Identifying the real enemy

There finally exists consensus that terrorism, dictatorship, illiteracy, diseases are real enemies of Pakistan.


Naseer Memon January 09, 2013
The writer is Chief Executive of the Strengthening Participatory Organisation

Finally, the guardians of national security have realised that internal enemies are the real threat to national security. This is a saner departure from the six-decade-old fallacy of enemies in the neighbourhood. Faceless Trojan horses have always been a bigger threat than the purported enemies across borders; losses inflicted by extremism have surpassed that of any other war on this country.

The extremism enveloping the country today has its roots in the flawed foreign policy during the formative years of Pakistan. Britain had a long history of confronting communism in the subcontinent. Although British rulers quit this region in 1947, this did not obviate their paranoia of the possible creep of communism in the region. With India’s tilt towards Russia, Pakistan became the sole option to develop as a bulwark against the red scare. The red revolution in China augmented consternation in the United Kingdom and the United States. This prompted both countries to invest in the security apparatus of this country. The British government’s secretary of defence, in his note sent on May 3, 1949, mentioned the “value of Pakistan as a main base” and argued that “Pakistan is well situated to assist in defence or recapture of the Middle East Oil area and could provide airfields for the strategic bomber offensive”. In December 1950, the US Embassy, in its report “US Strategic Interest in Area”, endorsed the aforementioned views by recognising that Pakistan’s strategic location made it the ‘only logical base’ from which to launch an attack on the USSR. Militarisation of the country was initiated on ideological grounds. The ideology of Muslim nationhood was exploited to legitimise a formidable defence establishment that could make Pakistan an invincible citadel of Islam. Over 70 per cent of the country’s total revenue was thus allocated for defence in the first budget presented on February 28, 1948.

Pakistan gradually drifted into a theocratic state to shoulder the responsibility of forestalling pernicious communist advancement in the region. This arrangement had, perforce, to eulogise religion as a key state ingredient to determine all internal and external policies of the country. The Objectives Resolution was invoked as the preamble to the Constitution and formally converted the country into a theocratic state. Ayub Khan and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto capitulated before religious elements. Ayub embellished the country’s name with the term ‘Islamic’ in the erstwhile ‘Republic of Pakistan’. Bhutto went the extra mile by declaring Ahmadis non-Muslims, prohibiting liquor and making Friday a weekly holiday to pacify enraged clerics. Ziaul Haq casted the dye by elevating jihad from individual faith to state business. Zia, an ardent advocate of Islamisation, harvested the boon of the Afghan war.The Russian invasion of Afghanistan was the last straw on the back of the US and the West. Consequently, Pakistan was made a surrogate battleground against the Soviet Union. The US and the UK imputed the Soviet Union as the real threat to Islam and became guardians of the Islamic world. Pakistan’s security establishment, with its myopic policies, made the country a scapegoat for vested interests of superpowers. The episode turned Pakistan into a perennial playground of jihadi forces.

The country never realised its perilous drift into a hotbed of religiosity. This attained a pinnacle where girls’ schools are being blasted and polio vaccinators are being brutally killed. No civilised society can allow such barbarity in the name of faith. Completely converted into a security state, the country has abdicated its citizens and the security mania has taken the toll of human development. Today, a country with atomic bombs is unable to contain a simple outbreak of measles after pumping billions into vaccination drives, which has stigmatised the country in the international community. A belated realisation merits a paradigm shift that emphasises internal affairs in the whole array of national security. Remedial measures need a more realistic approach whereby citizens’ interests become the bedrock of the national security agenda. There finally exists a broader consensus that terrorism, dictatorships, injustice, poverty, illiteracy and diseases are real enemies of Pakistan.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 10th, 2013.

COMMENTS (13)

polwala | 11 years ago | Reply

HONEST PERSPECTIVE. Maulana, Absolutely spot on. Pakistani leaders always wanted parity with a much larger neighbour in all fields through military means while neglecting the most important aspects of development. This coupled with Bhutto's legacy of Pakistan's further division and Zia's islamisation of army and society, empowered the mullah, emboldened the dissidents to become extremists and lack of education encouraged religious indocrination of many. The weapons proliferation in its western areas due to two wars in Afghanistan(Soviets and current)has impacted the security of its society and created a culture of 'might is right' amongst its political class.The result is a Pakistan that sees everything in the world as a conspiracy not only against Pakistan itself but also against all Muslims in the world, be it Palestine, Bosnia, Burma or Pakistan. A country where innocent people get killed through suicide bombs everyday, and, 'no bomb blasts today' is a matter for celebration. A course correction is long overdue. Pakistanis need a true identity as People with a history and a belonging to the subcontinent and not see themselves as descendants of some Arabs. People should give a feudal mindset. As @AbdulKalamAzad pointed out a lot of re-education of the minds is needed.

arif mehdi | 11 years ago | Reply

absolutely right and superb article.....we should realize the geographical importance of our nation.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ