Hasan Atizaz | 11 years ago | Reply

Justice Sarmad Usmani was visibly frustrated as he remarked, “who is this Tappi and why has no one filed an FIR against him yet?”

lol, as justice shahab is either newly inducted or maybe living in his own world - doesnt he know what happens when you get FIR registered against such people. -

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ