Hence, the first big contradiction was the anti-Americanism signalled by the religious and political parties in their post-Malala statements: that the attack on the girl should be seen as an extension of the drone-and-blasphemy problem and thus ignored. After that came the electoral fixations of various parties. Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf eyed votes in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa which irked the JUI-F relying on votes in the semi-tribal belt, stretching from Dera Ismail Khan to northwestern Balochistan under the shadow of a vague accommodation with the Taliban. Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N stuck to its line of ‘talking to the Taliban’ because of its vulnerability to the Punjabi Taliban and their hinterland elements capable of delivering suicide bombers. The Jamaat-e-Islami did not want to suffer an erosion of votes in the face of Maulana Fazlur Rehman’s refusal to revive the clerical alliance called the MMA and was, surprisingly, more decisive in its rejection of the Malala incident through its leaders Qazi Hussain Ahmad, Amirul Azeem and finally its current chief, Dr Munawwar Hasan. Malala’s ‘American connection’ began to be highlighted on the Internet. One great persuader in this respect was the intent to isolate the MQM, which seemed to harvest the post-Malala feeling more daringly than others, by calling on the army to go after the Taliban.
The ANP, despite its clash with the MQM in Karachi, decided to advocate the attack because of its virtual collapse in the face of Taliban terror in Peshawar, which threatened also to underscore the folly of rejecting the PPP-MQM decision to stage local government polls in Sindh. Deluded by the army chief’s newfound conviction that fighting extremism is Pakistan’s own war, the PPP hoped that North Waziristan would now be attacked to avenge the assassination of its leader, Benazir Bhutto, and to give it a level playing field during the coming general election, during which the Taliban terror would be the deciding factor. The PPP’s minister then suffered a deflation of his chest announcing that no attack was in the offing because the army said that a political decision was needed before it could go into the agency. This time, it did not say that it would choose its own timing vis-à-vis the attack against several communities of terrorists congregating in North Waziristan in the presence of a full complement of Pakistan’s military positioning. Suddenly, the army chief seemed keen to dispel the impression given by his remarks on Malala’s tragedy.
North Waziristan is where Hakimullah Mehsud is hiding after his near-successful attack on Times Square, New York. It is where the Haqqani network has its base from where it spreads out to Kurram Agency conducting Shia killings and attacking inside Afghanistan. It is where the Wahhabi-Takfiri Arabs and al Qaeda rank and file are located. It is where the Uzbeks and the Punjabi Taliban, holding governor Salmaan Taseer’s son, are spending rest and recreation time after destroying Pakistan’s peace. The Lashkar-e-Jhangvi is also there as a formal ally of al Qaeda together with Jundullah. Pakistan has to fight terrorism and North Waziristan is the battleground. The world will rally around Pakistan if it decides to fights its own war.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 17th, 2012.
COMMENTS (9)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@jaddy: "if we can talk to clean-shaved terrorists from karachi,then why not with those in waziristan ?"
Not sure who meets your definition of clean shaved terrorists from Karachi. But whoever it is - have they said that they do not believe in Pakistan's constitution? If not that is the key difference. What kind of dialogue is possible for people who do not even accept your constitution?
if we can talk to clean-shaved terrorists from karachi,then why not with those in waziristan ?
There will be no operation in North waziristan atleast in years to come .Mark my words.
@Mirza: Agreed 100%. Very beautifully said...
Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mr Rehman Malik has poured cold water on the considerations that underlie this editorial. All the facts and arguments adduced in the editorial are wholly in order and accurate. It forthrightly calls things by their proper names, which is the first step towards understanding a problem. Then, its central recommendation, namely, that the Pakistan Army should launch operations in North Waziristan Agency, seemed to be the right step in the right direction. But, then, there is, it seems, nothing like across-the-parties consensus on what needs to be done. And so, terrorists of various hues, named in the editorial, shall continue to perpetrate terror and to undermine the State of Pakistan. There is no reason to fault the editorial on any count. It sums up the question in its concluding sentence: “The world will rally around Pakistan if it decides to fights its own war.” But several of the political parties and other groupings have their own calculus about what suits their politics. The stalemate and the impasse in Pakistan shall continue. This is unfortunate. It seems personages like Malala and Rimsha shall be sacrificed in due course. V. C. Bhutani, Delhi, India, 17 Oct 2012, 0335 IST
It is so frustrating to see everything being fizzled out and we are back to square one. Malala's sacrifice seems to have gone in waste. We are spending major chunk of our resources on defence forces and in return we are getting insecurity and chaos in Pakistan. Shame on Imran Khan and religoius elements who are part of this alliance. History will never forgive all of them
North Waziristan operation is suicide. Pakistani Army cannot even clear SWA after 8 years of war. How will it handle 10 times more intense opposition in North Waziristan?
A great editorial by an independent paper, thanks for that. The attack that never was! In Pakistan the deep state and rightwing parties cannot go against their strategic assets no matter how many tens of thousands of civilians butchered. These assets have been used against not just foreign countries but also against the secular leaders, minorities and smaller sects of Islam. For tackling these terrorists there should be a unanimity which is sadly lacking. It is only in Pakistan that the military needs consensus from the rightwing parties and not just do the right thing. Some naive thought that after Malala the army and country would go against the terrorists but it is only one Malala, many like her have been butchered with not reaction from the army and I am afraid many more would without any recourse except the drones.