NA passes rare pro-democracy resolution

Parliamentarians have moved swiftly to reaffirm their resolve to protect and strengthen democracy in Pakistan.


Zia Khan September 04, 2010
NA passes rare pro-democracy resolution

ISLAMABAD: Sensing the resonance of ‘big boots marching into their territory again’, the parliamentarians have moved swiftly to reaffirm their resolve to protect and strengthen democracy in Pakistan through an ‘unusual’ resolution unanimously adopted by the National Assembly on Friday.

The move, apparently a message of being united from the often-humble political forces, comes amid ‘rumoured’ reports of a ‘discreet’ plan of installing a national government which the country’s powerful security establishment wants to press ahead with.

And also it was after almost a week of bickering between two political parties on whether the military generals should have any role in either putting in place or removing administrative setups.

The house shortened a debate on the official relief endeavours in the aftermath of devastating floods across the country.

Just before the house passed the resolution, the latest outburst took place between the Pakistan Muslim League-N and Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) with top leaders from both sides questioning the democratic credentials of each other’s parties.

The MQM, under immense criticism for its chief Altaf Hussain’s invitation to generals for a martial law-styled intervention, also won a ‘face-saving  consolation’ resolution calling for the eradication of feudalism and corruption from the country. Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan came up with what appeared to be the harshest outburst so far by any MP against what he called some extra-constitutional steps by the military leadership recently.

“We respect generals as long as they protect the frontiers of the country…if they deviate from this, I will say with full force, my party will surely resist them. We can never allow any of them to change regimes,” said Nisar.

“The developments in the past few weeks are grave,” he added. He criticised the military leadership for bypassing the civilian government in flood relief efforts. The pro-democracy resolution called for strengthening true and genuine democratic system and institutions ‘freshly replanted by the people of Pakistan after years of struggle against oppression and tyranny’.

“This house reiterates its determination to uphold the supremacy of the constitution, guaranteeing fundamental rights of the people and the rule of law,” the resolution reads.

“This house shall preserve, protect and defend the constitution, which embodies the principles of democracy, freedom and political, economic and social justice.”

Moved by Law Minister Dr Babar Awan, the resolution warned against ‘disastrous consequences’ of deviation from the democratic and constitutional path that invariably leads to political instability.

“History has established this fact,” it added, mentioning that differences between the federation and the provinces, disruption of the rule of law and lack of confidence in the judicial system have always been the outcomes of military intervention.

“Any attempt to adopt extra-constitutional or non-democratic measures amounts to endangering the future of Pakistan,” said the carefully written resolution but did not give any hint of democracy being under threat.

Anti-feudal resolution

The second resolution that was initiated by the MQM members but was ultimately adopted unanimously called for eradicating feudalism from the country. “It (feudalism) will be detrimental to the interest of the people of Pakistan and to the furthering of democracy, fair play and justice in the country,” the text said.

“From the inception of Pakistan feudal lords, corrupt elements amongst the politicians, generals, bureaucracy, judges and capitalists have usurped the resources of people of Pakistan.” “This house therefore resolves that eradication of feudalism and corruption is the need of the hour and genuine land reforms is the requirement of the day,” the resolution concluded.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 4th, 2010.

COMMENTS (3)

nasim ahmed | 14 years ago | Reply I still believe that our politicians are neither sincere towards democracy nor good governace,there sole objective is to remain glued with power and make money. The time demands rule of Law unhinderred and without bias only then our society will see a change.
cmsarwar | 14 years ago | Reply No sane Pakistani would support another military rule in Pakistan.But look at this crazy Parliment handing down two unanimous and brisk resolutions which have no relevance to the prevailing agony of flood ravages at a scale unknown in the history of this nation.Instead of discussing the ways and means for rescue,rehabilitation and restoration of normalcy for the misery stricken people our representatives are engaged in a desperate bid to preserve their inherent rights to loot and plunder.This Parliment has been ,all along, completely subservient to the will and direction of the rulers,the government and the friendly opposition included,and has not been able to provide any relief to enslaved masses.Protesters agitating against load-shedding are being shot at by the police.Starving affectees of floods trying to collect food in relief camps are being mercilessly beaten.The Parliment has no time to ponder over all these tragedies.Army's efforts in flood relief are laudable.Why does the fiery Leader of the so-called Opposition in the National Assembly demand that this credit should be delivered at the door steps of a rotten civilian set-up? I am amazed at the solidarity of all the political parties in the Parliment when their determination to hold on to self-seeking grip on power is challenged.Democracy should not be disturbed after our bitter experience with military rules but not the democracy in its current ugly shape.Things have to change and it is time that our so-called leaders,in power and in opposition,start searching their souls.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ