Letter: written at last

We wonder why letter could not have been sent off earlier, saving a lot of debate, confusion, political instability.

Editorial November 08, 2012

After a tussle lasting over three years between the judiciary and the executive, we are told that the letter seeking the reopening of corruption cases against President Asif Ali Zardari has finally been dispatched to the Pakistan mission in Geneva. From here, we assume it will be handed over to the Swiss authorities. A receipt showing the letter has been received in Geneva is to be presented to the Supreme Court on November 14, according to the law minister.

It is a relief that this long drawn-out affair seems finally to be over. What it means in real terms, though, is dubious, given that the letter contains a line specifically mentioning that the president is immune from action. This has also been pointed out by former prime minister Yousaf Raza Gillani, who said that this was precisely the line he took in his refusal to dispatch the letter. The contentious debate over the matter cost the jobs of one prime minister, two law ministers, four law secretaries and three attorney generals and several senior bureaucrats. One wonders if the whole issue was really worth all this.

The letter has been sent following presidential approval granted last week and direction from the prime minister to the ministry of foreign affairs, which posted the missive. As the Swiss have already indicated, if the principle of presidential immunity is accepted, the whole matter will then come under international law. The question then arises, what all the fuss was about in the first place? We also wonder why the letter could not have been sent off about three years earlier, saving us from a lot of debate, confusion and political instability as dire forecasts were made of an impending clash between institutions and a threat to the sitting government.

It is also hard to predict what will happen now. The handling of the matter by Geneva will be closely watched. There is every possibility matters will not go very fast, at least while President Zardari holds office. And this means we may have to wait a very long time to see anything concrete emerge from this.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 9th, 2012.

Facebook Conversations


Mirza | 7 years ago | Reply | Recommend

This is a very balanced and thought provoking editorial by the ET. The main question what was all the fuss about can be easily answered. It was a whole lot of nothing, and exercise in futility. It was proven by the PCO SC that who is the real Choudhry in the country! The Swiss case is time barred and nothing is going to activate it. In addition the world judiciary is not a slave of Pakistani politics. When Sharif govt initiated this case it took its legal course in Swiss courts and no final order (from their high courts) came out. Then Pakistani govt requested the withdrawal of the case. Now again after several years they want to withdraw their withdrawal! No court of any repute would be a party to this political football. These same judges who could not prove a single allegation against Zardari despite keeping him in jail for 16 long years cannot expect the foreign courts to do their dirty job.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Load Next Story