A Facebook president?

A dictator proposes to come out of retirement to do politics on the strength of a Facebook page.


Ayesha Tammy Haq September 16, 2010
A Facebook president?

It was bound to come down to this, as divorced as we are from real life and given our predilection for all things virtual, we were destined to have a Facebook president. We the chattering classes, in doing so, will be sure to not think, or act, or make any effort whatsoever that may involve mental or physical muscle and through those omissions we shall ensure the infliction of yet another incompetent or, in this case, the same incompetent on this country.

If you revisit our glorious and fairly recent past it is loud and ostentatious, which is sometimes mistaken for glamour — swashbuckling cricketers, tragic heroine politicians, the odd millionaire with a boat in the south of France and a flat in one of the smarter sections of London. None of which translated into strong institutions, policy or industry. It raises an important question. Do we have the depth and thereby the capacity to transcend the ordinary, to think, to analyse, to go beyond? As my friend Zahir Riaz, lamenting the fact that nobody reads and referring to our newfound admiration for TED, put it we are taken by ‘the 19-minute idea’. It underpins the problem; we are just not willing to apply ourselves in any way whatsoever, if someone can talk you up in 19 minutes and if it sounds convincing it’s good enough. No need for independent study or confirming the veracity of the story or even having your own story, virtual is good enough and its short cuts all the way.

It’s our penchant for quick fixes; buzzwords and catch-phrases that have ensured a numbing of the mind, no analysis, just momentary emotion that can switch sides the next moment to be a part of the next emotion. It is this that takes us back time and again to military rule which, on average, we tire of in 10 years or so, go back to civilian rule, which we barely tolerate for two years and demand mid-term elections. A round of political musical chairs and several short-lived governments later it’s the military’s turn again. There is lots of shouting about how we learn nothing from our past and that is absolutely true, we learn nothing because we have no interest whatsoever in learning. We haven’t learnt about capacity building, the importance of education, the right to question and demand that the government do its work. Ever thought of why we don’t challenge the military’s self-proclaimed right to rule and why we wait for it to dig itself in to a hole first? Some say we are lazy, others that we don’t care but most say it’s just easier being intellectually dishonest. It’s easier to pretend that destroying institutions is a trade-off to fight against corrupt politicians not thinking that the only permanent solution to corruption is a system that ensures accountability across the board, be it the military, the bureaucracy, the executive, political forces and even the judiciary. This system is not something that falls out of the sky and presents itself, it is something we work very hard at to ensure it is not just there but it works and for all.

So today, a dictator proposes to come out of retirement and head back to Pakistan to do politics on the strength of a Facebook page. Just when it looked like we were all set to welcome him back having forwarded welcome text messages and tweets, our prime minister, perhaps feeling his back against the wall, stepped up to the plate and said that the general would find himself in court on return — facing indictment under Article 6 no doubt. Perhaps our political forces have been compelled to realise that there can be no shortcuts. That their survival lies with a strong and independent judiciary, not one that has been beaten and compromised. But this is only the beginning and until we cease to fear and realise how important an asset an educated population is, we aren’t going anywhere. As for the general and his cyber-dream — “woh kaun hai jinhein tauba ki mil gaee fursat, humain gunah bhi karnay ko zindagi kum hai”.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 17th, 2010.

COMMENTS (64)

Asfandyar Munir | 14 years ago | Reply A persona, even if he is a saint....who by all means should face high treason and murder chargers....SHOULD NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT RETURNING TO THIS COUNTRY!!!!!!
Sarfraz Hussain Naqvi | 14 years ago | Reply Sana you are right what you said. To add further, close and critical examination of the democratic governing mechanisms currently operating in Pakistan, with reference to the democratic content in its makeup, reveals the following:- 1. Voters are empowered once in four or five years when the election is to take place. This empowerment attains physical dimensions only for a few minutes when the voter is going through the process of vote casting. In our context the voter is, however, constantly subjected to a number of pressures before, during and even after these moments of empowerment. Some of these are the family bondage, the baggage of social environments, the influence of poverty, the culture of use of unbridled power by the mighty ones and their projected promises regarding provision of basic civic needs. In such scenario it is only unfair to consider such an exercise a free, fair and impartial use of the power of vote. 2. A sizeable majority (over fifty-five percent with reference to the 2008 general elections of Pakistan) of the voter population prefers to stay out of the entire electioneering process thus rendering the whole exercise anything but democratic. This scenario gets further polluted when the majority of the absenting voter class comprises of the relatively independent and educated lot of the society. 3. Influence of the organized media, the momentum of the force of governing mechanism in place and the charm of the charismatic personality aspiring to come or be in power are some of the other distracting factors that simply make fun of the democratic content of the systems in vogue. Orchestration of the ballot box counts, employing innumerable methods of pre and post poll rigging and obtaining results of own liking employing various tiers of the governing mechanism are too well known aspects operating, in varying degrees, against the spirit of democracy almost in all the present day governing systems. 4. Party based political activities are naturally and normally hostage to the party line that is mostly guided (or one may say misguided) and controlled by a person, a family or at best a group with vested interests. Thus the party bosses are mostly able to obstruct, deshape and destroy the bona fide spirit of democratic dispensation. In Pakistan’s political scenario this aspect, besides breeding corruption and abuse of power has been observed frustrating even the process of law making and also the initiation and launching of development projects of common good of the country and the society. 5. Centralized control of national resources, besides breeding corruption and inefficiency, continues to be employed as a tool to subvert the democratic desires and inclinations of the voters as well. This phenomenon not only helps in destabilizing and derailing the desired democratic way of life but also spreads dissatisfaction and disenchantment amongst the masses. In our context irritants amongst the provinces and the center often take birth consequent to this aspect. 6. In the prevalent election culture of our country it is mostly the influential, often the corrupt, and to a large extent the dirty rich persons that stand a fair chance of imposing their desire of becoming voter’s representatives. God fearing and the good lot of humans find it awfully difficult and painfully cumbersome to measure to the challenge and thus they normally prefer to stay out of the entire electioneering process. 7. Administrative and other set ups put in place to make the governing mechanism functional have not only become inordinately corrupt and inefficient but also awfully slow in responding to the needs of the masses. These set ups over the years have become monstrous masters instead of servants. Is it correct to assume that we are unable to think of a system that can remedy the above shortcomings? Certainly not. Let us ponder over this and suggest a viable system. Let us see you making a beginning!
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ