Americans chose to stick with a divided government in Washington, by keeping the Democratic incumbent in the White House and leaving the US Congress as it is, with Democrats controlling the Senate and Republicans keeping the House of Representatives.
Obama told thousands of supporters in Chicago who cheered his every word that “we have picked ourselves up, we have fought our way back” and that for America, the best is yet to come.
He vowed to listen to both sides of the political divide in the weeks ahead and said he would return to the White House more determined than ever to confront America’s challenges.
“Whether I earned your vote or not, I have listened to you, I have learned from you. And you have made me a better president,” Obama said.
The nationwide popular vote remained extremely close with Obama taking about 50 percent to 49 percent for Romney after a campaign in which the candidates and their party allies spent a combined $2 billion.
Romney, the multimillionaire former private equity executive, came back from a series of campaign stumbles to make it close after besting the president in the first of three presidential debates.
The 65-year-old former Massachusetts governor conceded in a gracious speech delivered to disappointed supporters at the Boston convention center. He had called Obama to concede defeat after a brief controversy over whether the president had really won Ohio.
“This is a time of great challenge for our nation,” Romney told the crowd. “I pray that the president will be successful in guiding our nation.”
He warned against partisan bickering and urged politicians on both sides to “put the people before the politics.”
Obama told his crowd that he hoped to sit down with Romney in the weeks ahead and examine ways to meet the challenges ahead.
The president Obama scored impressive victories in the crucial state of Ohio and heavily contested swing states of Virginia, Nevada, Iowa and Colorado. They carried the Democrat past the 270 electoral votes needed for victory in America’s state-by-state system of choosing a president, and left Romney’s senior advisers shell-shocked at the loss.
Obama, America’s first black president, won by convincing voters to stick with him as he tries to reignite strong economic growth and recover from the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s. An uneven recovery has been showing some signs of strength but the country’s 7.9 percent jobless rate remains stubbornly high.
Obama’s victory in the hotly contested swing state of Ohio - as projected by TV networks - was a major step in the fight for the 270 electoral votes needed to clinch the White House and ended Romney’s hopes of pulling off a string of swing-state upsets.
Obama scored narrow wins in Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire - all states that Romney had contested - while the only swing state captured by Romney was North Carolina, according to television network projections.
Romney initially delayed his concession as some Republicans questioned whether Obama had in fact won Ohio despite the decisions by election experts at all the major TV networks to declare it for the president.
The later addition of Colorado and Virginia to Obama’s tally - according to network projections - meant that even if the final result from Ohio were to be reversed, Romney still could not reach the needed number of electoral votes.
While Obama supporters in Chicago were ecstatic, Romney’s Boston event was grim as the news was announced on television screens there. A steady stream of people left the ballroom at the Boston convention center.
The same problems
At least 120 million American voters had been expected to cast votes in the race between the Democratic incumbent and Romney after a campaign that was focused on how to repair the ailing US economy.
The same problems that dogged Obama in his first term are still there to confront him again.
He faces a difficult task of tackling $1 trillion annual deficits, reducing a $16 trillion national debt, overhauling expensive social programs and dealing with a gridlocked US Congress that kept the same partisan makeup.
Obama’s Democrats held their Senate majority - taking hotly contested Republican-held seats in Massachusetts and Indiana - while the Republicans kept House control.
Democrat Claire McCaskill retained her US Senate seat from Missouri, beating Republican congressman Todd Akin, who stirred controversy with his comment in August that women’s bodies could ward off pregnancy in cases of “legitimate rape.”
Democrats gained a Senate seat in Indiana that had been in Republican hands for decades after Republican candidate Richard Mourdock called pregnancy from rape something that God intended.
Democratic congressman Joe Donnelly won the race.
In another high-profile Senate race, Democrat Elizabeth Warren, a law professor who headed the watchdog panel that oversaw the government’s financial sector bailout, defeated incumbent Massachusetts Republican Senator Scott Brown.
Former Maine Governor Angus King won a three-way contest for the Senate seat of retiring Republican Olympia Snowe. King ran as an independent, but he is expected to caucus with Democrats in what would amount to a Democratic pick-up.
Florida Democratic Senator Bill Nelson easily beat back a challenge from Republican congressman Connie Mack to win a third term, while Democratic congressman Chris Murphy beat Republican Linda McMahon, a businesswoman who had served as chief executive of a professional wrestling company.
Democrats were also cheered by several state referendums.
Maryland voters approved same-sex marriage, the governor said, and a similar measure in Maine appeared on track to pass as well - marking the first time marriage rights have been extended to same-sex couples by popular vote.
In addition, Wisconsin Democratic congresswoman Tammy Baldwin became the first openly gay US Senator, defeating Republican former governor Tommy Thompson.
COMMENTS (48)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
The Re-Election of Barack Obama
Nasir Khan, Peace and Justice Post, November 7, 2012
Those left-of-the-centre Americans who had opted to vote for a lesser evil than the bigger evil in the shape of Mitt Romney have some ground to celebrate. In fact, anything was possible; Romney could have also found his way to the White House. American political system is deeply flawed and has become more mouldy and outdated. It does not represent the hopes and aspirations of the American people any longer.
The presidential election itself is a contest in which big money talks and imposes its decisions on the masses. Actual problems facing the superpower that has hegemony over a large part of humanity and regions of the world are brushed aside and a diversionary picture put before the electorate that produces much sound but signifies nothing. Big gala shows and rallies make the whole thing look comical and cheap advertisement. That’s not what the democracy is about or can ever be justified for hiding the concerns of millions of ordinary men and women and their economic and social hardships.
President Obama in his first term proved to be a true representative of American military-industrial complex. He carried out where Bush had left. He also extended the Afghan war of aggression into Pakistan and in most cowardly fashion has been conducting the killings of Pakistani ‘militants’ in Pakistan by his drone attacks. The people of Pakistan and other places who become victims of such assassinations have no means at their disposal to combat the advanced technological robots that kill them at his orders.
Now the question is: Will he continue his policy of such killings and disregard international law and the Geneva Conventions? Like Bush and Condi Rice, his foreign policy in the Middle East has been a total charade. Has he any sense of moral responsibility towards the Palestinian people who are still under occupation of Israel and its cruel policies? Without American military and financial support, Israel couldn’t have carried out the occupation or oppression of a captive population.
These things are not a secret and certainly President Obama is well aware of all these things. Now he has a new four-year term of office. Will he be able to change the course of his foreign policy or will he continue what he did during the last four years? Only the time will tell. But he has some opportunity to show respect to international law, the Geneva Conventions and stop the illegal killing of people in foreign countries. He can also advance the cause of peace in the Middle East, not by reiterating the American mantra of the ‘security of Israel’ but stand for the legitimate rights of the Palestinians under Israeli Zionist occupation and oppression.
People will judge President for his actions, not his words. Let's hope his words and actions match from now on. The oppressed and victimised people and nations at the hands of US imperialism and its allies will be truly glad if he shows resolute courage to stand for what is right and not military might.
@the person two comments above me Request to ET, you ban all my comments where I criticize the media, how about banning people from using offensive usernames!
Btw bro, it sometimes feels like you're a cyber agent, what you say is so stupid. Either that, or you blindly listen to media. Okay, Osama was "killed" in Pakistan. Proof? His body was dumped into the sea! The team that killed him was itself killed. Renal failure, he couldn't possibly even live beyond 2006. Osama was a CIA agent who always popped up exactly where America wanted him so they could have an excuse to target that area. In your case: Media > Common Sense / Logical Reasoning
"@mnn:And look up Mitt Romney’s quotes on immigrants and immigrant policy to see who is more prejudiced towards Muslims." Highly respected sir now Mitt Romney has been defeated and Obama has won and re-elected and Obama's previous policies show and prove that Obama shall not discontinue his policies regarding the muslim world and muslims especially Pakistani and Afghani......
@salman: If you or your dad or the Pak Govt would take care of people like Osama Uncle living in villas in Pakistan then Obama will not need to do anything the problem is you and others like you dont want to do anything so let the US take care of business and dont complain
I don't car who wins.But he has won second time so i think he will keep on killing innocent people of pakistan.
A win for Obama doesn't mean more drones. Romney said that he would take harder actions against Pakistan than Obama does. America is a sick, war-loving killing machine, whoever it's led by. Don't bring Pakistan into this, whether we are or not, but America certainly is.
The three famous words, "Yes we can." He has done it again. Whatever the differences between Pakistan and America, you have to hand it to Obama. Nevertheless, please do not forget Romney who played an even more impressive game.Congratulations galore all round! Salams
Obama beat Romney in the "electoral college" rankings pretty bad. But, popular vote was close. Something that will end up being something like Obama 51% Romney 49%. Not that it matters as the electoral college rankings are what end up mattering to those outside the US and as far as who wins officially. Technically someone can win by the electoral college rankings and it still not have a higher popular vote ranking. But, that's another topic in and of itself and doesn't much matter in the article's actual topic. @Satan: It's now official. Though I am saying this acknowledging that at the time of your comment it technically still was just a projection, so you weren't wrong. It's more like an update you're probably even already aware of.
@Analyzer: Hype was for two heads backed by same elites. No hype for other candidates in the presidential race.
great to see Romney congratulating obama on victory. I would love to see our losing leader congratulating the winning one in a very civilized manner this elections in Pakistan.
Hail Obama... Pakistan Zindabad
So its PPP, MQM, ANP and Army Govt in 2013 in Pakistan? Certainly!
@M.Ahmer Ali: No it does not definitely and precisely mean any of those things. Stop over-reacting.
And look up Mitt Romney's quotes on immigrants and immigrant policy to see who is more prejudiced towards Muslims.
Expect more drones....over muridke,karachi, Lahore balochistan and South Punjab...
More drones for Taliban!
.... and now hopefully more drones. It is Obama only who can remove the terrorists from Pakistan.
America and the world still have not forgotten the Bush (Republican) era and no matter how hard Romney worked it was a far gone conclusion. Romney lost and so Obama won.
A win for Obama is an overwhelming endorsement of drone attacks in Pakistan. Let the drones rain down on the bad guys !!
Doest it even matter who win or lose American Elections specially for Pakistanis when every thing is clear that nothing gonna change for Pakistan. Do change Pakistan... Can't ignore the option Imran Khan.
next target is mullah omar for obama
Congragulations! I am very happy that Obama won. As far policies against Pakistan Romney & Obama would have been similar approach.
I'm surprised at the number of people who are more afraid of Obama than Romney. Romney is no friend to Pakistan or anyone else, save Israel. Romney/Ryan were friends to the rich white elite class in America and that's all. Obama isn't perfect but I'll take him ANY DAY over Romney. Four more years. Cheers.
@Nabeel Khan: Come on, if it happens we gonna loss everything.....in Pakistan no body is gonna accept such results favoring reelecting PPP for another term....nor it's gonna afford it in current geo-political situation.
Obama got Osama, just for that he deserved to win; Obama exposed Pakistan's double dealings in the Osama episode, just for that he deserved to win.
Pakistanis are as usual always on the wrong side of history, Pakistan was the only Muslim country rooting for a Romney win.
So what!!! It has nothing to do with us Pakistanis. They are all the same to us.
Do Pakistani Media need to be So excited, All over Pakistan on News Channels and News Paper, this is the HOT Topics of the Day.
How many Drones shall be Crakced to Celebrate the Success?
Nobody could care less really about this election...
congrats obama and the people of America, well deserved victory!
As a token of appreciation to people who supported all over the world ,lets expect a token drone strike in pakistan which favoured Mitt.
oh ! it makes me fear that we may have same government again ! No i , Dont want to see PPP again :(
India behind this
Mr. Obama being a Democrat Presidential Candidate was destined to win right from the very beginning.
Even after four years when Mr. Obama will complete his eight years in the White House, I have very strong reasons to believe that another Democrat may win the Presidential Election in 2016.
The core reason is that Republican candidates have lost the popularity among the US voters for one simple reason that due to their policies, the US voters have suffered a lot. The war which started in Afghanistan and then in Iraq by the Republican Candidate is still continuing as Democrats just cannot end the war and withdraw the troops.
The consequences of the Republican foreign policies will continue for another decade and finally it can only diminish when Democrats will work hard to rebuild US economy.
Its just the projection Mr. Tribune, no need to get hyper. Romney hasnt conceded yet. Remember Gore and Bush scenario!. Relax Tribune Calm Down!
Obama let Pakistan know of his victory in 2008 by dramatically increasing drone attacks that has killed numerous innocent men, women, and children. Wonder what his victory message to us will be this year....
Sad news for Pakistan
Mainstream media is the same everywhere, so much worthless hype created and still Obama wins comfortably. Congrats to President Obama.
American voter believes Obama served the country and interests according to their wishes, therefore they choose him for next four years. And here in our beloved country what we witness in a routine, COA issuing threats to judiciary and elected parliament instead of focusing on what he was hired for.
Obama won the the election 2012 and became super ruler of the super power once again.it means Americans don't want to change policies toward south Asian countries .Afghanistan remains as it is, Pakistan kisses more Drone attacks,the policy of pick and kick for Pakistan remains same .
Thank you for your votes my fellow Pakistanis.
Celebration all over US and Liyari (Karachi) on Obama's win :)
2013: Networks Project People's Party win Elections Again. God Forbid, but that seems to be coming our way as well !!