A break for Obama

Democrats see Ryan’s nomination as an opportunity to bring the issue of governance to centre stage.


Tariq Fatemi August 28, 2012
A break for Obama

The US presidential election is still about 70 days away, but with the Republicans gathered in Tampa for the convention to anoint Mitt Romney as their candidate, the race has acquired ideological tension and personal acerbity, particularly after Paul Ryan’s selection as the running mate.

Paul Ryan’s selection has intrigued many but it should be recalled that President Barack Obama’s victory four years ago was a watershed in American political development. Thanks to his skill and intelligence in ‘packaging’ himself as a harbinger of ‘change’, Obama had generated huge excitement, especially among the youth and minorities. But it also upset many whites, particularly the devout ‘Christians’, who felt ‘humiliated’ that a person of mixed ethnic and cultural background should have captured the nation’s leadership.

Mitt Romney’s nomination was more the result of lacklustre performance by his rivals than any enthusiasm for him in the party’s rank and file. This may explain Paul Ryan’s choice as his running mate. This young, articulate and combative Congressman has headed the House Budget Committee where much of the battle over the economy has been fought over the last two years. Though vice presidential candidates matter little in presidential races, given Romney’s moderate policies and his Mormon faith — which continues to cause misgivings to conservatives — Paul Ryan’s nomination could have a major impact on the election, either galvanising the evangelicals or upsetting the moderates.

It may, therefore, be the first time that the vice presidential candidate’s political philosophy may come to define the tone and tenor of the presidential race. Given Ryan’s leadership on budgetary issues, including the conservative campaign to reorder the nation’s tax and spending priorities for the 21st century, he has become a darling for the right. As for the moderates, he is an anathema, since their fear is that his efforts to reduce the role of government could undo many of the country’s social safety nets and convert Medicare into a capped voucher programme. The nation’s income tax system too, which was crafted by both Republican and Democratic administrations, would also undergo a radical change ensuring massive distribution so as to favour the rich, while hurting the poor. Ryan has also been an ardent foe of abortion rights, same-sex marriage and government funding for family planning, while championing the right of gun owners.

Foreign policy plays only a minimal role in presidential elections with voters primarily interested in the economy, which is why both Romney and Ryan have said little on the subject, other than to reiterate their total support for Israel. In fact, Romney has chosen to ignore the party’s mainstream foreign policy experts and opt for people with a decidedly neoconservative bent of mind, who are viewed as unilateralists, with a missionary zeal to spread American values abroad, coupled with open admiration for Israel’s hard line leadership. Many of them are in the Bolton mold, contemptuous of the UN, disdainful of multilateral diplomacy and ardent supporters of America’s right to intervene whenever it advances American interest. His closest foreign policy adviser is Dan Senor, who was the spin doctor of Paul Bremer, the first administrator of post-occupation Iraq. A Romney presidency would be no joy to those looking for a more peaceful world.

The race remains close and is likely to become tighter with the passage of time. The president, who has presided over an economy that has failed to pick up, is counting on mistakes and failings of his rival rather than on presenting new initiatives. The Democrats, therefore, see Ryan’s nomination as an opportunity to bring the issue of governance to centre stage of the debate. President Obama need no longer be confined to defending his record but can turn the election into a referendum on the conservative vision. He can go back to being the moderate, caring national leader protecting the middle class, which is why Ryan’s presence on the ticket may well be a welcome break for President Obama in an increasingly nasty race.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 29th, 2012.

COMMENTS (13)

littlegiant | 12 years ago | Reply

This is quite straight-forward - Obama had little power in bringing a transformational change because the president is a symbolic figure rather than a person who can have a major tangible impact. The fact is that the gap between the 95% and the top 5 percent is so huge that today the 95% in the u.s. are far worse off then their counterparts in other developed nations and the middle-class in many emerging nations has fast approached and, in some cases, surpassed that of the U.S. 95%. The non-executive workers in U.S. are underemployed, top university grads are working contract jobs or just semi-employed, the jobs have gone abroad already. For pakistanis in u.s., we have failed to crack the executive ranks within |U.S. and now collectively suffer the fate of the middle-class u.s. Slavishly work to death without much reward and keep longing to back to Pakistan because there's a ceiling that hardly any Pakistani has broken through in the U.S.

Falcon | 12 years ago | Reply

@Sajida: Thanks for sharing the link. Certainly interesting. I think it is the issue of perceptions vs. reality. What I was talking about are perceptions. What you are talking is reality. Overall, there is an interesting trend in American politics. Republicans and Democrats are converging to the center yet they think they are so different that they have no room for compromise. This lack of willingness to take tough decisions does not bode well for US in the long run and some prominent political economists such as Paul Krugman have already highlighted the gravity of this issue.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ