Naturally, one was tempted to compare Rahul Gandhi’s debut speech with Bilawal Bhutto’s, which echoed a traditional and exhausted leadership style. Some Indian friends were quick to remind me of the difference in age between the two — while Bilawal is in his 20s Gandhi is in his mid-40s — suggesting that the former may improve with time.
An Indian friend was of the view that it was possible that India’s political trajectory may not change in 2014 and would wait another four to five years before transformation took place. Such an assessment was based on an assumption that the restless and argumentative young Indian might still be too lazy to come out and vote in the next elections. Similar are the concerns in Pakistan and so, when people say that millions support new parties or leaders, one is not sure what kind of victory it will translate into.
Whether new parties will succeed in the coming elections or the one after is not the real issue. The key factor is that both states are experiencing a demographic shift which means increase in the number of young people who may not be satisfied with the traditional method of politics or be willing to remain part of traditional patronage structures. If old parties have to survive then they have to play a different music for a more restless audience.
The recent opinion polls by US-funded think tank IRI (International Republican Institute) in Pakistan showed an increase in PML-N’s popularity even in Sindh where the PPP is believed to be the only or the key choice of the general public. Although the opinion polls indicate a dramatic reduction in the PPP’s popularity, Bhutto’s party still has some future in Sindh. This fact alone shouldn’t result in complacency because the overall situation for the party is not very exciting. Since its inception at the end of the 1960s when it dominated Punjab, it has been reduced mainly to rural Punjab and Sindh. Besides losing its urban base, the party has also begun to behave like a network, especially in the two provinces, Punjab and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, where party politics has practically been outsourced to political warlords like Manzoor Wattoo in Punjab or Anwar Saifullah in K-P. Over the past three to four decades the PPP has even been limited to pockets in urban Sindh.
Here, I am not analysing how this descent came about but just drawing a picture of the challenges faced by a party usually viewed as the only true national party to have emerged after 1947. It may or may not get swept out in the coming elections. In fact, it will still be around in the 2013 elections. However, this conclusion would not suffice for the party leadership that will find it difficult to attract a new breed of jiyalas who would be committed to an ideology. The jiyalas of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto days were men and women who were attracted to the party due to its promise of better distribution of resources and egalitarian politics. The older generation of party faithful remains and is still hooked on to what the PPP offered ideologically despite that its leadership turned towards becoming centrist or even right of centre. This generation of jiyalas is not multiplying. Of course, there are others including the more educated and urban jiyalas some of whom believe in the party’s traditional ideology but there is an increasing number that is there to make some political and economic gains. This means that they are not necessarily inclined to make the party’s top leadership think of the numerous challenges that it faces, the greatest being becoming a party of the past rather than the future.
In its bid to survive the establishment’s onslaught the party has become very centralised over the past few decades. This does not bode too well as a survival tactic since it requires not one single young man at the top but several of them who can engage with a restless, ambitious and apolitical youth that demands better governance and have little reverence for old politicians or their networks. For a political party that has weakened ideologically faces massive opposition from the establishment and is deficient in leadership in terms of quantity, it would certainly take more than just cash subsidies for the poor.
Bilawal is certainly youthful and a good learner. But more than presentation, he and his minders must focus on the content which ought to reflect sensitivity towards ordinary folk whose everyday life gets severely affected by commodity prices and lack of resources. It is easy for these people to get tempted towards other institutions if the ones that are supposed to deliver do not do so. As is obvious from the politics of rural Sindh, the ordinary folk are more willing to follow extremist and right-wing forces because they may be the only ones that seem to have the gun-power to challenge the traditional power structures. These extremist forces that are the neo-feudal of the area have even attracted partners from other political parties including the PPP. This undermines young Bilawal’s idea of fighting extremism and terrorism.
A real debut speech requires a vision of governance and the ability to move away from the past to the future.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 31st, 2013.
COMMENTS (21)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Zeeshan Humayun: "We have had enough corruption, energy crises, inflation and terrorism. We dont want PPP anymore." . Your frustration is quite understandable, but are there any means by which you can seriously affect the outcome of oncoming elections?
We have had enough corruption, energy crises, inflation and terrorism. We dont want PPP anymore.
I totaly agree that there is no choice except ppp other major party pml(n) is always apologetic about terorrists.
Brilliant political analysis. In India, the Congress party IS the establishment. I don't know which country is more unfortunate, India or Pakistan.
Socialism was PPP founding fathers ideology which attracted many rebels and well meaning youth, sadly the party lost its way and today floats rudderless like many other political parties in Pakistan. Zardari is a businessman first, politician later thus the jockeying for votes needs no ideology, all that matters are results. What a Shame!
@Jamhooriat: " None have their interests in Pakistan – why is that?" . To get annal interest from an offshore facility, one is obliged to show interest in Pakistan. . @HH: "Bilawal has to understand that keep bragging about ‘Jamhooriat’ and keep crying on her mother will give PPP nothing. " . I do not understand. Are you seriously demanding that the chairman of PPP, should go against the very tenets of his own party?
Both India and pakistan faces same issues the political leaderships have utterly failed to evolve into a welfare state.
And for those who think they could secularize or liberalize a country by just electing a party to power which calls itself secular, well I think that's lunancy to its best! You have the last five years as the evidence! I'd rather encourage educating people about secualrism who think that secualrism would make the whole country atheist and turn them away from religion! Tell them the pros and cons of a secular and a religious state! Change the mind of the people who vote, not the faces of who get voted!
@Mirza: For your kind information Minorities have a Separate Electorate system in Pakistan away from the Muslims thanks to the policies started by Bhutto and completed by Zia. Also interestingely many of the voters of PMLN are not right wingers but they vote them based on performance rather than any Religious Ideology. In Upper Punjab Performance matters than any other thing as you should remember that JI or MMA never won from here in the past.
It is sad to see this writer pay some much attention and importance to a survey. In west these surveys are more reliable as people usually tell the truth In Pakistan no body tells you his real voting intentions
In electionsn people will vote the party they trust most and that is PPP
Bilawal has to understand that keep bragging about 'Jamhooriat' and keep crying on her mother will give PPP nothing.
A good political analysis of the current situation and the future of PPP. You said "it has been reduced mainly to rural Punjab and Sindh" The elections are decided in the rural heartland of Pakistan and not by the urban elite. The urban population's votes are already decided no matter what. From Karachi to Lahore most people already know who is going to win most of the different cities. However there is no other national party with presence in each province. PPP would get most votes of minorities, smaller sects, women, liberals and democrats by default. There is no other choice for these people as PML-N and PTI compete for the rightwing votes and are looking for coalition with parties like JI. The fact PPP and ANP are mostly targeted by the extremist terrorists and their sacrifices win them rural and all smaller group's votes. None of such people would vote for Taliban apologists no matter what.
This is the first time that government will complete its term. Ideally it shoud result in change of government by ballot. That will be really maturity in democracy and another first, although I prefer PPP, as it is slightly more secular.
I am amazed at how naive people can be and don't understand, or don't want to understand, that these politicians are not interested in the safety and progress of the people and the country, they are only there to make as much money as they can and leave when the time comes. None have their interests in Pakistan - why is that?
Focus on emerging Middle Class in rural sindh is needed by any political party who want to lead in SIndh.
Totally agree, but after election when PPP would transfer govt, PPP would have five year to work and educated, in open environment which will happen first time after 70s
Your analysis is as old as traditional parties. Bilawal who?
Zardari 's presence will not let any ray of enlightment fall upon Bilawal from BB's vision.
Down and out!!