ISLAMABAD: In the face of scathing criticism directed towards the army in recent days, Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani released on Wednesday a rare public statement on strife-torn Balochistan.
Gen Kayani was quoted as saying that the military would support any political process to resolve the unrest in the province – provided that it was in the constitutional framework. He also sought to dispel the impression that the security establishment was, in any way, a hurdle in the resolution of Balochistan’s problems.
“The army supports any political process in the province as long as it is within the Constitution of Pakistan,” the army chief was quoted as saying by the Inter-Service Public Relations (ISPR).
A military official told The Express Tribune that the recent criticism of the army by some political leaders compelled Gen Kayani to issue the policy statement on Balochistan.
The security establishment recently came under attack during a gripping court hearing on the law and order situation in Balochistan where former provincial chief minister Sardar Akhtar Mengal made an appearance in the Supreme Court.
Mengal presented a six-point charter, calling for an immediate end to all “covert and overt military operations” in Balochistan, a fair court trial of all missing persons, and an end to all “death squads” allegedly operating under the supervision of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and the Military Intelligence (MI).
The military authorities, however, denied allegations and insisted that it was in favour of political steps leading to a solution of the Balochistan imbroglio.
Referring to Gen Kayani’s statement, the military official said though the army supports a political process, it had reservations on certain issues.
“The demand for international arbitration on Balochistan and portraying the issue as if it is between two states is not acceptable,” the official added. He claimed that no overt and covert military operations were underway in any part of Balochistan. “This is mere propaganda.” He said the Frontier Corps has presence in Balochistan but it was under the control of the federal interior ministry, not the army.
Commenting on Kayani’s statement, political analyst Ahmed Bilal Mehboob said the army wanted to see some kind of normalcy return to insurgency-hit Balochistan.
“Probably, they (the army) want to wave a white flag, so that nationalists end their boycott of political activities ahead of elections,” added Mehboob, who is also the Executive Director of Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT).
Nationalist parties had boycotted the last general elections in 2008 as a protest against the military operation launched by then military ruler General Pervez Musharraf.
(Read: Voices from Balochistan)
Published in The Express Tribune, October 4th, 2012.
COMMENTS (16)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Why he is to decide its constitutional or not his statement is full of Dictatorial conspiracy. If it were any US or EU general or in Turkey he will be Court Martial for this statement. I never seen such a political General before....oh yes just one Ayub Khan!!! This man is using democracy for his own sake, use Zardari's corruption to recover army's goodwill, Playing with political parties to architect another hung parliament in future, take extention, All his period he is meeting foreigners american generals/officials without govt permission with all that present himself as democratic
Mr Noor Nabi, which civilian control that is averse to progressive system of taxation and always adopt the course of regressive taxation in total disregard of the miseries of common man for their extravagance, loot and plunder.As for Dakha surrender, the military operation in former East Pakistan would have been avoided, if the PPP leadership had not boycotted the first National Assembly session after 1970 general elections and Z A Bhutto did not tear away _Poland,s resolution in the United Nations.To put the record straight no military operation, whatsoever had been carried out in KPK(former NWFP).
This man means business. Please listen to what he says.
@ noor nabi
Pls evaluate how everything else that is under civilian control is doing? Railway, PIA, Steel Mill, police, law & order, health facilities, transport, electricity, gas economy, etc.
Einstein said: Its foolishness to do the same over and over again and expect a different result!!
Look who is talking ?
Military's security assessments / briefings to civil leadership are of paramount importance no doubt. However political leadership should be smart enough to take a holistic view of the situation than totally relying on fauji view. baloch are not others, they are us the people of pakistan.
"Constitution is a piece of paper that I can tear apart any time" I wonder why that piece of paper becomes so imoprtant for Khakis when it comes to their likes and dislikes.
Army Chief talking about Constitutional boundaries. The courts taking day-to-day administrative decisions. TV anchors setting the future course of action. And the politicians busy in plundering. Long Live....Pakistan.
“The army supports any political process in the province as long as it is within the Constitution of Pakistan,” the army chief" This statement is really a must as the army never did anything outside of constitution in Pakistan's history. Why a paid govt servant should make any policy or political statment?
It is not for the Army to decide the constitutional boundaries, it has to work strictly under the constitution. the Army,s history of love for the constitution is known.
This statement from Kiyani is enough that there had been army's interference in the policy of interior and foreign policy affairs. Instead of giving their consent/ support Army could have said that we believe in the steps of civil authorities towards normalization in Balochistan.. . When army says "support' it means they have a aright to disagree also.
i believe that Sardar Mangel has been encouraged to come/ invited to be a bridge between the Insurgents and the government ( after taking the army into confidence) to bring them in mainstream politics of democracy and lay off armed struggle. Any way these are positive signs.
General Kiyani did the right thing, The nation stands with him.
The first step - in full conformity with the Constitution of Pakistan - is for the military to be under civilian control. The armed forces of Pakistan, after shamelessly surrendering in Dhaka in December 1971, took uon themselves the task of destroying what was left. Baluchistan and the former NWFP province (now K-P) are emblazoned with the inglorious contributions of the rule of Zia-ul-Haq and Musharraf. General Kayani should not hide from this truth and do all he can to salvage a challenging situation. Slick statements are unacceptable.