When answers are rare

Pakistan's war with terrorism is complicated. We're not sure who we're fighting and why, no clear definition of...


Kamal Siddiqi December 09, 2012

Pakistan’s war with terrorism is a complicated affair. For one, we are not entirely sure who we are fighting and why. There is no clear definition of the enemy. Some say that we cannot fight our fellow Muslims. Others say that the enemy is, in fact, not even Muslim. Our standing army, which has been brought up on the diet of fighting the non-believer, cannot be blamed for being disoriented.

This is further knotted by the fact that we are also supporting some and fighting others. Short-term gains then, short-term gains now.

Remember Kargil? Win a war but lose the battle.

The loyalties that we buy at such a high price also change with time.

There are games within games. Even we are not sure who is who. Now the Americans and the Afghans are ready to talk to some. Without any thought to our long-term interests, we are now releasing some prisoners on the insistence of others. There is chaos in thinking.

So, it is not surprising that our military campaign in the tribal areas is gradually yielding us lesser dividends and more frustration. We take one hilltop. The ‘enemy’ takes another. Are we really winning this war, one wonders.

An ongoing conflict that stretches over years saps the morale of any army. Body bags being delivered on a regular basis to towns and villages across the plains are a daily reminder of the cost that we are paying for this war.

Things are also complicated by the role of the US and Afghanistan.

American actions through drone strikes are seen by some as a necessary evil. But these strikes have brought the conflict into our homes.

Every drone strike is met with a response. And it is Pakistanis that bear the brunt of this. Our leadership is not honest with its people on where they stand on this.

On both sides, there is no clear command structure. No one is entirely sure who calls the shots on our side — is it us, or the Americans? A more important question for us now is: where do we go from here?

Half of our country lives in fear of day-to-day conflict. The other half worries when they, too, will face the same situation. The year 2012 has been one of the bloodiest years in the country’s recent history. People have been killed in suicide attacks, drone strikes, bomb blasts, targeted killings and in other violent actions.

There are days when there is a feeling that the government ceases to exist. When people come out on the roads to protest, we have seen the law enforcement agencies withdraw. Many have died in street protests and property worth billions has been damaged. This is also terrorism. Our government does not seem to see it as a problem when people take the law into their own hands.

Our government’s response is mostly words, much of them targeted a foreign audience. Our politicians use terrorism as a stick to get more financial help from sympathetic lenders and donors. One can only wonder how long we can sustain this charade.

Gradually, extremists have now entered our cities. Some of these militants are home-grown, others are imported over the years. Many of them are independent of the government while others are not. Now, we are listening to discussions about the good and the bad militant, as the US also enters into talks with them.

When will we, as a country, understand what is in our interest? When will we have answers to questions that are in our minds? The answers cannot come from our present political and military leadership — more so because they seem to have taken sides already.

Other political parties are also economical with the truth. Maulana Fazlur Rehman, otherwise a sane and pragmatic person, seems to be beholden to the militants. Same is true of Qazi Hussain Ahmad whose claim that the US was behind the recent attack on his motorcade makes one wonder what he thinks of the rest of us.

We need more discussion and more answers. But the sad part of this is that no political party has mentioned terrorism as an issue in the forthcoming elections. Are the blind leading the blinkered once again?

Published in The Express Tribune, December 10th, 2012.

COMMENTS (34)

Sexton Blake | 11 years ago | Reply

@numbersnumbers: Dear Numbers, Which hoax do you wish to discuss? The Holocaust, 9/11, Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, or the one about Pakistan backing up the Taliban. I personally think we should make comments which are pertinent to the article above, which I thought was the matter under discussion. But then you do have a habit of running off on tangents. Getting back on track, Pakistan is currently being squeezed between a rock and a hard place. First off, Pakistan has to deal with the idiots in Washington whose only conscious thought is to rampage around the world killing innocent people, with their main thrust currently being Pakistan/Afghanistan, and after nearly 12 years have not learned that the war is lost. Secondly, Pakistan has to live with a huge percentage of its population who are diametrically opposed to the current illegal activity of Washington. They know they are on a winner, and they just have to wait until America bankrupts itself.

numbersnumbers | 11 years ago | Reply

@Sexton Blake: Once again, asking everyone to believe in a position but refusing to provide any references to back up same might make people suspect that said position is fabricated! By the way, still waiting for you to tell all of us THE TRUTH about the Holocaust that you hinted at in previous comments!

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ