US citizens call for end to drone strikes
American peace activists delivered a letter, along with petitions from around 3,000 other US citizens, calling upon US authorities to end drone strikes in Pakistan to the US embassy in Islamabad, according to a press release issued on Wednesday.
The letter, which has been signed by 26 leading American intellectuals, activists and media personalities including seminal political critic Noam Chomsky, asks US authorities to bring its drone strike policy in line with US and international law.
The peace activists who delivered the letter and petitions are in Pakistan as part of a delegation organised by the US peace organisation CodePink. The letter itself was arranged by the American group Just Foreign Policy.
According to the letter, 474 to 884 civilians, including 176 children, have been killed in US drone strikes in Pakistan since 2004. Citing a report by Stanford and New York universities, it says civilians in the area live in a state of constant fear.
Meeting acting US Ambassador to Pakistan Richard Hoagland, Just Foreign Policy’s Policy Director Robert Naiman challenged him to respond to reports of civilian rescuers being targeted by the drone strikes and assertions by international law experts that such targeting constituted a war crime, the press release said. While Hoagland denied deliberate strikes against civilian rescuers, Naiman pointed out that even if they were not deliberately targeted, the practice of ‘follow-up’ strikes endangered the rescuers’ lives. “When Americans found out what the war in Afghanistan was, they turned against it… when they find out that the drone strike policy in Pakistan is killing and terrorising civilians and hitting civilian rescuers, they will turn against it as well,” Naiman said.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 4th, 2012.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1716998435-0/Ryan-Reynolds-Hugh-Jackman-(3)1716998435-0-405x300.webp "article")
1730806490-0/New-Project-(2)1730806490-0-270x192.webp "jcp names justice amin ud din khan as constitutional bench head")
1730802981-0/Untitled-design-(53)1730802981-0-270x192.webp "fakhar imam set to rejoin pakistan squad for south africa tour")
1730799445-0/Untitled-design-(52)1730799445-0-270x192.webp "pakistan iran agree to jointly tackle border security challenges")
1730706072-0/Copy-of-Untitled-(2)1730706072-0-270x192.webp "influence of pop culture on marketing")
@Caramelized_Onion: lol... well put!
Drones are not good but the terrorists are terrible. Then they have safe heaves. What are the options? . Probably we do not have any. The world must give a clear message, that terrorism will not be tolerated! We have to gun each terrorist and each of their supporters are to be gunned down no matter where they is the cost the world pays. . Drone is a wonderful equipment and the civilised world should come together and finish these migraine once for all ... . . . . . .
Oh no, who will our burger eating, latte sipping liberals copy now? Even some in American public are against the drones. It will get harder to laugh at Imran Khan now, feel sorry for our liberals.
Imran Khan is termed 'Taliban Khan' by the pseudo-liberals living in Pakistan for his rigid stance opposing drone strikes. By the same inane logic, this makes the Americans Taliban sympathizers too. Just goes to show how silly our "intellectuals" actually are...