Book review: Comparative Analysis of Media and Media Laws in Pakistan - a mirror for the media

Published: November 25, 2012
This book is a bold attempt to state the truth regarding Pakistani media in a candid and forthright manner.

This book is a bold attempt to state the truth regarding Pakistani media in a candid and forthright manner.

Should an anchorperson be an expert in diverse subjects ranging from politics, to law, to economics? If not, would he or she be able to ask pertinent and precise questions? What should the ultimate goal of the media be: building a well-informed public opinion or making it a financially viable business?

These are some of the questions that Yasmeen Aftab Ali asks, and attempts to answer, in her book Comparative Analysis of Media and Media Laws in Pakistan. The fruition of years of research in the subject, it comes across as a handbook of sorts for Mass communication students to help them better understand media concepts and laws. Its overarching theme also deliberates upon the exercise of social responsibility by the Pakistani media and suggests steps to improve it.

The book runs through the basic concepts and legislation pertaining to media in Pakistan before evaluating their effectiveness in practice. Ali lays her groundwork by first defining the concept of freedom of information, and then demonstrating the rights and limitations of this under Pakistani law. For better contextualisation, the author also gives a comparison with other countries’ media laws.

In Pakistan, the author argues, a media organisation’s editorial policy is decided by the media owner, which very often gets overridden by concerns for increased ratings amid cut-throat competition. Ideally, this should be based on impartiality, fairness, accuracy and editorial integrity, with the objective of educating the masses and raising standards of information. She blames the electronic media in particular for this ‘ratings syndrome’ and deplores the trend of TV talk show hosts instigating petty bickering among interviewees rather than grilling them on policy matters. She calls on the electronic media to rise above the ‘me first’ mentality in breaking news, which often results in sensational, or sometimes less-than-accurate, reporting.

The book is not just a critique of the state of Pakistani media; it suggests ways to improve their functioning. Her eleven proposals for Pemra and six questions for PFUJ seem logical and merit serious consideration by the stakeholders. She even suggests that the BBC’s revised editorial guidelines are a fitting model for Pakistani media organisations to adopt.

It would have been interesting for the readers had the book contained some analysis of the implications of the recently formed Press Council of Pakistan, an autonomous apex body that would stipulate and monitor good media practices in the country.

Where the author takes the media persons to task for their shortfalls, she also gives credit where it’s due. Ali pays tribute to journalists who report from increasingly hostile environments in Pakistan. But where the book falls short is in open-heartedly acknowledging the role of media in supporting the rule of law, democracy and good governance in the country. It was the media that, in the absence of robust state structures, exposed mega corruption scams in state-owned enterprises like Steel Mills, PIA, NICL and Pakistan Railways, and gave a voice to the common man.

Though beyond the scope of the syllabus for which this handbook is intended, an analysis of journalists’ rights including their protection and welfare would have added to the variety of issues touched upon here.

Nevertheless, Yasmeen Aftab Ali compellingly drives home her point that “We need an independent press, without pre-censorship, but we need rules that make a socially irresponsible journalist pay. Literally. Without the media realising its first and last responsibility lies to the society, it defeats the purpose of its very creation.”

This book is a bold attempt to state the truth regarding Pakistani media in a candid and forthright manner, duly backed by authentic references. For this reason, it is expected to generate a healthy and vigorous debate regarding media affairs in the country, and hence is highly recommended for all stakeholders, including Mass Communication students and scholars, the journalistic community and media owners and regulators.

Published in The Express Tribune, Sunday Magazine, November 25th, 2012.

Like Express Tribune Magazine on Facebook and follow at @ETribuneMag

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (6)

  • Sindh Voice
    Nov 25, 2012 - 9:46PM

    Would be a nice piece to read.


  • Nov 26, 2012 - 3:42AM

    Yasmin Aftab Ali was always so good.

    Media has its blind pots. What is annoying is that they pander to the popular trends in religion and politics.And generally ignore to invite so many well educated persons we have poets, professors etc.


  • Falcon
    Nov 26, 2012 - 3:47AM

    Thanks for the review. I would love for ET to publish reviews of Pakistani books more often. From what I have seen, educated people in Pakistan hardly read books pertaining to Pakistan.


  • Z.Khan
    Nov 26, 2012 - 3:46PM

    Very encouraging the Yasmeen gets this credit. Keep it up.


  • Iqbal Hussain
    Nov 26, 2012 - 10:25PM

    The anchor appointed in media are immature, they are simply graduates or just completed masters, so academically they can sound but while entered in the media or directly comes on national screen they must have some basic knowledge about country politics and its economy.

    They are not competent because lack of knowledge for the field they are put for interview, the question with the senior debaters who have grey hair and are seasoned in politics and in national economy. So the level of TV anchor needs to be polished to get them understand about national politics and allied information related to the country.

    Most of the time I have seen that very silly question being asked by TV anchor by the participant which even does not pertain to the topics they gathered and even it is felt by him/ her as well. But the producer pushes him to move and as such the anchor passes through a training process.


  • asghar khan
    Dec 1, 2012 - 1:25PM

    This website is very good for learning studentsRecommend

More in Books