Lahore high court hears petition filed by JuD chief Hafiz Muhammad Saeed.
The CJ while hearing a petition moved by Jamatud Dawa (JuD) chief Hafiz Muhammad Saeed against US drone strikes in Pakistan, said the federal government had failed to protect the lives and properties of people of Pakistan.
The CJ asked the deputy attorney general, appearing on behalf of the federal government, whether such strikes were being made with the permission of government and whether steps had been taken to stop the killings of innocents in these attacks.
The court directed the federal government to submit record of agreement, if any, between Pakistan and the US on the drone attacks.
Advancing arguments, JuD chief’s counsel AK Dogar claimed that protecting the lives and properties of the citizens of Pakistan was a prime responsibility of the state. If, however, the state was involved in murdering its own citizens after joining hands with another country, it was then the duty of the judiciary to ask government that why it was not performing its Constitutional duties, the counsel said.
Hafiz Muhammad Saeed in his petition had sought directions to the federal government to make public information in all matters of public importance, especially of any secret ‘deals’ with US in implementation of article 19-A of the constitution which entitles every citizen of Pakistan to have access of all information.
The JUD chief had asked the court to declare that pre-emptive strikes by foreign countries were not permitted under international laws, therefore, every man, woman and child has the right to seek protection.
The court asked the federal government to file reply at the next date of hearing, set for March 7, 2013.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
And this is the same High Court that has acquitted dozens of known terrorists responsible for hundreds of murders. Guess anything goes as long as it is in the name of religion.
The only thing this will do is shut those people up who were calling Imran Khan, a Taliban supporter due to his opposition to drone strikes...they will now whine and cry and try to come up with arguments to support drone attacks..regardless of it being unconstitutional. . So other than resolving some fights and instigating some other fights on facebook and twitter, this judgement is useless.
The wiki-leaks show that drone strikes were permitted by the army leadership. If drone strikes are unconstitutional then the army leadership should be tried for treason.
constitution of pakistan is only applicable near elections....LHC was sleeping before that?
Constitution of Pakistan does not apply to FATA.
After soooooooo long time LHC is taking up this matter....why now?
"Death of citizens by drone strikes against Constitution: LHC"
Right. Next LHC should opine on what the constitution says about death in suicide blasts and death in target killing.