
On practical grounds, we simply cannot be sure of the guilt of many people who have been handed down the death sentence. DNA testing is very expensive and does not automatically take place to determine incontrovertible guilt. Even in cases where DNA testing is employed, the government database of DNA samples is far too limited to return either positive or negative results in most cases. Add to this, the corruptibility of our justice system; starting with policemen who take shortcuts in investigations, to the judicial system, where the impartiality of judges is not always a given and you have a system with the potential to be riddled with errors. A life sentence is preferable to the death penalty because incorrect decisions can be overturned. On top of that, a moral case can also be made against keeping the death penalty on the statutes.
The power to take another life is a significant power to give to the state and there is scant evidence that it does much good. The deterrent effect it is supposed to have certainly has not reduced murder rates in countries that have the death penalty. And in a country like ours, where the rich can pay blood money to atone for their crimes, keeping the death penalty assures that it is applied unequally based on class. Perhaps, it is time for the government to abolish the death penalty. Not bring it back.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 16th, 2012.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ